A week ago our blogger Sean Mill broke the story that the restaurant owned by Supervisor Janet Nguyen’s husband, Tom Bonikowski-Nguyen, and her Chief of Staff, Andrew Do, had once again been issued several Orange County Health violations, including two major violations.
We are still waiting for the blue hacks at the Liberal OC to even mention to their readers that Nguyen voted against restaurant health ratings and of course it comes as no surprise that they are not going to let their readers know about these latest violations, even though Liberal OC editor Chris Prevatt works for the Orange County Health Department.
Instead, Prevatt is attacking Mill for going after these foul Republicans! Prevatt wrote this comment ripping Mill in a recent post:
As the “community blogger” who first raised the question of Van Tran’s involvement in this matter, I do appreciate Deepa at the Register getting the answers to some of those questions.
I now get to ask the next question of one of the “community bloggers” who came to the valiant defense of Councilman Quach and Assemblyman Tran. This particular blogger, a Democrat and Santa Ana Planning Commissioner appointed by Sal Tinajero suggested that Quach’s intoxicated driving was somehow less of a threat to public safety than health code violations at a Lee’s Sandwich shop.
Sean Mill, why again are you standing up for a drunk driving councilman and his investigation obstructing mentor Van Tran? Where is your outrage over the people who served so much alcohol to Quach that he couldn’t get a quarter of a mile down the road? How can someone with such questionable judgment as you sit in judgement over conditional use permits in Santa Ana? Your lack of good judgment reflects poorly not just on you, but also on Councilman Sal Tinajero.
Not that you have the integrity of character to do so, but you should resign immediately from the Santa Ana Planning Commission. You should do so for the good of the people of Santa Ana, and your friend Sal Tinajero.
Don’t drag him down into the same pit of slime in which you dwell.
Where do I even start with this libelous stew? Mill DID NOT defend Quach – that is a total lie. What Mill did was illustrate to our readers the fact that BOTH the Trannies AND the Jannies are a threat to public health. Quach had a blood alcohol level of .26, allegedly, when he crashed last Saturday night. But the restaurant owned by Janet Nguyen’s husband and Chief of Staff has had almost 40 health violations! Thousands of people die of food poisoning every year in this country – no wonder Janet voted against restaurant health ratings!
But Prevatt does not care if anyone dies after eating at Tom and Andrew’s restaurant, which is a Lees Sandwiches franchise in Stanton. Prevatt simply continues to give free passes to Janet – and that is becuase he is a JANNIE through and through.
Now you have to wonder, why would Prevatt, a supposedly liberal Democrat, be interested in defending Janet Nguyen? She has proven to be anything but a moderate. She voted to deny funding to important health programs for women, run by Planned Parenthood. Prevatt NEVER mentioned this at all on his blog!
Janet voted to spend money on new furniture for her office and she also supported remodeling the County lobby at her office, while the Supervisors were laying off Prevatt’s fellow county workers!
And now Janet is threatening to run against Democratic State Senator Lou Correa, according to my sources. I wonder if Prevatt will even support Correa? I doubt it!
Mill is not the bad guy – Janet’s husband and her chief of staff are – but not in Prevatt’s world. It apparently does not matter to Prevatt that Janet’s Chief of Staff, Andrew Do, defeated Democrat Robin Marcario last year for the Garden Grove City Council. There are rumors that Do STILL does not even live in Garden Grove, but you sure as hell won’t read about that at the Liberal OC!
And Janet got her hubby, Tom, appointed to the Garden Grove Planning Commission. Here then is the BIGGEST irony. Prevatt is calling on Mill to resign from the Santa Ana Planning Commission because he exposed the fact that Tom’s restaurant keeps racking up health violations. But shouldn’t Prevatt be going after REPUBLICAN Tom Bonkowski-Nguyen, who was put on the Garden Grove Planning Commission even though he runs a restaurant that keeps getting health violations?
