Where to start? Here, here: The last time I met with Anaheim’s interim police chief Raul Quezada I asked him about the controversial gang injunction zones, of which Anaheim has six: Had they been successful in his opinion? Would he begin to phase them out if he became chief? Or would he expand them, create more?
He answered (cagily, as it was an indiscreet topic to broach before his confirmation) that there was an important case going through the courts right then, and that all law enforcement was watching to see what happened with that, before they made any big decisions on gang injunctions. “You mean, Vasquez v. Rackauckas?” “Yes, exactly.”
I’m just telling you to show that’s how important Vasquez v. Rackauckas is, the bellwether case that our DA Tony Rackauckas just lost to the ACLU in the 9th circuit Court of Appeals – costing OC taxpayers over $4 million to defend what all courts so far agree is a grossly unconstitutional and unfair wide-net approach to pacifying (allegedly) troubled neighborhoods.
Before I go on with the topic of gang injunctions, this case in particular, and the police abuses Orange neighborhoods are still suffering despite (or in revenge for) the OPD’s court defeats, I should point out other recent Faceplants our useless DA has blown gobs of your money on while complacently closing his sleepy eyes to the corruption of his political cronies and brutality of many OC police forces. From the Voice of OC‘s Tracy Wood:
In September, Rackauckas asked a Superior Court judge to dismiss all charges against a Saudi Arabian princess living in Irvine who had been accused by his office of human trafficking. Rackauckas made the request after determining the “evidence cannot support” the allegations, according to a story in The Orange County Register.
Last fall, a panel of Orange County Superior Court judges ruled the county was illegally banning registered sex offenders from parks because it was preempting state law and creating a confusing patchwork of local restrictions. Rackauckas had persuaded the county to adopt the ban and then campaigned strenuously to have local cities adopt it.
[And, as we broke the news last week, he’s now diving into a high-profile 18-years-stale murder trial against a World Health Organization psychologist that has most of us scratching our heads, but is getting Tony lots of press.]
Anyways that’s $4 million so far just defending the Orange Varrio Cypress gang injunction, and WHO KNOWS if this “law-&-order” grandstander will take the case further, to the Supreme Court? The City of Orange is already trying to wriggle out of the bills, while the DA’s snotty spokeswoman Susan Kang Schroeder re-assures us that “we’ll make sure it will be paid … It WILL come out of taxpayer money.” And now he vows to continue “using this important tool against gangs” and ponders out loud whether to take the case further. Do you OC taxpayers have the appetite for that?
But before we cast too much blame and ridicule on our craven political animal of a DA, note that he says he’s only doing what the people of the OC, his constituents, want him to do, and he may be right. Never forget how Orange County, a great deal of it, was born – scared white folks streaming in from LA in the wake of the Watts Riots, wanting nothing more than to be safe from the scary lower classes. That generation is dying off, sure [hat tip Oprah] but is the majority attitude in our county still, “Whatever you have to spend, whatever rules you have to break, however many lives you have to ruin, just keep us safe from those poor brown people?” Well, is it? Punk?
Next year’s DA election won’t tell us much, given our rock-and-a-hard-place choice between Rackauckas and his implacable, draconian rival Todd Spitzer. With choices like that, we may well continue to be a goldmine for the ACLU for years to come. But some of you folks who may think that The Man is just doing what he has to do, and needs Gang Injunctions to Keep You Safe, may need to learn a little bit about Gang Injunctions. Here are just two of what I see as the biggest problems with the policy, both of which are illustrated perfectly in this particular OVC injunction:
- Gang Injunctions unjustly punish, and ruin the lives forever, of what I think are some of our most valuable citizens – young, hardworking, well-meaning poor people who are just trying to work, get an education, start or raise a family, and contribute to our society, but have the misfortune of living in what the law deems the “wrong neighborhood” and near or related to the “wrong people.” These injunctions place probation-like restrictions on an entire neighborhood’s young men: they can’t be out in public in groups of more than two; they have a 10:00 p.m. curfew, they can’t be anywhere alcohol is served, they can’t associate with even a family member who’s suspected or accused of being a “gang member.” Then, the injunctions leave it to the sole discretion of the local cops to decree who is and is not a “gang member” – and since law enforcement for various reasons is motivated to inflate those numbers, countless innocents are swept up with a gang rap on their record, which is nearly impossible to remove.
