[…] post was originally published on this […]
And I’m correspondingly proud and haughty.
Let's hope PYLUSD doesn't back down! Gates and Cherniss have cost taxpayers far too much already.
That's kinda high, isn't it?
Which, as is well known, is 73% of the time.
Crap! I hate it when you’re right.
No Steve, she is still 2.3% behind. People keep forgetting much of that district is in LA county. You have…
I guess you missed Ada beating Pulido, same story!
Update from Beverly Hills The trial-setting conference for the Daniel Lifschitz suit against BHUSD will take place on July 21.…
MV Community Foundation Archive
-
![While many Mission Viejo residents and Juice readers cannot understand terms such as “monetization” of cell tower leases or “net present value” of same they can surely understand wasteful spending […]](https://www.orangejuiceblog.com/wp-content/themes/arras/images/thumbnail.png "Mission Viejo’s “incidental” Rose Parade float costs increase cost 20%+")
Mission Viejo’s “incidental” Rose Parade float costs increase cost 20%+
Posted on October 19, 2008 | 3 CommentsWhile many Mission Viejo residents and Juice readers cannot understand terms such as “monetization” of cell tower leases or “net present value” of same they can surely understand wasteful spending […]
[…] post was originally published on this […]