What If It Had Been Utah Rather Than Ukraine?


 Powered by Max Banner Ads 

.

.

.

Trump and Romney dine at Mar-a-Lago

Trump and Romney dine at Mar-a-Lago to discuss Romney’s future under Trump. Supposedly, this photo is candid, not posed.

One problem people may have with fully coming to grips with the whole Ukraine Shakedown situation is that it’s foreign.  It deals with people staving off a Russian invasion — something that is no longer part of popular culture since the days of Red Dawn — and customs of a smaller country far away from us.

But that Trump’s actions (I’m being delicate there) occurred overseas is not a critical part of the story, except for the argument that Trump has complete power over foreign policy (which only applies if you think that extorting people to do a baseless investigation for personal political gain is “foreign policy.”)

They happened in Ukraine — but they could as easily have happened in Utah.

What if, in another timeline, Mitt Romney had decided to challenge Donald Trump for the 2020 Republican Presidential nomination?

Is it much of a stretch to imagine that Trump would have tried to use his power to get dirt on Romney in Utah?

One can easily imagine Trump going to Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes and telling him that he was going to do something great for Utah — maybe nice for Reyes himself, who was a finalist for Trump’s appointment to run the FTC — but that he wanted a little favor.

He would want Reyes to announce that he was opening an investigation into charges (which could elsewhere be made up, if need be, or could be plucked from this list compiled by Politifact) into Mitt Romney’s past record running Bain Capital.  This wasn’t a quid pro quo, Trump would explain, because Reyes should want to investigate Romney on his own volition.

If Reyes, perhaps doubting the legitimacy of these charges (or his own jurisdiction over them) balked, Trump could escalate, telling Reyes that he should want the President to be his friend given the possibility of federal charges against him in connection with his involvement (mostly as a recipient of political contributions) from a polygamist sect accused of “defraud[ing] American taxpayers out of $511 million of renewable energy tax credits,” which he had falsely stated that he had sequestered until the end of the federal investigation.

We can imagine that at that point Reyes gave in and agreed that he would announce his own investigation of Romney in January 2020 — but that when a whistleblower from his office got wind of this and cried foul, the plan was abandoned and Trump denied ever asking him to do such an investigation, later saying that he had only said that Reyes should WANT to do it on his own.

Despite evidence of the above facts, in this alternative timeline, Reyes says (not under oath) that he never felt coerced or pressured by Trump to investigate Romney or announce plans to do it, on the grounds that “he’d never do something like that anyway.”

Is all of this OK?  Or is any of it grounds for impeachment?

How about if we switch to Florida — and imagine that Trump was sequestering badly needed hurricane relief from that state unless he could get its government to investigate some spurious charge made up against Jeb Bush — who in yet another different timeline was running against him in their primary.

Would that have been OK?

If not, then why is Trump excused for his actions regarding Ukraine?


About Greg Diamond

Somewhat verbose attorney, semi-retired due to disability, residing in northwest Brea. Occasionally runs for office against bad people who would otherwise go unopposed. Got 45% of the vote against Bob Huff for State Senate in 2012; Josh Newman then won the seat in 2016. In 2014 became the first attorney to challenge OCDA Tony Rackauckas since 2002; Todd Spitzer then won that seat in 2018. Every time he's run against some rotten incumbent, the *next* person to challenge them wins! He's OK with that. Deposed as Northern Vice Chair of DPOC in April 2014 (in violation of Roberts Rules) when his anti-corruption and pro-consumer work in Anaheim infuriated the Building Trades and Teamsters in spring 2014, who then worked with the lawless and power-mad DPOC Chair to eliminate his internal oversight. Expelled from DPOC in October 2018 (in violation of Roberts Rules) for having endorsed Spitzer over Rackauckas -- which needed to be done. None of his pre-putsch writings ever spoke for the Democratic Party at the local, county, state, national, or galactic level, nor do they now. One of his daughters co-owns a business offering campaign treasurer services to Democratic candidates and the odd independent. He is very proud of her. He doesn't directly profit from her work and it doesn't affect his coverage. (He does not always favor her clients, though she might hesitate to take one that he truly hated.) He does advise some local campaigns informally and (so far) without compensation. (If that last bit changes, he will declare the interest.)