- This may not always be the case, but it certainly is here – the injunction zones are not chosen so much for public safety and crime concerns, but to clear out a working-class neighborhood for purposes of GENTRIFICATION – the injunction will both motivate the affected folks to move out, while also – duh – causing the property values to plummet, making it even easier for a predatory corporation to pick off the remaining properties. In this case, the predatory corporation, the real big money in central Orange, is Chapman University.
A Nice Old Neighborhood called Orange Varrio Cypress.
Octogenarian “Uncle Paul” Guzman lights up like a sparkler when discussing his old neighborhood, which he can do for hours if you let him. He remembers the 30’s like yesterday, but can also tell you all about 1909 – an exact century before the gang injunction, when there were only two buildings on this street. Just up that way, a couple blocks north, nothing but orange groves as far as the eye could see. Mexicans streamed in to pick not only oranges but also walnuts, lemons … well, everything that has streets named after it now. By the 20’s the streets were paved, there were sidewalks, and houses up and down.
Right over there was a dormitory for the workers. Right here – still standing, next door to Emigdio’s mural – is the “Friendly Center” that the Quakers built in the 20’s. Back then this was the only area in town that Mexicans and Mexican-Americans could own homes, and it was forbidden to speak Spanish in school, but the folks assimilated as they could. Most parents and grandparents wouldn’t speak Spanish in the home, because they wanted their kids to succeed in their new country. Young Uncle Paul used to sneak over to the immigrant workers’ dorm to cook for them, teach them English, and learn Spanish from them, but he was unusual. For decades now, it’s rare to hear someone speaking Spanish in this neighborhood (where I actually lived from 79-81.)
World War II, Korea, Vietnam, came and went, and the men of the barrio went off to war. When they came back they considered themselves patriotic Americans, not any kind of immigrants or underclass. Recognize this character in the blue zoot suit from Emigdio’s mural (to the right?) That’s Uncle Paul’s big brother “Calie,” in the 40s. When Calie’s dad caught him dressed like that, he ripped up all Calie’s zoot suit trousers – these were considered disreputable. In 1947 Calie joined the Army and fought in Korea; when he returned home in 1949 he never wore a zoot suit again.
And the neighborhood developed its own traditions and festivities, here and at nearby Holy Family Cathedral. One big annual event was the Jamaica Fiesta each summer, a summer harvest festival imported from Mexico; “jamaica” means hibiscus, and also a delicious, healthy drink you can get at your more authentic Mexican restaurants (although I prefer tamarindo…)
One thing Uncle Paul is adamant about is that the neighborhood was NEVER violent, NEVER dangerous, and never had ANYTHING you or I would think of as a “gang” in today’s fearmongering parlance. Not back when he was young, and not in the past thirty years either. “You know what passed for gang warfare around here? We would throw wild horse melons at the kids on the other side of the tracks, and they would throw them back at us.” WILD HORSE MELONS? “Yeah… I haven’t seen ’em around in years… they grew right out of the ground, especially by the tracks, they were 3-5 inches around… you could boil ’em to make soap, they weren’t as bad as rocks but they HURT when they hit you!” (Sounds like he means CITRON melons, small nasty things that apparently grow near citrus trees.)
This comports with everything else I hear about the OVC barrio. The notion of scary criminal gangs in every minority neighborhood, a notion developed in the 1970’s, was largely a construction of law enforcement and the media, sometimes self-fulfilling and sometimes not even true, as here on Cypress Street. As in any neighborhood there were always some young people who committed crimes, and they generally ended up in jail where they belonged. But the records show Orange (now AND in 2009) to be one of the less violent towns of its size in the county, and there are higher crime areas than OVC in Orange itself which have never been put under injunction – for example El Modena, with its four or five gangs. More crime was actually committed in the downtown area by Chapman students, and the last murder to take place before 2009 was by a Chapman student in a drug deal gone bad. [See this scholarly paper, Negative Impacts of Gang Injunctions: Vasquez v. Rackauckas, by Gabriela Hernandez et al.]
And when District Court Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank (right) demanded to see this allegedly dangerous gang neighborhood, she was driven up and down the streets with a police escort… stared quizzically at the clean neighborhood, notable lack of graffiti and dearth of tattoo’d youth, muttered something like “What the heck are they talking about?” And then ruled roundly against Tony Rackauckas’ gang injunction. And had her ruling upheld last month.
The obvious suspicion is that a Gang Injunction in Chapman University’s neighborhood, in an area that notably didn’t need such a draconian measure, must have been done for the benefit of Chapman. Uncle Paul, an owner of multiple properties who’s been combating Chapman’s inexorable expansionism for literally decades, cautions us not to be too simplistic and conspiratorial. “There are lots of reasons a gang injunction can happen, but the main one is the police wanting to control minority areas and poor areas.”