Prevatt also went after me last year when I ran for the Santa Ana City Council, even though I was endorsed by Planned Parenthood and ECCO. He helped to reelect REPUBLICAN Santa Ana Councilman Carlos Bustamante, who was himself forced to resign from two state commissions last year after he made comments about Sheriff Hutchens that constituted harassment!
Prevatt in fact joined his fellow Republican loving blogger, Dan Chmielenski, in supporting a hit piece against me last year that was designed by Red County blogger Matt “Jerbal” Cunningham, and funded by Republicans including Mike Schroeder, a bunch of Trannies, and Judy Ware!
Prevatt also recently banned fellow Democrat Paul Lucas from commenting on his sinking blog. But Prevatt is always thrilled when Jerbal shows up at his blog, even though Jerbal works every day to take out Democrats, except of course for Tom Daly, who is another Prevatt favorite. All Lucas did was go after Janet – and he was right!!!!!
Why does Prevatt call his blog the Liberal OC? Shouldn’t he call it the Jannie OC? Or better yet, given that Prevatt DOESN’T EVEN LIVE HERE, shouldn’t he call it the Jannie Long Beach?
Matt Cunningham outed sex-abuse victims.
Art,
Your argument is a little weak. Have there been any illnesses related or linked to the restaurant you are talking about? Has it been shut down, even temporarily? From what I can find, the answer is no.
And what is this new enhanced food safety program that Prevatt talks about over on TheLiberalOC? Isn’t this the result of Board direction regarding improvements to the program?
Also, you do no that Planning Commissioners have no say regarding health code violations but the do have say as to whether a business can serve alcohol, right?
Seems you are trying to make something out of nothing. But that is your style afterall.
“Now you have to wonder, why would Prevatt, a supposedly liberal Democrat, be interested in defending Janet Nguyen?”
Art,
One of my friends on the 5th floor told me that Chris Prevatt has a deal with Janet Nguyen that protects him from being laid off with his fellow county employees if he refrains from criticizing Janet on his blog.
Chris does not have the seniority and credentials to justify his not being laid off with his fellow employees at the health care agency. Chris does not even have a bachelor’s degree from any university because he never went to college.
Chris Prevatt is shilling for Janet simply to save his job. And as a result, his fellow employees who have advanced degrees including masters and PhDs are laid off while he gets to keep his 60K(+) job by simply being a shill for Janet Nguyen.
Now is this fair? Is this how a good “Liberal” is supposed to conduct himself?
#2,
So we’re supposed to wait for Tom’s clients to start dropping like flies? That’s whack!
Of course Prevatt is shilling for the County’s watered down program, according to one of our commenter’s he is shilling in order to keep his job!
I wonder how many businesses have had to contribute to Janet before Tom will approve their permits?
Take a look at when Prevatt began his attacks against Paul Lucas and myself. They started as soon as Lucas and I started to go after Janet Nguyen or the Janny’s.
Chris and the other Janny’s started in with their lies and attacks against both of us because we would capitulate to the Janny line.
Look at the lies he and the other Janny’s are trying to spread now. As anyone who can read can see, apparently Prevatt can’t, I am hardly defending or praising Tran or Quach in my post. I am not a fan of either and I can’t wait for Loretta to whack Van in the congressional race.
In fact in my post I took a whack at Quach for his alleged drunk driving incident. My mortal sin in the eyes of Prevatt was that a took a swipe at Janet Nguyen too.
You would think that an alleged “liberal” like Prevatt would be happy that folks were taking on threats to our party like Tran and Janet, but for some reason he wants the criticism of Janet silenced.
He and the other Janny’s have gone so far as to say I am working for Van Tran and perhaps Sal Tinajero is too. They have accused Sal of stabbing Loretta in the back because I criticized Janet. Can someone please explain that logic to me.
Prevatt has a history of going after Democrats, in particular minority Democrats. He despises Lou Correa and bad mouths regularly, he visciously attack a Vietnamese Democratic candidate last year and has been involved in a slanderous whisper campaign started by right-wingers that is targeting a local elected official who is Hispanic.
