.
.
.
Fullerton City Council member and friend of the (Vern portion of) the blog Bruce Whitaker, has announced — as reported on the pages of the not-only-renascent-but-back-in-fighting-form Friends 4 Fullerton’s Future (which we will blog roll as soon as we find a link to its RSS feed) — that he will run to replace State Senator Josh Newman in the recall election that may or may not take place to replace him. Thus far the Republican Party has put forward former Assemblywoman and hapless State Senate candidate Ling-Ling Chang as its expected standard bearer. The entry of Whitaker into the race may change the calculus of other potential Republican challengers, perhaps bringing in Republicans such as Tim Shaw (at least if the election doesn’t take place on the June primary date, when Shaw has a date with Young Kim in the Supervisor’s race, Whitaker’s colleague Jennifer Fitzgerald, one or more of the of various discordant malcontents from Placentia and Yorba Linda, and perhaps even Disney’s red-headed stepchild Lucille Kring or its violent golden boy Steve Lodge. Once state GOP Chair Jim Brulte no longer has the unchallenged authority to anoint the winner — because look how well THAT worked in 2016! — God knows what will happen, because Chang is not a widely respected figure on the Republican side. (Is the Ling-Ling Lies website still up?)
On the Democratic side, strict party discipline will ensure that no one presents themselves as a challenger to Newman, and — ahahahahaha, who are we kidding? We could see someone like Sukhee Kang move back into the district! (If that happens, expect to see other Democrats jump in to block Kang or whoever, because Democrats really don’t want a candidate who might encourage Democrats to vote against Newman in the hope of picking up a seat for their own faction, even if it’s a small faction.) Whitaker would probably keep a Libertarian out of the race, but one could imagine a Green candidate or an American Independent candidate (say, Wiley Drake?) in the race if they think they have a chance to steal the seat. (And, with enough Republicans running, they might!) On the other hand, Newman is quite popular with Democrats outside of some dead-enders in various bunkers of the local party, so there will be a tendency to accede to his wishes.
On its face, Whitaker’s entry into the race would seem like bad news for Newman. However, given the enmity between the libertarian (what Vern calls “honest conservative”) faction of the local GOP and the “state socialist conservative” (or whatever they call the other one these days) faction — the latter of which did not show up to support Chris Norby in 2012, leading to the initial election of Sharon Quirk Silva in AD-55, most of the bottom half of SD-29 — one could imagine that either side would rather see Newman stay in office until 2020 than to see the seat grabbed for a dozen years by its rival.
Curiouser and curiouser! Well, maybe it will all still get tossed out in court. But that likelihood may not be as high as the almost certainty that someone’s inspired strategy — and maybe everyone’s — is going to blow up in their own face!
*Bruce should run for Supervisor…..plain and simple. He takes Shawn’s spot in heartbeat. The Newman issue is “too iffy”. Bruce is the natural selection for Supervisor.
He plays too ‘in party” many games to go after Newman’s spot. What happens even if he gets the spot? Not much.
Bruce and natural selection don’t belong in the same sentence.
Oh — you’re from the “only God could have created this” school of thought?
*How about Todd Boy running after T-Rack? Todd should be printing those T-Shirts now: “Reserve Officer OCS!”
*America….Kelly Thomas…smoke filled rooms…..date with an angel….death of a tyrant..the last temptation of Christ…..hokey pokey…..Life is a Magazine….”Busted Balls by One Hung Low….” “Under the Grandstands …by I P Freely” “40 Yards ot the Outhouse by Will E. Makeit” Politics 101 says….just do the right thing and certainly do not follow the drinking gourd. We are truly hopeful that Bruce and Linda…..will do the right thing.. This of course means that Dick Ackerman is not involved in the process.
*So to be blunt…Bruce and Linda should not be running for anything but Supervisor…… in their career legacy goal department.
“Linda”?
*Bruce’s wife!
But Linda’s NOT running for anything!
That’s a major fundraising concern with Young Kim in the race.
I think this is a smart choice. Main issue being contested (taxation) is right in his wheelhouse.
Let’s see what he can do!
Agreed. The Legislature is about principles applied to policy. The County is all about governance. Or in the case of OC, lack of governance.
As a Republican, I am not comfortable about Bruce for one big reason he is a regional government advocate who wants crap like road diets, stack and pack housing and stuff like that. As a committee member for LA and SB County, he will get a nay vote from me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4qg3wSAzuA&feature=youtu.be
Ron and Anna wishing Bruce Whitaker will do the right thing unfortunately based on my experience with him and his voting record is a pipe dream.
The self-professed constitutional limited government conservative voted to appoint Ma’Ayn Johnson, a Southern California Association of Governments (S.CA.G.) Planner and Agenda 21 advocate to our Fullerton Planning Committee. No true conservative or any Republican for that matter would support someone who works for the largest Government funded, non-elected agency in the entire country. They are the granddaddy of taxation without direct representation. Yet Bruce Whitaker on the dais stated that there were 17 good candidates for that planning committee position yet phony Bruce voted for Ma’Ayn. Please go to fullertoninformer.com where you can read many additional posts for more factual information about Bruce Whitaker and his 6 plus year record of failure on the Fullerton City Council.
Please note that Bruce Whitaker has stated repeatedly that it is not his fault that he can’t get anything accomplished because he is only one vote out of five. The fact is that during his entire time on the council, Republicans have held either 3 or 4 out of the five seats. In other words the majority. Now he wants us to believe that he can get something accomplished in Sacramento where his party represents approximately 1/3 of the State Senate.
Only a few weeks ago he went on the record that he was very interested in running for the OC Supervisory position, i.e. Shawn Nelson’s seat and almost overnight he now wants to be our next State Senator. It is clear to me that the real reason he is running is to get a big 6 figure paycheck plus very generous benefits for a part-time job no less. In my humble opinion, someone seeking higher office should have a resume of some accomplishments at their current position. All Bruce can point to is fireworks, voting to make Jennifer Fitzgerald our mayor and voting for the high-density, high-rise developers redistricting map that basically disenfranchises those citizens who live in the downtown area.
Didn’t he fire you as his parks commissioner? And doesn’t that make you, um, biased? Why should I believe you?
David Zenger I am not asking you or anyone else to believe me on faith but rather to believe the facts I presented above and in the many posts I wrote on http://www.fullertoninformer.com. As I stated above no limited government libertarian leaning conservative which Bruce Whitaker states he is would ever support a S.C.A.G employee and an United Nations Agenda 21 supporter. That is the truth and you can do with it as you wish sir.
The only “fact” you presented was that Whitaker voted for someone for mayor which is most likely because Fullerton has a policy of mayorship rotation. Everything else was an expression of your personal opinion, likes or dislikes. Those aren’t facts. It’s obvious you have a personal problem with Whitaker, the facts of which I am not in the least interested in learning about.
I’ve been warned about your website. Sorry, I avoid contact with people who believe the Earth is flat. It’s bad for business.