True … but you can’t help but look at the facts on the ground, at who’s benefiting. People affected by the injunction have mostly moved out. The property values have gone down dramatically as a result of the injunction. Code enforcement has also been brought in frequently, demanding unreasonable, unaffordable repairs from poor elderly residents. And Chapman has been buying up properties throughout the neighborhood, often for less than the owner wanted to sell. Walking down those streets with the locals, it’s all “Chapman just bought that. And that too. THAT owner will never sell to Chapman though.”
The University’s well-tended wikipedia page boasts,
“Chapman began an aggressive, ten year construction program with the opening of Beckman Hall in 1998. And in 1999, Chapman launched its largest fundraising effort ever—a $200 million comprehensive campaign for facilities, programs and endowments—which surpassed its goal and drew in $214 million by the time it ended in May 2002.” … and then continues in great detail.
Uncle Paul, a veteran of decades of negotiations with Chapman (and hence perhaps possessed of a little more respect and caution than the rest of us have) tells of years of ups and downs in the university’s relationship with the community since they acquired the old Orange High School campus in the early 70’s. The small, 5-member city council shifts from year to year between a majority that’ll give the university anything it wants, and a majority responsive to homeowners (white AND latino) who don’t want dorms moved in next door.
Partly in response to a controversial $3million parking structure, built by Chapman and the city together using taxpayer money, an ordinance was passed – still in effect – that the university couldn’t BUILD anything new unless it acquired all the properties on that block. And there are always some stubborn homeowners who will refuse to sell. In response to THAT, a mysterious realtor began prowling the town trying to buy up properties and denying any connection to Chapman – but clever detective work uncovered his firm as a front for the university – he was a “blockbuster!” In any case, through all the ups and downs over the years, Chapman IS gradually acquiring everything between its main campus and the train station, including this lovely house to the left, which they managed to get for a lot less than the owner wanted.
The 2009 Gang Injunction desmadre.
SO. This nice neighborhood was caught totally by surprise when one pre-dawn morning in Feb. 2009 SWAT teams busted into dozens and dozens of sleeping homes, hollering with guns drawn and brandishing 6-inch-thick “preliminary injunctions.” Right here is where you should leave my story and read Daffodil Altan’s amazing account in the Weekly of the events of that Spring – I can’t do it justice like she did.
But to summarize – there are two kinds of gang injunctions. The first one the DA and OPD tried to pull off was the kind where individuals are named as gang members and placed under injunction; in their zeal to show how perilous the neighborhood was, and their hubris in never having been challenged before, they served 115 people, most of whom had no criminal history, or none in over a decade. About half of them were MINORS, with no criminal history at all.
If you read Daffodil’s tale, which I am condensing brutally, you also read about community organizer Yvonne Elizondo and her nonprofit “The Bridge,” which serve(d) at-risk, low-income young people, helping them keep out of trouble, stay off drugs, find work and stay in school. It was Yvonne that the kids of the neighborhood flocked to after being served, and she helped them fight back. And the first thing they did was petition – unprecedentedly en masse and successfully – to have Judge Daniel Didier (a law-enforcement yes man who had never met a gang injunction he didn’t like) replaced with a judge who took his responsibilities a little more seriously – the “no-nonsense” Kazuharo Makino.
There are some memorable scenes from that first hearing under Judge Makino that Daffodil omitted because she wasn’t around yet: The Orange PD, seeing 50+ teenaged accused gang members congregated in the courtroom to petition for justice, attempted to arrest them all for breaking the injunction, until Makino read the cops the riot act. One kid, making the mistake of taking an elevator with cops, got beat up by them in the time-honored way: blows in the places that don’t bruise. Cops sitting behind Yvonne as she testified loudly joked about her ass.
Fast forward to the April 2009 hearing: Makino saw clearly that the minors were in a Catch 22 – the 50+ minors attempting to removed themselves from the injunction,
” if not represented formally by a guardian (which involves an application process through the court), cannot obtain an attorney. And without an attorney and legally appointed guardian, the injunction is voidable. ‘A judgment against a minor is voidable by the minor at any time,’ Makino told prosecutors. ‘So why should I issue a preliminary injunction that is immediately voidable?‘”
By the next, May 7 hearing, by which time the ACLU had taken on a few of the cases, and fabled Long Beach civil rights attorney David Haas a few more, and it was clear that Makino was going to let all these kids off the hook, the DA surprised everyone by moving to dismiss the case. “I have a bad feeling about this, Luke,” Han Solo might have said. Sure enough, within days, T-Rack’s gang was back attempting the OTHER type of gang injunction – the LA style – where all you name on the injunction is a “gang,” and then at your leisure decree which men, women and kids are part of that gang. And they DON’T get to argue they’re not part of a gang until after they’ve been arrested for violating the injunction, which almost never works.
