Our “Good Government Republican” writer and commenter Cynthia Ward had a lovely comment here today that I think belongs in a story, so I’m going to import it below. Sadly perhaps for her, or maybe not, I’m going to use it, in part, as an explanation of why I despise Rep. Darrell Issa, who this year climbed into our blogging jurisdiction arena as representative for southernmost OC.
Cynthia’s cri de couer against the Ronald Reagan’s Eleventh Commandment not to criticize other Republicans as opening the door to corruption reflects her partisan version of my own story from 2-1/2 weeks ago about the then-emerging FBI investigations regarding Sen. Ron Calderon. I wanted him and every other Democratic official and semi-official to know that, if push came to shove in an ethical matter that I didn’t have good reason to think was bogus, I would not “have their back.” I would call for due process to take its course. I see part of the service that I can do as a member of a political party is to make it harder for the people who are real bastards to take power. Cynthia, as I read her, feels the same about her own party.
But there’s an important corollary to being willing not to defend one’s own party when it’s wrong, which I also did in a policy matter yesterday. (Happily, my party has apparently listened.) That flip side of integrity in defense of one’s own party is this: have integrity when it comes to attacks on the other party. Don’t make things up; don’t “cry wolf”; don’t throw things at the wall to see what sticks.
I want the Republican Party (and third parties) to be able to present fair and cogent critiques of my party. We’re not gods, we have the capacity to make errors, and in a competitive political system we should be wary of the prospect that the other party will notice them and point them out. Similarly, the Republican Party should want the likes of me — and of the Grand Jury, by the way, County Supervisors — to be able to keep a close and suspicious eye on them, so that they will govern more honestly.
And that is why Darrell Issa — whose positions have often been ably represented here in the past by people such as Geoff Willis and Our Man Skallywag — drives me up a tree. He lies, he conceals, and he discredits. He makes it easy for the worst elements of my party to think that any attack on us can be brushed away as lacking credibility. And that’s why he has to go — seriously, Republicans, he has got to be relieved of his position — as the subpoena-power engorged head of the House Oversight Committee: he sucks.

If I were REALLY being partisan, I’d tell you to make Issa Speaker of the House — but I’m too patriotic to do that.
Issa completely, definitively, outrageously, almost unimaginably sucks at his job, in a way that discredits even potentially legitimate criticism from the Republican Party. Some Democrats may be reading this in horror, because they know that keeping his mendacious and discrediting ass in the center chair actually helps our party. But as part of the same bipartisan faction, even if in the opposite party, as Cynthia, I have to tell you in all honesty: find someone honest who will do better in this job.
You tried it his way. It hasn’t worked. He’s dulling the public to the idea of scandal by being a transparently partisan liar. (By the way, we do thank him for making Sandra Fluke a rising star — she’s a delightful and articulate feminist spokesperson. But even that’s not worth putting up with his boneheadedness.) The “Fast and Furious” scandal went exactly nowhere. The Benghazi “scandal” — ooh, Susan Rice got insufficiently well-developed talking points! — has served primarily to make rational and institutional moderates viscerally afraid of the Republican Party being in power. And the IRS “scandal” — which has been sucking up way too much attention from well-meaning Republican partisans who want it to be significant and true — is circling the drain because … any guesses? … Issa has been lying.
Worse, he’s been covering it up — and he’s so bad at it that no amount of money will ever buy him even a taste of actual executive power. All it took to knock him silly was for a member of the Democratic Party to take the extraordinarily nasty step of … releasing raw witness-interview transcripts that showed Issa’s story to be politically motivated crap.
Rep. Elijah Cummings–ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee–made good on his promise to release more transcripts from the committee’s interviews with workers at the Cincinnati IRS. Despite protests from chairman Darrell Issa, Cummings made available Tuesday the full interview of the IRS Screening Group Manager, who handled groups applying for tax-exempt status.
“This interview transcript…debunks conspiracy theories about how the IRS first started reviewing these cases,” Cummings wrote in a letter to Issa. “Answering questions from Committee staff for more than five hours, this official—who identified himself as a ‘conservative Republican’—denied that he or anyone on his team was directed by the White House to take these actions or that they were politically motivated.”
The “conspiracy theories” Cummings mentions were disseminated by Issa himself. On May 14th, Issa said unequivocally, “This was the targeting of the president’s political enemies effectively and lies about it during the election year, so that it wasn’t discovered until afterwards.” But he had no evidence to support this claim.
When challenged by generally sympathetic reporter Candy Crowly, Issa had promised to release the full transcripts rather than just suggestive excerpts of them. He then reneged. So Cummings, the ranking Democrat on the committee, said, essentially “OK, buster, if you won’t then I will.”
Issa, calling the promise to release the transcripts “reckless,” attacked Cummings directly: “Your decision to make that declaration in a very public way was irresponsible and emblematic of your general aversion to conducting meaningful oversight of the administration.”
