.
.
.

“Can she still maintain the story that her reputation’s glory contains nothing slightly gory?” Quoth the Bar Court: “Nevermore.”
Vern and I have taken no end of grief in certain quarters.over our crediting the allegations that have been promoted by 2014 72nd Assembly District general election candidate Joel Block, among others, about the professional misconduct of 2016 72nd Assembly District general election candidate Lenore Albert Sheridan. I’m not going to review them here (although Vern, who got the worst of it, may choose to do so. They are reviewed in the attached 16-page PDF file with the decision of the State Bar Court.
Some attorneys love to read and chatter about the disciplinary measures taken towards other attorneys. I don’t, especially when the target is a fellow solo practitioner. I raise this at all because (1) Albert-Sheridan is a candidate for office and people should be aware of this before they vote in the race, and (2) Albert-Sheridan went after those people who credited these allegations hammer-and-tongs for the past year, especially in the context of her wrongful endorsement by the Democratic Party of Orange County (she didn’t actually have enough votes to go forward for state party consideration) and her barely making it through that process because the deciding nay vote was late. When someone fights that hard and that viciously, throwing low blows that their critics are animus-motivated liars, then it’s fair to want to see the record straight.
I’m sure that people will try to goad me into further comment on this, perhaps successfully, but at least for the two weeks remaining until Election Day I’d prefer to leave it here to speak for itself. It’s not as if the opportunity to vote for Lenore Albert Sheridan is what would be bringing a lot of people to the polls. It’s just too bad that Nam Pham, her culturally homophobic but otherwise progressive Democratic opponent in the primary, isn’t up against Travis Allen instead. OJB will take no position on this race and I’d prefer not to comment beyond this for now.
Well it’s about time. And there is another Bar action in the wings, and hopefully more to follow for Lenore’s failure to properly handle cases. As if threatening to decapitate an attorney in 2007 wasn’t enough… or asking where another attorney’s child went to school to “teach him (the opposing attorney) a lesson”. Those TRO’s were denied most likely because Albert was an attorney – a dangerous double standard that has left this woman 9 more years to continue to harm others.
Lenore Albert has done so many things to harm people she decides are “enemies” (which just means they disagree with her) it’s hard to list them all. But some of the biggest is claiming people who oppose her are “Gang Stalkers” and suing them for defamation — after implying many of those same people are criminals and stating “these people are and/or can be dangerous” in a YouTube video which was sent to Facebook. One of those people was a 12 year old girl…
These people Lenore has wrongly targeted are some of the most diligent foreclosure activists in OC and LA, including past clients, Occupy leaders, and other winning homeowners who managed to win without Lenore’s “help” and told people the truth about that. And, former disgruntled clients who are angry Lenore abandoned them for not defending her on FACEBOOK of all things — breaking client confidentiality — and the timing of which caused more than one to lose their home.
Thus far Lenore Albert has lost her supposed “Defamation” lawsuit against the people she claims are “Gang Stalkers”. Guess who is the stalker? HER. She admitted on the record falsely creating multiple aliases, which she has been caught using to spy on the very people she claims are “stalkers”. Perhaps she should re-read the legal definition of “stalking”.
Thus far Lenore Albert owes Yelp, Ripoff report and other activists almost $100K in legal fees for wrongly suing them.
It is shocking the Democratic party endorsed Lenore Albert. Clearly they don’t do their due diligence.
Perhaps Karma really is starting to happen in politics… Because if this woman is elected she will abuse her power even more, make no mistake.
I used to attend Foreclosure Self Help meetings with Ms. Albert until I realized that she was unworthy of my time. I wanted to help others, but quickly concluded that she was a liar, a thief, and unprepared for the job.] She used to assure her clients and future clients that there is a backroom court where all decisions are made, leaving us all to believe that the system was rigged. What kind of lawyer does that? After I refused to help her (because she knew very little about foreclosure at the time), she decided to sue me for defamation of character. She lost after the judge concluded that I made all true statements:
– She did lose several cases after failing to meet deadlines.
– She was admonished several times by several high courts for being “less than candid” with the court in her filings under penalty of perjury.
– She did FIRE several of her clients in ONE email, a few of them right before their big court hearings.
– She did repeatedly use the same excuse for her failures — her computer must have been hacked. Really? After the first half a dozen times or so, one would think she would have invested in better security.
– She did repeatedly misstate facts in order to win cases. In one case she loves to promote her victory without informing potential clients that her victory was short lived once the Court realized that she LIED. The decision wasn’t overturned because of judicial mistake but due to her behavior.
– She did repeatedly fail to properly do her job.