Long story short, that is what Judge Fairbank ruled unconstitutional two years later in May 2011, a ruling upheld by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals last month – that “being subject to a gang injunction restricts a person’s basic liberties and that whether or not someone is a gang member is a complex factual question that shouldn’t be decided solely by law enforcement.” (LA Times summary.)
So … it’s all good, right? Well, let’s see what this victory really looks like on the ground…
Vasquez’ Pyrrhic Victory Against Rackauckas.
“…and then, toward the end of the Civil War, the slaves were freed … not so you’d really NOTICE it of course, just sort of ON PAPER.” – George Carlin, 1984
NOW it was personal. Not only did the authorities – the police, DA, city and/or Chapman or whoever, want these people out of the neighborhood for their own reasons, even MORE importantly, now that they were fighting back legally – as NOBODY HAD EVER DONE BEFORE – they HAD TO BE MADE AN EXAMPLE OF.
Orange cops just continued, and continue, to behave as though the Gang Injunction is fully in force, with raids, arrests and harassment – and who in the OC is going to stop them? As I ask after the young people named in Daffodil’s story, “Oh, he finally moved out of the neighborhood. Oh, SHE gave up and moved out too.” And Chapman continues to snap up properties at bargain prices.
The ACLU’s office was vandalized repeatedly, had its internet and power cut repeatedly, and eventually moved out. The feisty Elizondo gave up and left town as well, after endless harassment and targeting of her teenaged children by the OPD. Her nonprofit “The Bridge,” after so many years of vital work in the community, was stripped of county funding and forced to shut down. Real portraits in courage there, Board of Supes. Dangerous group of enemies to make, the OC DA, local police department, and maybe Chapman.
And then late on the night of Wed. Nov 13 – about a week after their “defeat” at the 9th Circuit, enraged Orange cops broke into the houses of at least ten of the “victorious” defendants, holding guns to their heads, ripping up their homes in the vain search for SOMETHING incriminating, and demanding (unsuccessfully) that they admit to being gang members and sign the notorious “STEP card” (which every responsible working-class minority parent warns their kids to NEVER sign.)
And who can the community turn to now? It’s not surprising that these folks say, “Well, if this is what VICTORY looks like…” and then wearily don’t finish the sentence.
Cops and “Criminals,” and the Murder of Sergio.
When you hear talk in Orange about “the criminals,” it’s probably not in reference to generic criminals, it’s probably in reference to the “O.C. Criminals” or “OCC,” a gang of wanna-be first-generation Mexican troublemakers who started out in Santa Ana, kinda petered out there, and are now centered in Orange a mile or two east of the OVC Barrio. To all appearances their main purpose these last couple years has been to try to start trouble in the neighboring OVC area, to try to provoke a response – it’s tempting to suspect at the cops’ urging, as when they start a fistfight the OCC guy will get a slap on the wrist or a few weeks, while the OVC guy will get months. “The Criminals are RATS!” as the OVC people put it. (No, I have not made the acquaintance of a “Criminal” to get their side of things.)
The “Criminals” had a gang injunction put on their neighborhood a year before OVC; it has never actually been used against them, but presumably provides some leverage as they do the cops’ dirty work against the REALLY dangerous people: the century-old neighborhood that is squatting in Chapman’s path, and which has the temerity to fight back!
But on this last July 3, on a sunny afternoon, a shark was jumped of the tragic sort:
Sergio Vasquez‘ first arrest was for defiantly sitting in front of the above mural, which the Orange Police had ridiculously labeled “a gang mural.” All his other arrests stemmed from that and from the gang injunction which has repeatedly been ruled unconstitutional – arrests for hanging out with his big brother Manuel and other friends, for being out late, and for venturing into “forbidden zones.” So by any fair accounting, Sergio led an entirely crime-free life. A straight A student, he earned the nickname Wizard for his skill at science and math.
Last July 3, in the middle of the afternoon, at the age of 20, Sergio was shot in the head with a 9-mm hollow point bullet, by a passing white van driven by a young woman. Witnesses were not able to catch the license plate number, but police were there within a minute, almost as if they’d been expecting this. When paramedics arrived, witnesses heard the police order them to stay away from Sergio’s still-living body: “He’s a gang member, leave him alone.” There was no evident effort to pursue the attackers, but police took the opportunity to raid a lot of houses in the neighborhood – remember, the final hearing before the 9th Circuit was fast approaching and the cops were desperate for any kind of evidence to confirm their baleful descriptions of the scary OVC “gang.”