And now upon inspection we find out that those transcripts (PDF warning), which Issa had known about from the start, show that most of what Issa was flinging at the wall was … let’s call it “effluence.” All that stuff you heard about before? It was a made-up, political case that depended on your not knowing the full story. That contempt for the public, for good-government folks of both parties, discredits honest criticism. I have defended OC Republicans from Brother Vern this week as “not being stupid,” but let’s be frank: Issa is from San Diego county! I wasn’t talking about him.
Congress needs good, strong, government oversight committees. I’m not naive; I know that they will in part be political, designed in part to highlight and promote certain sides of certain issues. Let us leave such conflicts — like the (to my taste) politically stupid move of excluding Sandra Fluke from testifying as part of what without her turned out to be an all-male panel on the subject of political coverage of birth control, causing Rush Limbaugh to frantically roll his entire career into a paper cigar and light it on fire — to the political arena. (We’ll be fine fighting them out there.) But what I will not stand for — and what you moderates and independents and especially Republicans should not stand for — is for those investigations to be fundamentally dishonest. And that’s what we’ve gotten from Chairman Issa: crippling dishonesty.
This is a good place to, at long last, insert Cynthia’s brave and excellent comment:
I actually despise the 11th Commandment. It is the equivalent of protecting the funny uncle, it is disgraceful, and frankly it is what has the GOP is such a bad place today. When we refuse to speak ill of other Republicans, we fail to clean house. We fail to “protect the brand” if you will. As Republicans, we should be the FIRST to speak out against others of the party who give the GOP a bad name, because it sullies all conservatives.
Look at Anaheim. The face of Republican leadership for a decade now has been the “Masters of the Universe” funneling money into the pork troughs of their buddies, and leaving residential neighborhoods in disrepair and neglect. Now that the aftermath of Pringle’s failed policies are coming to light, we have a Republican majority doing all they can to stubbornly cling to his outdated patterns of governance. It is so bad, that the ONE true Conservative on that dais is being beaten up by the others, to make him go away or shut up.
Because the GOP (and I count myself in this criticism even though I am far from a Republican insider) has failed to grab these morons by the scruff of the neck and make it clear that their increasing greed and arrogance is entirely out of control, voters will clean house come November. The combination of District elections giving voters a genuine choice for the first time since Anaheim grew to the point of making at large elections no longer viable (decades), and the distaste for the current Republican offerings, might very well lead to losing some seats to liberals, and I am FURIOUS about that.
My Republican brethren will claim it is the fault of the ACLU and Los Amigos, and in the name of hanging on to those seats claim that we must block District elections for the greater good. The irony is that none of them bother seeing that the answer is to become the kind of leaders that voters do not WANT to exchange for someone else. Is that not obvious? Like abusive husbands whose wives are threatening to leave after someone finally pays attention to them, they stand between the woman and the front door, menacingly growling that nobody is leaving until they say they can leave….once upon a time that woman loved you enough to marry you, once upon a time someone picked you out of the crowd and chose you above all others, and somewhere the vision has been lost for keeping that relationship healthy.
Its time for the GOP to remove the stained wife-beater tank, shower, shave, and go buy some flowers.
I hope Irvine can learn from Anaheim, a treatise on what NOT to do with fellow electeds when differences arise, or that majority may slip there as it is almost certain to do in Anaheim.
As Republicans who refuse to stand up against the bullies that represent an increasing majority of Central Committee, (or those who own the Central Committee) it is our own damn fault that we are about to be thrown over for a bunch of liberals, Fix it, Now.
Yeah, what she said. Fix it, now. Start by prying Darrell Issa out of that committee chair and installing someone whom I and the public, whatever our political disagreements, can trust and respect. He is sullying respectable, “green-eyeshade,” conservatism.
The government given you a nice (albeit highly bipartisan) juicy NSA domestic surveillance scandal to work with. Do your job of keeping us honest. — “us” meaning both parties. On this one, we need each other’s help to do real, serious government oversight. Issa, at he has repeatedly proven, is not the man for the job.
“politically motivated crap” Hmmm.
When do we get to talk about what really happened at Sandy Hook again?
Hmmmmmm?
Is this the weekend open thread?
Is that the moon, or a streetlight?
Speaking of the moon. If you are looking for something interesting to do this weekend, head east to one of our local deserts. the Moonscape is going to be Awsome! .
Get out of Suburban OC and check it out.
The only problem with a full moon in the desert is fewer visible stars – although walking through the desert in a full moon is fantastic!
No. You’ll be able to tell that a story is the weekly Weekend Open Thread by a series of coded marks at the beginning of its headline that spell out the words “Weekend,” then “Open, then “Thread.”