If what poster #3 says is correct we now see why Prevatt has taken to kissing Janny tail. Its all about self preservation and not surprisingly he is throwing his union brothers and sisters under the bus for his own benefit.
Prevatt and the other Janny’s try to intimidate anyone who opposes Janet into silence. That is what he is doing with the lies he is spreading about me now. Not gonna work Chris.
Considering his blog gets only a handful of readers daily, when Chris Prevatt throws a hissy fit does anyone hear it?
I wanna run against “Loretta Airhead #1”
Battle of the Airheads 2010
OC voters love airheads….
Pedroza and Mill, you both are doing same thing. You do not even allow people truthfully respond to your crapola accusations.
So why are you constantly acting like a victim if it is you who is victimizer.
You two are beyond the help.
We need to recall Janet Nguyen!!!!!
She is an embarrasment to the Asian community!!!!!
I should add that you two, Pedroza and Mill, were the biggest Jannies out there. So let some one else to take over from you.
I bet that if Janet wouldn’t dump you, as inferior politicians, you would be still Jannies….. so pleassssssss!
#9,
Mill was NEVER in any way allied with Janet.
I gave her the benefit of the doubt. I dislike the Trannies mightily and hoped she would be different.
She ended up being just another partisan red hack.
She has shown her true colors time and again.
Here is my challenge to you and Prevatt – tell me exactly what she has done that merits the support of progressives, liberals and Democrats?
Have you noticed Pedroza that you hate your past?
You were anti-Mexican… now you hate them
You were anti-gay… now you hate them
You were SantaAnaCitizen… now you hate them
You were partisan red hack… now you hate them
You were Jannie…. now you hate them
I can keep going on and on.
Maybe there is something wrong with you?
It can’t be a sign of your social evolution?… could?
If yes than you have long way to go!
Art lol, Sean not so much:P
Never mind Jannies, you two are jennies!.
The two parties, dem/repub are no different, they are exactly the same, one tells you the stupid crap they are going to do, they other does it behind your back!
All of those Orange County Supervisors are just like any politican, they go with the money flow, screw their parties ideology!
Here is my challenge to you and Prevatt – tell me exactly what she has done that merits the support of progressives, liberals and Democrats?
If she is republican she should be doing nothing to support, progressives,liberals and Democrats!
Am i right or am i right!
Michele,
And yet the Jannies are supporting her – so what is up? The only reasonable theory is that Prevatt is playing ball because he is afraid he will get fired otherwise.
I do concur that most politicians suck, regardless of their red or blue affiliations.
The point of this post however is that it is ridiculous for the overtly partisan blue hacks at Liberal OC to back Janet Nguyen. She is no friend to their party – indeed she is useless to her constituents in general.
#6 never a truer word was said,”nice”!.
The point of this post however is that it is ridiculous for the overtly partisan blue hacks at Liberal OC to back Janet Nguyen. She is no friend to their party – indeed she is useless to her constituents in general.
And is this not my point??
They back her for a reason and that reason can only be perks or money!.
I trust None of them, None!
#9,
I never and I repeat never supported Janet Nguyen. I supported Umberg and Hoa and will support Solorio or any other Democrat running against her.
I have been solidly against her from the get go. I don’t have a clue where you would think I was ever a “Janny”.
She is a back stabbing under handed snake. Her vote against Chief Walters solidified my beliefs about her and showed me I was right about her all along.
“I never and I repeat never supported Janet Nguyen”… exactly.
In fact, I know that it was your lack of Janet Nguyen support in your capacity as the Tinajero’s ambassador and Pedroza’s badmouthing in lieu of the Tinajero/Martinez/Mill triangle — the straw that broke the camel’s back — forcing Janet Nguyen to vote against Chief Walters for the Sheriff.
Thanks!
Can you guys prove any of your allegations that Prevatt is being “protected” by Nguyen? If she is protecting him then she is one powerful County Supervisor. Of course, Prevatt would need to be actually doing something that needs protection. He started taking potshots at county management back in 2003. So who exactly was protecting him before Janet came along?
