Government Shutdown Provides Inadvertent Lesson in Downside of Contracting

Government Employees Protest Shutdown

Yay — government employees will be getting back pay for the time they spent furloughed!  (Of course, people doing the same or similar government work that was outsourced to government *contractors* probably aren’t.)

If you feel happy that government workers, barred from work through no fault of their own, are getting back pay — well, prepare to feel a little less happy.  Much government work is now done by contractors — and at the discretion of their private industry bosses, those working for contractors are probably going to be left holding the empty bag.

Federal workers may be eager for that next paycheck, and they have more reason to be than government contractors that won’t be reimbursed for their days off.

“I’ve had people resign because of the vulnerability of the government,” Ewen said.

CEO Shiv Krishnan, who also went without pay, doesn’t blame the handful of employees who couldn’t take the uncertainty anymore.

And while federal employees are expecting their back pay at the end of this month, that’s when government contractors will get their reduced paychecks.

So let’s tally things up: government workers get treated right — and they stick around.  (So does the expertise and institutional memory that they possess.)  Employees of government contractors get screwed — thanks again, Ted Cruz and Ed Royce! — and they leave, taking that expertise and institutional memory with them.  And the quality of government services — at least those not provided by actual government employees — inevitably goes down.

The lesson of the stupidity of government shutdowns has been well aired.  This less obvious lesson of the week, of the downside of outsourcing of government jobs in a time of nutty extremism, is worth noting as well.

About Greg Diamond

Somewhat verbose attorney, semi-disabled and semi-retired, residing in northwest Brea. Occasionally ran for office against jerks who otherwise would have gonr unopposed. Got 45% of the vote against Bob Huff for State Senate in 2012; Josh Newman then won the seat in 2016. In 2014 became the first attorney to challenge OCDA Tony Rackauckas since 2002; Todd Spitzer then won that seat in 2018. Every time he's run against some rotten incumbent, the *next* person to challenge them wins! He's OK with that. Corrupt party hacks hate him. He's OK with that too. He does advise some local campaigns informally and (so far) without compensation. (If that last bit changes, he will declare the interest.) His daughter is a professional campaign treasurer. He doesn't usually know whom she and her firm represent. Whether they do so never influences his endorsements or coverage. (He does have his own strong opinions.) But when he does check campaign finance forms, he is often happily surprised to learn that good candidates he respects often DO hire her firm. (Maybe bad ones are scared off by his relationship with her, but they needn't be.)