Will Syrian “rebels” swear they’re not going to eat someone’s organs?
http://english.ruvr.ru/2013_06_21/Will-Syrian-rebels-swear-they-re-not-going-to-eat-someone-s-organs-Rozoff-3043/
It’s true that Syria considers Lebanon to be rightfully part of its territory, and it’s true that Darrell Issa is both Lebanese and rebellious, but I think that any insinuation tying him *directly* to cannibalism would be both unfair and misplaced. Let’s avoid that, shall we?
I could see Issa eating Holders liver.
Yes, and I could see you sprout wings and fly — if you did.
This is a step forward over your claiming that you did see it, at least. I’m happy for that.
*Darrell Issa….used to be this very great Congressman that was helpful, kind, considerate and always a gentleman. He had pulled himself up from the bootstraps, become both an enlisted and officer in the US Army. He was from a strong Lebonese family that knew business. Issa got into little troubles here and there along the way, through the process of becoming one of the Congress’s most richest.
Everything was going along OK……but when our dear friend Chris Cox went to the SEC to run interference for a variety of issues, Issa was thrust into the limelight. Soon, he was making the rounds of all the major Conservative Conferences, he had stints on Fox News and even Bill Mahr…..several times. His mind was right…..but he made no effort to be mean spirited or generally upsetting. He answered our e-mails, his staff was very forthcoming and then…….well, about three years ago….his chief of staff got into trouble. Our guess is that it was a “Hit Job”….undeserved. We never have heard the details of his supposed wrong doing. Anyway, shortly after that – things changed. His personality became that of a “Pit Bull on steroids”. His mean spirited comments and irrational arguments regarding Obama’s so called “Outrageous Behavior” aimed at the “Ants while the Elephants were getting away!” This was a major paradigm shift of a great magnitude that actually followed the Karl Rove, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Extreme Tea Party wave that was just trying to upset the “Apple Cart” at every turn…..when it only had three apples. “Fast and Furious, Benghazi and of course the latest IRS” flubb-a-dub! (Which has been going on for over 60 years!)
This ranks as petty party politics on the surface. Below that surface could be something more meaningful. Why had the House Government Oversight Committee which Darrell serves as Chairman – not gone after the bigger issues? Rhetorical you say? No, something we should be thinking on. President Obama has been incredibly busy moving and shaking the tree of Global Inter-connectedness. Back in the 90’s we called it “Inter-Dependent”. Countries, which maintained their souvereign powers and would work together for mutual benefit. Today – those days are entirely over. We are so Inter-Connected that if “Little Kim” in North Korea farts……the rumble is heard in South Africa.
Darrell Issa…..we knew him when our country could do something on its own. Those days….we have a feeling…..aren’t happening in the future. Is Darrell Issa just being a bad actor or is he just pretending to be a Saturday Cartoon…who does talk shows on Sunday?
So, the question is: Darrell Issa Republican Assigned Hit Man……or is he the pawn for the Loyal Opposition and friend of the Administration? We are still hopeful that Darrell will eventually make his comeback to the days when he was a great rational Congressman serving his constituents well and quietyly bringing the bacon back home to his district.
dang … a very “un-Winship” Winship post – I understood it.
@ Greg Diamond:
I concur with your post – about both parties holding their own members accountable; and of ensuring that legitimate concerns are investigated, while being vigilant about disruptive distractions caused by unfounded partisan allegations.
paco
paco – are you related to art lomeli? You guys sound a lot alike.
Diamond – The word “Falsely” in your headline is extraneous and superfluous.
One can “cry wolf” where there is actually a wolf there, in which event it’s not false.
In fact, I expected you to be the one to point that out if I omitted the word “falsely.”
The government watchdog that exposed IRS targeting of conservative groups gave a blunt response to Democrats’ claims that the agency also targeted liberals: It never happened.
“We found no indication in any of these other materials that ‘Progressives’ was a term used to refer cases for scrutiny for political campaign intervention,” IRS Inspector General J. Russell George wrote in a letter to Democrats.
Democrats have since turned on the IG’s office, claiming it is only telling half the story.
But Republicans used the letter, and a House hearing on Thursday, to counter that narrative — getting the current IRS chief to confirm that, in fact, there’s no evidence to date that progressives were targeted.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/27/watchdog-knocks-down-dem-claim-that-liberal-groups-were-targeted-by-irs/#ixzz2XRfnWvWh
That’s because, as it turns out, Mr. George was ordered by Congressional Republicans to only discuss the targeting of conservative groups.
“The Treasury inspector general (IG) whose report helped drive the IRS targeting controversy says it limited its examination to conservative groups because of a request from House Republicans.
A spokesman for Russell George, Treasury’s inspector general for tax administration, said they were asked by House Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) “to narrowly focus on Tea Party organizations.”
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/06/27/19171531-in-the-wake-of-a-discredited-scandal?lite