Can you prove that Prevatt has less senority than other laid off employees in the Health Care Agency. You can’t, because you’re talking through your crap hole.
In fact, a grand total of ZER0 Health Care Agency employees have been laid off. If you check out the contracts for county workers you will find out that layoffs are done by, agency first, job classification second, and seniority third. Nobody in his agency or job classification has been laid off. I think Prevatt has worked for the county for more than 12 years, that’s a lot of senority, and by the way his job does not require a college degree.
The claim that others with more senority have been laid off is not just not true.
Prevatt has criticized Janet Nguyen many times. Your selective memory has caused you to forget that fact. The fact that Prevatt was critical of Hoa Van Tran and the unethical conduct of his campaign is not a sign of support for Janet Nguyen. It was an indictment of Hoa Van Tran’s failure as a leader of his campaign and as a candidate.
Art, aren’t you always complaining that “Blue County” never rips on bad democrats. They did with Hoa, but because he was running against Nguyen somehow that makes Prevatt a Jannie? Prevatt has been critical of Lou Correa and Loretta Sanchez, but he has also knocked on doors campaigning for both of them in their last elections. Your complaints just doesn’t make any sense.
And Art, you didn’t just give Janet Nguyen the benefit of the doubt, you were one of her leading advocates. Maybe you should go back and read what you wrote, it might jog your memory.
And finally Art, from what I hear, your got the ECCO endorsement in part because of a recommendation from Prevatt. Your support of marriage equity seemed at the time to make you a logical choice for their endorsement. But given your strong anti-labor stance, don’t count on getting that endorsement if you ever choose to run for anything again.
So really, are wild, unsubstantiated, and totally false allegations the best you can come up with?
Seriously guys, you need to go back on your meds.
#18,
So why didn’t Prevatt criticize Janet after she voted against the proposed restaurant health ratings? She had a clear conflict of interest as her hubby owns a restaurant that has been issued a plethora of health violations.
And why didn’t Prevatt criticize her after she voted to de-fund Planned Parenthood?
Prevatt keeps giving her free passes – while he attacks fellow Democrats like Mill and Lucas. All they have done is attack her – and she deserves that.
If Prevatt isn’t shilling for Janet to save his own neck, then why exactly is he shiling for her?
As for Hoa, it was alleged he was in league with Van Tran. Fair enough but as Lucas has said, Janet is the new Van Tran.
Finally, I am not anti-labor. In fact I belong to a union. But I do opose unions when they become overly greedy. That is a huge problem in California.
I wanna run against “Loretta Airhead #1″
Battle of the Airheads 2010
OC voters love airheads….
Unions – another case study in itself!
unions sell their members out- and I’m sure everyone has a story or knows of someone’s story.
Members, don’t rely on your union rep 100% they are not always on your side?????
The claims about Prevatt shilling and running interference for Janet to cover his ass at work were made by a commenter, not the OJ.
However if this is why Prevatt became a Janny I can’t blame him, jobs are hard to come by in today’s economy and he doesn’t seem to have a skill set or educational background that is much sought after by those that may be hiring.
The fact that you say this isn’t the reason he is a Janny makes it even more puzzling why he is. She has not exactly been a supporter of issues that someone proclaiming to be a liberal would get behind.
As far as the ridiculousness and baseless nature of the claims made by the commenter, they are no more ridiculous or baseless then Chris’s attempt to paint my as a Van Tran ally or an actual full fledged “Trannie”.
As a Health Care Agency employee one would think that Chris would be concerned about health and safety issues regarding restaurants. For some reason he ignores this when it pertains to the Janny cabal. Can you tell us why?
Sean,
Well said. I am curious though. What exactly would a guy like Prevatt, with no college degree, do in a public health department in the first place? That is baffling…
Sean,
You claim that the accusation that Prevatt is allegedly a shill for Janet was made by a commentor and not the OJ, and then go right on to expand on the accusation with “However if this is why Prevatt became a Janny I can’t blame him, jobs are hard to come by in today’s economy and he doesn’t seem to have a skill set or educational background that is much sought after by those that may be hiring.” You do not have a clue what Prevatt’s background or work experience is. You clearly don’t even understand that the Health Care Agency employs more than 2,000 workers in multiple departments. Environmental Health is not where Prevatt works.
