[…] post was originally published on this […]
And I’m correspondingly proud and haughty.
Let's hope PYLUSD doesn't back down! Gates and Cherniss have cost taxpayers far too much already.
That's kinda high, isn't it?
Which, as is well known, is 73% of the time.
Crap! I hate it when you’re right.
No Steve, she is still 2.3% behind. People keep forgetting much of that district is in LA county. You have…
I guess you missed Ada beating Pulido, same story!
Update from Beverly Hills The trial-setting conference for the Daniel Lifschitz suit against BHUSD will take place on July 21.…
Tom Mc Clintock Archive
-
New video on CA High Speed rail boondoggle
Posted on December 16, 2010 | 7 CommentsNo one should be surprised to hear that I oppose and have railed against the CA HSR project since voters approved that $9 billion plus Bond Measure in 2008. Since […] -
“Transparency in Federal Government Spending” but not in CA
Posted on June 26, 2008 | 1 CommentAt a luncheon meeting today Patrick Gleason, State Coalitions Manager, Americans for Tax Reform, visited from Washington, DC. At the opening of the meeting he gave us some valuable tools […]
![New video on CA High Speed rail boondoggle No one should be surprised to hear that I oppose and have railed against the CA HSR project since voters approved that $9 billion plus Bond Measure in 2008. Since […]](https://www.orangejuiceblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/HSRV-155x155.jpg)
[…] post was originally published on this […]