A Nation Divided

.

.

.

That’s the finding of a poll, as reported in the Washington Post on May 5. “Across the political spectrum, from right to left and among the unaligned, Americans have become more doctrinaire and ideological in their political views, according to a major new study by the Pew Research Center.”

Put simply, moderate views are shrinking and extreme views are growing on both ends of the spectrum. Perhaps those who regularly read the OJ blog have figured this out already, but for those of us who had not stopped to think about the extreme views seen here and elsewhere, this article drove home the point that we do seem divided on most everything. Whether it is politics or politicians, unions or no unions, immigration or no immigration, Obama yes or Obama no, public sector pensions, the state budget, taxes, or whatever the issue opinions run hot and heavy except down the middle.

The media noted an exception when it seemed the nation came together with a USA attitude surge when 9-11 happened, and again with the recent death of the world’s leading terrorist. But, those exceptions seem few and far between. Even when natural disaster strikes, such as the current Mississippi River flooding, we seem polarized into two camps – those who want to see the flood victims helped, and those who say that these people are not too bright for living in areas known to flood on occasion and they just have to pay the price for their decisions.

Within the two major parties there is also polarization, notes the article. This helps explain why the parties often cannot come together in a unified voice on major public policy issues, and in turn why our Congress is – shall we say – often less than decisive when it come to actually doing something.

Can a nation divided continue in its role as a world leader, the most powerful military force, and a “can do” nation? Looks like we are going to find out.


About Over But Not Out

A retired Orange County employee, and moderate Republican. The editor seriously does not know OBNO's identity as did not the former editor, but his point of view is obviously interesting and valued.