You also do not have a clue how health codes are enforced. The proposed rating system that the board majority voted down changed no health code regulations. The system was modified to make violations and closures more apparent to consumers. You are trying to create an issue where there isn’t one. Nothing voted on by Supervisor Nguyen would have changed the regulations that her husband’s restaurant must comply with.
And you may want to check your history, the board voted 5-0 to terminate Planned Parenthood funding. Prevatt and TheLiberalOC criticized that decision significantly. Since Nguyen was not the driving force behind the decision, she was not singled out for special criticism, and rightly so.
And Art, isn’t it true that you got fired from your last job? Since that is the rumor and you cannot prove otherwise, it must be true.
Since Chris seems to think so highly of Tom and Andy’s sandwich shop why doesn’t he suggest they cater the Young Dems, OCEA or ECCO meetings? He could even become a regular customer on his way home to LONG BEACH. Their shop is right off the 22 Freeway that he travels out of town on.
What is the over/under as to how long before he shows up there threatening a lawsuit? That is his usual modus operandi.
#23,
You wrote, “The system was modified to make violations and closures more apparent to consumers.”
What would be more apparent than a letter grade? That is what every county that surrounds Orange County has in place. I wonder what grade Tom’s restaurant would have? Perhaps a C?
As for the Planned Parenthood vote, my point is that Janet joined the other Republican supervisors in voting to de-fund Planned Parenthood. So tell me, why does Prevatt still shill for her?
Lastly, no, I was not fired. I resigned. What the Hell does that have to do with this post? Unlike Prevatt I am a college grad and I am able to readily find work. I don’t need a union to do that for me. Perhaps he should go back to school and finish a degree.
#24,
Good point! Prevatt should eat there every day.
Art,
#23 is just using the Janny tactic of spin and attack.
Janet’s vote on the letter grading of restaurants and the Planned Parenthood debacle are both good indications as to her character.
Folks like #23 and Prevatt would rather attack us for pointing it out rather than go after Janet.
#23 is correct, the Planned Parenthood vote was 5-0. However Prevatt and company all but Janet? #23 still has no explanation as to why Janet is excluded from criticism.
Perhaps Prevatt’s handler and well known Janny Phil Bacerra told him that he wouldn’t let Prevatt buy him any more drinks at Drinking Liberally if Chris went after Janet.
They also can’t explain why it is so terrible for me, a Democrat, to go after Janet a Republican.
In their minds if you attack fellow Democrats in defense of Janet you are a good Democrat. However if you are a Democrat and attack Janet, you are a disloyal “Trannie” operative.
Go figure. Who are they more loyal to, the Democrats or Janet?
I think their actions tell us the answer to that question.
Revisionsist history is en vogue. Paul first gave money to Janet’s defense fund in an attempt to sway her to give him an appointment. He passed around a petition to get signatures to encourage Janet to appoint him. When he did not get the appointment he suddenly changed his tune.
First he filed for supervisor at the behest of his Trannie handlers. Then when chickened out he still owed his Trannie handlers a favor. Then Paul signed the letter against Janet. As fires raged Paul instantly went into damage control and tried to claim he was just helping Democrats. But Paul only helps himself. Art and Sean your hatred of Janet has blinded you all to the facts. Art you usually call it fair but this war with Prevatt has clouded your judgement. Paul only helps Paul. No coverup will deny the facts.
#28,
So Paul wised up and saw Janet for what she really is. He just joins a long line of former supporters of Janet.
So Paul tried to undermine Janet and he helped further the flame war between Janet and Tran. What is wrong with that? Let the Reeps eat their own.
Please explain what Paul’s sin was in this case. He aided the Trannies to attack another Republican? So what. He wasn’t doing it to attack a fellow Democrat, so it is all good if you ask me.
