The Public Policy Institute of CA, PPIC, has just released a report entitled “Broadband for All?” that includes some valid questions. This report is Volume 3, Number 2–July 2007.
The sub title reads “Gaps in California’s Broadband Adoption and Availability.”
“Why should overcoming a broadband digital divide, or raising the level of broadband adoption, be a policy goal? No one argues that government should boost ownership of other technologies such as DVD players and digital cameras. The difference is that broadband access (and Internet access generally) is believed to give social or economic benefits that are in the public interest. But does making broadband more available to residents improve health outcomes, lower unemployment, or improve job quality? Does making broadband more available encourage job growth, increase profits, or raise productivity? Does making broadband more available to public workers lower crime rates or improve emergency response?”
In my opinion these are all very valid questions and should be part of any decision be it at the city or county level before engaging any supplier with exclusive contracts to provide said service. That’s my thoughts. What are yours?
Broadband is a birthright…Wi-Fi
is a birthright….much stronger
than Universal Healthcare. As you
might remember..back in the bad
old days…of buffering forever to
view a video on the net or to load
a complicated web site…..these
were the days of “dial-up”..limited
to 56K upload and downloads. And
even more limited when competing
for those precious K’s with guys
that had 128K of ram compared to
your 64K. OK..every new gadget
including the I-Phone requires
Wi-Fi…broadband connections.
It is our birthright…and without
it….you could never listen to
your Frankie Valle records!
Holy Smokes Larry—
If they have their way they will be using the power lines for the carrying of the signals. This will kill the Ham Radio Community and also give those Southern California Edison Bandits more reason to rip your pocket book out with impunity. Better think twice about this one.
Zarkov