
Reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act passed the House of Representatives today with the votes of all three OC Democrats and half of OC’s Republicans. Care to guess who was naughty and who was nice — or halfway nice?
We routinely praise Orange County Congressmembers Alan Lowenthal, Linda Sanchez, and Loretta Sanchez on this site (along with some occasional criticism), and we don’t often praise Ed Royce and Darrel Issa, so it’s nice to get a chance to do the latter as well. We wish that that had more company in being worthy of praise today. Specifically, we wish that Reps. John Campbell and Dana Rohrabacher were not embarrassments to our enlightened county.
For those of you who haven’t been following the story, reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act — the landmark 1994 law that assists victims of domestic and sexual violence — has been stalled in the House of Representatives because Republicans wanted to eliminate some or all protections for lesbians and transgendered women, Native Americans on reservations, and unauthorized residents. (That last is usually “undocumented workers” or “illegal immigrants” to various of our readers.) It finally passed today, without those exclusions, on a vote of 286-138 — that is, 199 Democrats and 87 Republican Ayes and 138 Republican Nays. Seven representatives, six of them Republican (including our erstwhile former Congressman Gary Miller) did not vote at all.
So: our thanks to those members of OC’s Congressional delegation who did the right thing in this vote! Let’s let the New York Times give some background:
Though the reauthorization passed the Senate earlier this month with 78 votes — including those of every woman, all Democrats and just over half of Republicans — a version unveiled by the House last Friday immediately came under sharp criticism from Democrats and women’s and human rights groups for failing to include certain provisions offered in the Senate bill.
The House bill excluded specific protections for gay, bisexual or transgender victims of domestic abuse — eliminating “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” from a list of “underserved populations” that face barriers to receiving victim services — and stripped certain provisions regarding Native American women on reservations.
Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, the majority leader, had committed to passing the legislation in the House only with bipartisan support. On Tuesday night, with House Democrats firmly united against the Republican version, the House Rules Committee approved a bifurcated process to consider the Senate legislation; on Thursday, the House first voted on its substitute amendment and then, when that version failed to pass, it took up and passed the Senate version.
On Thursday, Democrat after Democrat stood on the House floor, urging their colleagues to reject what they said was the weaker House version and to vote for the underlying Senate-passed bill.
By the way, to trot out the “let’s discriminate against people we don’t like” substitute, the Republicans went to their sole women in their leadership, Rep. Cathy McMorris Rogers (R-WA). Having thus humiliated herself, she was able to get away with supporting the final bill.
Still, those discriminatory measures are troubling — and in some ways even more troubling for people who were willing to pass the bill even without them. How did our fair county’s delegation do on that vote?
Well, to his credit, Darrell Issa voted against stripping the protection against these classes of women from that bill. Thank you, Rep. Issa — you surprised me in standing with only 59 other Republicans in taking this position. (I still think that you’re nuts, but you showed a good side of yourself today.) Ed Royce, though — yes, you guessed it: Ed Royce voted for the bill that would remove these restrictions, despite his willingness to support the bill even if he lost. Was it the lesbians who bothered him? The Native Americans? Those here without legal status? Someone on speaking terms with him will have to be the one to find out; he won’t talk to me.
So, since Vern has taking to grading politicians, let’s give out grades for just this pair of votes:
Linda Sánchez: A
Loretta Sanchez: A
Alan Lowenthal: A
Darrell Issa: AEd Royce: C/C-
John Campbell: F
Dana Rohrabacher: F
Our compliments to Congress for renewing VAWA. We hope those as few people as possible in Orange County ever need its benefits, but we’re glad that it’s there for them.
It seems former OC congressman Gary Miller voted for VAWA.
Nope. He was one of 7 not voting.
How many of these same politicians also voted to send women to the front lines in armed conflicts?
Voting to curb domestic violence and to improve service equality are incompatible?
Are you asking who was consistent in supporting women’s self-determination and consent? Find me the bill number and I’ll check.
What’s Wrong with the Violence Against Women Act?
“Some feminist researchers have reason to criticize mandatory arrest laws: They say the policies do nothing to address the causes of intimate partner violence, which is highly correlated with unemployment and economic distress. (IMO – Obamanomics)
Researchers say, mandatory arrest laws remove the preferences of abused women from a process that can leave them financially strapped and worried that the state will take custody of their children. “When you institute a mandatory arrest policy, the hope is that you will control the police and make sure they respond,” says Donna Coker, a former battered women’s shelter worker and now a law professor at the University of Miami. “But too often, it has the unintended consequence of increasing the potential for state control of marginalized women.”
Read more: http://nation.time.com/2013/02/27/whats-wrong-with-the-violence-against-women-act/#ixzz2MEwf7PYv
Do you think that Congress had been made aware of this view, or do you think that these scholars just wanted TIME Magazine to have an exclusive?
I think that the law of unintended consequences applies in many instances – including with this law.
I can tell you what is wrong with it, it is sexist. All violence should be prosecuted.
Did someone say that violence against men shouldn’t be prosecuted? But you agree that we need more fire protection in the places that are tinder dry and have a history of burning, right?
*”Cigars, cigarettes Tiparillos?” Come on Dana….it is OK…….Raptors were in the
movie…..but T-Rex?
*The Republican Majority in Arkansas has just passed a NO Abortions for those poor
women in Arkansas up to 20 Weeks! Welcome to going back in time. Welcome to
what Republicans in California will soon be bringing us. Who are these fools? Do
they live on another planet? First the Governors of South Carolina and Wisconsin
and now this……whew!
*The President signed this bill today…..
After Biden made a great speech about it … I could listen to Biden all day.