What are the chances – the law-abiding kid brother of the lead defendant in a suit against the DA?
Just as in the Third World, where there is no trust of the government, no trusting relationship between law enforcement and the people, the people live on rumors. There’s a rumor now that an arrest was made in the case. Who knows? The detective in charge of the case, a Detective Jevec, won’t tell Sergio’s mother anything (or even let her have his stuff), and it’s been five months now. I tried calling Detective Jevec and he sure wouldn’t tell me anything. He referred me to the Orange PD’s Public Information Officer (PIO) who referred me to the Watch Commander, who referred me back to the PIO, and none of them have returned my calls.
Another rumor is that members of the Criminals came by later and threatened Sergio’s mother and brother Manuel that “you’ll be next,” but those two won’t confirm or deny that, so who knows?
What IS documented and videotaped is the OPD’s post-murder harassment of the grieving neighbors and family. Chicanos Unidos has documented and videotaped the all-day harassment of the carwash the neighborhood held to raise funeral costs, and the police’s constant dismantling of any attempted “shrine” to Sergio’s memory. As you can see to the right, neighbors and family will occasionally place votive candles in front of the telephone pole on the corner where he was shot, but police always remove those, and have threatened Sergio’s mother with $2000 fines for each time they “have to do that.” So most of the time his shrine is just a pole filled with rusty nails.
And some deputy DA had the cojones the other day, in a Santa Ana meeting about gang injunctions, to try to use the murder of Sergio as a justification for why gang injunctions are important. Yes, a policy that made this young man’s final four years into a prison and did nothing to protect him from getting gunned down by the cops’ pet gang. That deputy DA, I understand, was shouted down.
Emigdio’s “Proletariado de Aztlan.”
We keep going back to this mural, at the heart of the barrio, which was famed Chicano muralist Emigdio Vasquez‘ 1979 master’s thesis, funded by Cal State Fullerton. For decades this mural was considered a seminal early work of a great and prolific artistic cataloguer of history, until suddenly in 2009, much to Gustavo’s snarky amusement, it was declared a dangerous piece of gang-glorifying art.
A couple of OG’s (guys my age included in the injunction but who haven’t otherwise been in trouble with the law in decades) told me that they thought the problem was the “picture of Che Guevara” toward one side (see detail at right.) I looked and said, “Well, that’s not really a picture of Che, it’s a picture of a picture of Che. The muralist is showing that at one point some local people painted Che on a fence.” They agreed, and actually showed me the original fence, a couple blocks away, that used to have Che on it, and is now almost obscured by tall bushes.
Uncle Paul says the mural is full of neighborhood characters from the 40’s to the 60’s. He can name almost all of them (including his brother in the zoot suit.) HE says that the cops’ excuse for calling it a “gang” mural is that someone at some point made that black car’s license plate read “OVC” … although that was quickly removed.
Also, see that big white smudge in front of the car’s left front tire? That was the OC Criminals’ attempt at defacing the thing (they also tossed white paint at the pachuco’s girlfriend’s mouth, making her resemble a werewolf lady.) I said, “that smudge isn’t so bad, it looks kinda like a splash of water on the car.” Laughed the OG’s, “That’s exactly what Emigdio said, he said keep it!”
Here’s one thing: We mostly only see the side of the mural facing Cypress Street, it actually starts out on the south side which is even bigger. Here’s a view from the corner of the building:
Well, the sun screwed up the south side there, so here’s a NICE picture of the south side. I’ll get Paul to give me more details about the people here:
Something else to know: The owners of this building DID finally sell to Chapman, BUT they did make Chapman put in writing that they’d both restore the mural to its original condition AND keep it there in perpetuity. No problem, I imagine – Chapman may be insatiable for property, but unlike the Orange cops they do have an appreciation of historic art. (I tried to get the OG’s to pose in front of the mural, they thought that would call down more heat on them from either the cops OR the “Criminals”, so instead they took MY picture. Does this make me a gangster now?)
Finally, Emigdio, who also painted the Little People’s Park mural in Anaheim which is sorely in need of renovation, is now 72 and in failing health with a chronic illness. I urge you all to see a slideshow of his beautiful work at his website – most of it actually is a lot better than the above.
Emigdio Vasquez, born 1939 in Arizona.