If we use your logic in which you castigate Lucas for dealing with Reeps like Tran, can’t we castigate Prevatt and company for getting into bed with Jubal and Schroeder in regards to the attack on Art?
If it was wrong for Lucas it should be wrong for Prevatt, right?
Also can you cite one reason why Democrats should provide cover for Janet? He voting record isn’t any better than the Trannies. They are just diferent sides of the same coin.
#28,
Why Paul turned on Janet is immaterial. What does matter is that since she got elected Supervisor she has become the new Van Tran. She votes the same way as the other Republicans on the Board of Supervisors. And she worked overtime to get her Chief of Staff elected to the Garden Grove City Council and her husband appointed to the Garden Grove Planning Commission. She is putting together her own league of Jannies just as Tran did with the Trannies.
Paul flipped on Janet – but she is a Republican, so who cares? Prevatt got in bed with Mike Schroeder and a host of Trannies when they attacked my campaign last year. Isn’t that the same thing that Prevatt is accusing Lucas of doing?
Again, show me ONE THING that Janet has done to deserve the support of area Democrats. She voted against Planned Parenthood, she voted against restaurant health ratings, she voted to spend thousands on lobby remodeling at her office and on new furniture – while county workers were being laid off. That is not the sort of record that should be attractive to most Democrats!
Lucas should be recognized as a hero by his party for being the first one to point out that Janet is the new Van Tran!
Art,
You and I both know that these attacks on Lucas and myself by Prevatt and his fellow Janny’s are being orchestrated by Phil Bacerra.
Phil is an avowed Janny who pushes Prevatt’s buttons and Prevatt jumps.
Phil is the type of individual that operates in the shadows and has others do the dirty work. This gives him plausible deniabilty.
The Democratic Party would be best served by keeping these folks at arms length. Bacerra offers nothing to the party, no money or volonteerism. He just infiltrates and schmoozes and in the end does harm to Democratic interests.
“I gave her the benefit of the doubt.”
That’s one way to put it. The truthful way to put it is Art was a full-fledged shill for Janet!
Janet wasn’t any different before and after she endorsed Bustamante over Art. Art’s change of heart was about that endorsement, and nothing else.
Sean,
Phil Becerra AKA Count Chocula The Unemployed Planner is basically ran out of friends. His only allies are Thomas Gordon, A frequent tourist to cambodia as he related to us at DL several times, and Chris Prevatt a shrill small pointless 50 year old man, and Claudio AKA Fraudio gallegos. So Phil has nothing better to do than lash out at others.
“can’t we castigate Prevatt and company for getting into bed with Jubal and Schroeder in regards to the attack on Art?
Attack? Sean, all that mailer did was re-print things Art said on this blog. If you think that is “attacking” Art, then you must think he is a kook.
#18, AKA Lucasbut AKA Janet Staffer, Its obvious that you are a staffer for janet nguyen or you wouldnt have so much intimate knowledge of chris prevaqtt his job his background and the situation atthe county departments. So why don you spoare us the spin and go decorate your office agin.
If anyone doubts that janet nguyen is balls deep into chris prevatt, one need only look at the recent post he [put up about andy quach’s accident. Are we to believe that chris prevatt was able to secure 911 tapes on his own? Give me a break. he is being spoon fed information by janet nguyen and her staff.
Are you talking about the same Phil Bacerra that always mooches drinks off me at Memphis?
Are you talking about the same Phil Bacerra that told people he was supportive of Michele Martinez until she refused to appoint him to the Planning Commission so he spread lies about her and worked hard to keep her from getting the DPOC and Young Dem endorsement last election?
Are you talking about the same Phil Bacerra that called Fullerton officials trying to stir up trouble for Sal Tinajero?
Are you talking about the same Phil Bacerra that was behind the posting of the photo of a homeless woman holding a sign talking about physically assaulting a Santa Ana City Councilmember?
Are you talking about the same Phil Bacerra that I regularly hear badmouth Councilmembers Claudia Alvarez and Vince Sarmiento when he is at the Memphis?