She responded to my allegations by taking out a restraining order against me, a practice that losing Orange County lawyers abuse when they are losing to a Pro Se Litigant. In one case (because she tried and failed twice), she sent a recently paroled rapist — a man alleged to have knocked his cab fare unconscious before raping her, to my front door to deliver her summons. [The court did not convict him of rape because an unconscious woman can not say no — that was the law of the land at the time.] She was clearly trying to scare me. She also used this rapist to serve other women, usually late at night. She also broke the law and violated her own temporary restraining order. Specifically, after lying to the court to get a temporary restraining order against me, she sent her flunky to stalk my home. This was proven in court. Of course the presiding judge refused to sanction her or put her in jail, something he would have happily done had it been me who violated the court order.
Orange County deserves better than Lenore Albert Sheridan. She even lied to the court and claimed that she never used that name! I thought perjury was a crime, but I guess the laws don’t apply to lawyers. Do you really want to give her more power? I hope not.
I got the worst of it? I barely noticed. I’m so used to getting flack from fuckwits, it flows down my back in a steady stream. I’d probably miss it if it stopped.
What I remember best is the ridiculous Chmielewski going balls out for her, SIMPLY because me and Greg warned about her… http://www.theliberaloc.com/2016/05/10/introducing-lenore-albert-a-democratic-candidate-for-ad-72/
Oh yeah, and then she was gonna really show Greg or something…
http://www.theliberaloc.com/2016/07/08/the-cancer-in-the-dpoc-stage-3-lenore-albert-seeks-diamonds-removal-from-democratic-party/comment-page-1/
What a freak.
I still haven’t gotten notice from the state party about that complaint. (I’m beginning to think that it was all a fraud.)
Thanks for reminding me of that first Chumley article. Someone should go there and ask him for comment on the decision! I’m sure that he’ll be contrite….
So many folks with grievances against Lenore showed up on that one that he closed the comments.
You people are just cyber bullying me! I am a crusader for truth and justice! This has been going on far too long! First you conspired with sovereign citizens like the State Bar of California and the Ford Dealer and the Courts and the local bus service and the people who used to work in my office and my former clients and the news media and the State Bar Court, but this is just too much! I am going to pitch a hissy all over social media any minute now!
okay — I’ll quote the key passage:
“The Court finds the Respondent (Lenore Albert Sheridan) is culpable”
That would be a “Guilty as charged.”
Our 140,000th comment, by the way (despite that some do blink in and out of existence, as Vern usually notes.) Still — it’s a milestone and you made it count!
By the way, which one of the three times that that appears in the decision are you quoting?
One word woman…. #Crook
Little Lenore Luanne finally hit the big time. She made the OC Register and Scott Lay’s Nooner Report the same day. Enjoy your 15 minutes Al Lenore (aka) Lenore Albert (aka) Lenore Sheridan (aka) Citizen Acktivist!!! http://www.ocregister.com/articles/albert-733571-sheridan-court.html
Seriously, it took too long. Our battle could have been abated on appeal, but because of her incompetence we have been at it another two years.
The negligence in deserting a client two weeks before the Appeal brief is due, is too abusive to even understand unless you’ve been there. You do not want this type of individual responsible for the lives and livelihood of the public!
We were left alone with no attorney, and our home on the line, later she falsely accuses us, just like the lenders! Lenore Albert, you ought to be ashamed of yourself!!
Let’s not forget this one where she threatens to decapitate heads and give them to the kids for show and tell
https://www.dropbox.com/s/idqycibdm8vdb8t/Albert%20decapitated%20letter%20and%20transcript%202-22-10.pdf?dl=0
Don.t forget this one! From when Albert sued the State Bar, for a second time.
http://www.docfoc.com/state-bar-reply-to-lenore-albert-sheridan-s-opposition-to-demurrer
Lenore Albert-Sheridan now has two more State Bar disciplinary complaints filed against her, since the Decision (which she has appealed) in October. That makes five, count ’em, FIVE pending cases with the State Bar discipline court!
I’m a little bit reluctant to have this published here without checking it out myself. But for all I know it’s true. If anyone knows Lenore and wants to see if she disputes this assertion of 3 existing + 2 new = 5 total, please let me know. I know of one additional one, but haven’t written about it.
The Decision which is on appeal was of 3 different cases combined into one proceeding. The others are new filings. 3+2 = 5, at least in the old math. Here is a link to Albert’s State Bar profile which shows the two new filings at the bottom – click on the “pdf” link to see them..http://members.calbar.ca.gov/fal/Member/Detail/210876
Thanks for the info. But you have to admit, Ronald McDonald is a pretty bad clown. Probably one of those violent ones.
Hardly. Ronald McDonald is a highly experienced clown. Over 10 billion have been served! But he admittedly has terrible taste in hair color and he serves fake ribs. So there is that.