Report from CA GOP Convention – Republicans Going Backwards.

Anaheim seems to be home to the California Republican Party’s favorite southern home for convention activities. This report on the convention centers on our platform, which was released a year after the governor’s election. The platform has been contentious, for at least the last generation.

Of course, this weekend there were some special guests from Donald Trump to Senator Tim Scott attending, but not all the delegates and guests had the 150-500 dollars for attending these dinners and lunches. Some of us would rather buy LA Rams tickets.

Activists question the Party’s positions on abortion and “family values” – some say these positions sustain the health of the party, while others say they’re electoral death, while Democrats use them as wedge issues to beat our candidates. (See Assembly Districts 40 and 76 for example.)

Do we Republicans need to regain a relationship with people of color and religious groups like Muslims and Hindus in order to once again gain a foothold in our state? As a former candidate I learned that GOTV does make a difference and the district lines made by the “Independent, but really progressive groups” may not be beautiful works of art, but we must work with them. We can’t just simply endorse the best Democrat; we must run candidates in those districts. As ghastly as the redistricting lines may be, we Republicans must work that much harder. Knock on those doors and reach out during neighborhood events to reclaim the lost ground.

We Republicans have a flaw – we do not plan and we just want the easy route, but we must do the challenging work to change California for the better. Moderates and reformers feel that our platform is basically a weapon the Democratic Party uses against us, Conservatives feel that we need to distinguish ourselves dramatically from Democrats. But right now the Democratic Party being pushed so far to the left – crime is rewarded, explicit library books are available to school children, and with the ambivalence towards our energy issues there is plenty for Republicans to speak up about besides abortion and the LGBT issues.

Religious voters say if we turn against them, they will walk away and not be as engaged. Those 16,000 ballots collected at the local mega-church in my AD might dwindle down to 1/10th the amount if we betray them. Perhaps Republicans should give the religious and conservative voters four years to prove their point. If Republicans fail to win elections, then maybe our platform needs to be buzz sawed to oblivion even if demanding work does not make a difference. If they can pull some upset victories in the state legislature such as the socially conservative Inland Valley, then we can carry on as usual because they would earn a mandate for better or worse.

I am not asking for us to have a drag performance at our Sunday general meeting or feminist beanies being passed out in our convention tote bags to celebrate abortion rights. Voters do not want total restrictions or total allowance for abortions overall. I support states having the freedom to limit or have a defined limit for elective abortion at the end of the 12th week for states who refuse to have stricter limits. Look at Ohio and Kansas, they are not exactly bastions of progressive politics, but they know when one side goes off the deep end.

The question we need to ask is if we refuse to compromise, are we ready to become more irrelevant like the Hawaiian Republican Party or West Virgina Democratic Party? Democrats are steamrolling us on many issues and helping the state becoming more irrelevant by the day. We need people to become Republicans even though the orthodoxy may be out of place, but we need modernization.

If the platform needs to be reformed there needs to be a better process in which the state party would determine what the delegates want. We should have a scoping session during the first convention of the year after a governor’s election. The focus group study would be distributed to the delegates so we can understand what the membership wants. Then the drafting committee meeting used to debate the drafting document should only be the exclusive meeting held. The 2023 drafting committee was run after an executive committee meeting where it made the facilitators ram through the submitted amendments. Also, we need a provision that bans any draft platform from being stealthy submitted. A future amendment should advocate for draft platforms must be on display on the state party website for at least five business days before the drafting committee meeting.

The reformers who tried to moderate the platform should have remembered the platform fight of 2011 which made delegates angry which led to the 2008 document carried over to 2012. If we fail to remember our history, we are always doomed to repeat our mistakes. We need a fresh document that talks about 2023 issues, not issues from 2008, 2012, 2015, 2019. There are articles from 2011 that discuss the failures of pushing thru the 2011 draft document that should have been read from Assemblyman Wallis, Assemblyman Mathis, and the Chairman of the Los Angeles County Party Tim O’Reilly. Learning from these mistakes will help the reformers do better in 2027.

I may not be happy at what happened during the convention for what went on in the platform, but do we have those missing voters to win those elections with our current document or can we have voters return home to the Republican Party as demonstrated in Congressional Districts 47 and 49 where we lost those districts. There are cities across this state have shown weaker Republican Party performance since Trump was elected in 2016. College educated voters and women are not buying what we are selling. I love California, but the voters who are voting for Democrats are killing our state. It is tragic that delegates sent our state party to its doom because they feel that they would rather sell California to the wolves instead of risking spiritual death for compromising. Politics is about the art of compromise just as how Trump authored a book about the art of the deal and it’s ironic how many of the platform defenders have values contrary to Trump’s personal values.

One big question I would like to ask much of our party is how can we protect children if we cannot win elections? It seems our failure to win hearts and minds of our state is the reason why our children are threatened by the legislation our Democrats write?

The problem is many of the gains made for LGBT people in the Republican Party in California are at risk of being undone. However, with California having Republicans leave by the dozen each hour to other states, we need to add more people to our coalition. Some of the religious radicals want to eradicate non-straight and gender non-conforming members out of the party and banish us to Siberia like how the Texas state party has done for generations.

If you are an independent voter as no party preference, or a Democrat who is looking to walk away, be a critical voter this upcoming election year. Ask about their positions about inclusion of LGBT people in the Republican Party, not all of us believe that minors should be allowed to transition via medication or have surgeries such as total breast removals. Not all of us believe that smutty library books should be purchased for minors with taxpayer money. Sadly, a good segment of the religious faction in the

Republican Party still carries ignorant stereotypes about people like us. There is no fault in abstention if none of the candidates are worthy of your vote. Make inclusion one of your key factors in how you vote.

Matthew Munson was the first out San Bernardino County Party central committee member and served on the California Republican Party Committee from 2003-2004, 2014-2024.

About Matt Munson