Are you talking about that Phil Bacerra Sean?
#34,
That mailer was most certainly a hit piece. And I forgot to mention that Janet’s Republican pal Judy Ware was in on it too. What great company for Prevatt to hang out with…
Crusader,
Don’t try and spin away from the point, Prevatt got in bed with Schroeder and company regarding the mailer aimed at Art.
Why is it wrong for Lucas to get involved with Tran to go after Janet, but just fine for Prevatt to get involved with Schroeder and company to go after Art?
Prevatt, Bacerra and the others said Paul was involved with folks that are a major threat to the DPOC and our candidates.
Are you telling me that Tran is a greater threat than Schroeder?
Bottom line here is that what Prevatt and company did was get in bed with an enemy of the DPOC to take out a center/left leaning indpendent candidate. Lucas got in bed with an enemy of the DPOC to take out a right wing Republican.
How is what Lucas did wrong and what Prevatt did just fine?
Enlighten me crusader.
“That mailer was most certainly a hit piece.”
Art, if you think quoting what you have written on your own blog is a “hit piece,” that says more about you than anything else.
Sean:
No one is spinning away from the point except you trying to change the subject. I made a simple point that you, Sean, think quoting Art’s own words is an “attack,” which would only be true if Art’s words reflect negatively on him.
Instead of responding to that simple point, you, in your usual way, try to change the subject to things I never brought up.
How the DPOC allows these twop clowns Phil Becerra AKA Count Chocula the Unemployed Planner, and Chris Prevatt to steer the discourse among Dems is beyond me.
Maybe we should email all DPOC Central Committee members with all these insights into how Janet Nguyen has infiltrated the Democratic party and get that cow melahat fired like she should have been when she put that intern up to filing a false police report.
#40,
The hit piece included my picture amidst a pile of nuts. It took comments out of context with the purpose of attacking my campaign.
For Prevatt to support this when my opponent was the notorious Republican Carlos Bustamante says it all. ECCO and Planned Parenthood had him on their unacceptable lists!
But let’s get back to the point of this article. Prevatt continues to attack Democrats while shilling for Janet Nguyen. Please tell me why he is shilling for her. Please give me even one good reason why she deserves that support from the ostensibly Democratic blog that Prevatt runs.
Janet Nguyen represents a threat to Prevatt’s party. Why is he shilling for her?
Crusader,
do you mind telling us how Chris Prevatt got a hold of the 911 and dispatch tapes if it were it not for janet nguyen and her staff?
Which comments were out of context, Art?
At the time you were saying it was ineffective and helped you. Now it was an attack?
Why does an ostensibly Libertarian blogger like you support liberal Democrats like Lou Correa who have records of growing government and raising taxes? You don’t have much standing to criticize Prevatt.
Crusader,
Yes taking Art’s words out of context and placing them amidst pictures of nuts is an attack I my eyes.
Now answer my question. If it was wrong for Paul Lucas to align himself with Van Tran, was it wrong for Chris Prevatt to align himself with Mike Scroeder?
The subject of this post is Prevatt, so try sticking to that.
Again, what was taken out of context?
Crusader,
You are continuing to evade the point of this post – Prevatt is a shill for Republican Supervisor Janet Nguyen. I am going to ignore your attempts to change the subject.
Again, tell me why Prevatt is shilling for her. And tell me why she deserves Democratic support.
Prevatt runs a blog called the “Liberal OC.” Yet he uses it to promote Republicans and he doesn’t even live here. He lives in Long Beach.
My blog is a multi-partisan blog. So we can support whomever we want to. The fact that I am a Libertarian is immaterial. I live in a city that is overwhelmingly Democratic. We don’t usually have any Libertarians on the ballot. So I support the best candidates I can find, from amongst a very poor lot.
So, why is Prevatt shilling for Janet Nguyen? And why does he keep attacking Democrats like Sean Mill and Paul Lucas whose only “sin” is to dislike Janet Nguyen? They should be applauded for doing so!