Irvine Council Approves Veterans Cemetery Resolution That May Arm AB 1453

 Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Sharon Quirk-Silva’s AB 1453, which would have the state commission a new veterans cemetery in Orange County, could be one of two things: (1) a symbolic but ultimately ineffectual statement of support that got nothing done, or (2) the means to actually get a cemetery built.

For it to be the latter, some donor had to stand up and say that they were willing to give the state the land, so that it could then apply for federal funding through the Department of Veterans Affairs.  (It could also be sold to the state — but the state has not been particularly interested in that.)

Such a donor could be private — but that wasn’t likely.  Finding a public donor would also be hard.  The only public donor with appropriate land that was obviously available and possibly willing was the City of Irvine, which had a 125-acre parcel of the Great Park left over, one that was not owned by Lennar or Five Point.  So on Tuesday night, Irvine voted on whether they were willing to seriously consider giving the state the land.

This wasn’t going to be a commitment, which the state would really like.  And it wasn’t specifying the Great Park site; if another Irvine site became available, that would be just fine, so far as this resolution went.  But it would probably be enough of a gesture to get AB 1453 past its initial hurdles — at which point it would tend to pick up steam.  So, in a sense, this was a make or break vote for really actually getting a veteran’s cemetery in Irvine — potentially the last best chance to do so for a long time.

Drumroll, please!

Proponents of the veterans cemetery won.  The critical vote was 3-2, with Jeff Lalloway joining Larry Agran and Beth Krom in rejecting a substitute amendment by Christine Shea with the support of Mayor Steven Choi.  That amendment would have delayed the decision process long enough that AB 1453 would not be able to be approved by the deadlines imposed by the legislative calendar.  (Once the killer amendment was rejected, Choi joined Lalloway in voting for the final bill — but however many people he thinks that will fool, this blog will make sure that it fools fewer than that.)

Irvine Council votes to move towards Great Park Veterans Cemetery

Christine Shea looks unhappy and Stephen Choi seems to think he successfully pulled a fast one, but it was a majority of Larry Agran, Beth Krom, and Jeff Lalloway who kept alive the dream of actually building an Orange County Veterans Cemetery in this decade.

Orange Juice Blog will have a more extensive story on this development sometime tomorrow.  But that’s the big news; in the meantime, see this preview story from Monday for more details about the deal generally.  (And there are plenty of more details about this vote — it was quite a meeting!)

About Greg Diamond

Prolix worker's rights and government accountability attorney and General Counsel of CATER. His anti-corruption work in Anaheim infuriated the Building Trades and Teamsters in spring 2014, leading them to work with the Democratic Party of Orange County Chair and other co-conspirators (who had long detested the internal oversight his presence provided) to remove him from the position of DPOC North Vice Chair of in violation of party rules and any semblance of due process. He also runs for office sometimes. Unless otherwise specifically stated, none of his writings prior to that lawless putsch ever spoke for the Democratic Party at the local, county, state, national, or galactic level. He tries to either suppress or openly acknowledge his partisan, issue, ideological, and "good government" biases in most of his writing here. If you have a question about any particular writing, just ask him about it and (unless you are an pseudonymous troll) he will probably answer you at painful length. He lives in Beautiful Bountiful Brea, but while he may brag about it he generally doesn't blog about it. A family member works as a campaign treasurer for candidates including Wendy Gabriella in AD-73; he doesn't directly profit from that relatively small compensation and it doesn't affect his coverage. He does advise some campaigns informally and (except where noted) without compensation.