.
This is exactly the right decision —
and people who are happy that PPACA was upheld but thought that it should be upheld on Commerce Clause terms
are as wrong on CNN.
More as the day progresses. Your thoughts are welcome...
I look forward to the day where things get back to normal-ish and I too will find a few good…
Thank you for your service. An indispensable guide and source of laughter during these times. I share your enthusiasm for…
Yeah, you’re probably good, the Democrats and the ant-ICE people are backing you. I know Kathy from years ago, we…
Hi there, this is Shane, running for Mayor of San Clemente. I know you recommended Kathy Ward in this editorial,…
What is their opinion on vegetarians, however?
Rhonda Shader has endorsed the wasteful, extremist, and unqualified trustees on our school board. She is part of the most…
[…] post was originally published on this […]
It's a tribute to the "fire fighters" and cop unions that they get evermore benefits and pay as their jobs…
So they let the Louzeau’s get away with killing this woman just because she partied with their sister? Are they…
Nice summary, glad you followed up on comments to amend your content. 4th district Justice Joanne Motoike Cannot find any…
I personally think that they probably made the right decision in not upholding the mandate on Commerce Clause grounds (i.e. forcing someone to buy something just because they are living- my interpretation, probably not the courts) and instead calling it a tax. Although, I am surprised that the courts said it was a tax since it was my recollection that the Administration’s argument was that it was not a tax- maybe they did not argument that before the SCOTUS but I thought that it was played out that way during the legislative process. It feels like a tax and the government has a right to tax and looks like those who voted for it will have to say that they raised taxes on a lot of people, but I presume that they would think that the tax is worth the benefit.
From Mitt Romney’s website:
“As president, Mitt will nominate judges in the mold of Chief Justice Roberts…”
(HT: Andrew Sullivan, The Dish)
hmmm… that’s a pretty abrupt ellipsis, I have a feeling it continued, “…Antonin Scalia and Sam Alito.” Sully wouldn’t be doing a FOX News on us, would he?
Plus, Roberts is Mr. Citizens United more than anything else; I appreciate him fixing up Obama’s law and handing it back to him with a bow on it, but it’s easy to see how a corporatist wouldn’t mind Obamacare. Today we will celebrate Roberts’ reasoned decision; tomorrow he’s a villain again for the vast body of his work.
*The brouhaha over what is a tax…is a crack up. The Family Child Tax Credit….is only for people with Children. The Home Owners Exemption…is only for Homeowners…..the Business Expense Deductions are for only people with Businesses…….
As you can see the TAX CODE is not equitable or fair to all ….is it? Every tax deduction for medical expenses that exceed a certain percentage of your income again is never equitable.
The money given to various Federally Approved Charities in amounts to choke a horse are also write-offs and not equitable. What you pay for Car or Health Insurance are also payments that may or may not be considered tax write-offs for various people.
So….they just expaned who gets the write-off and who needs pay to get it. Healthcare..that is.
ThaT is one fucked SCOTUS Ruling.
skallwag – 17 million people thank you for your insight! But don’t believe it.
The citizens of Massachusetts are happy that Romney care has been saved. Anyone who wants to know how the tax will work should ask Romney – he devised it.