[…] post was originally published on this […]
And I’m correspondingly proud and haughty.
Let's hope PYLUSD doesn't back down! Gates and Cherniss have cost taxpayers far too much already.
That's kinda high, isn't it?
Which, as is well known, is 73% of the time.
Crap! I hate it when you’re right.
No Steve, she is still 2.3% behind. People keep forgetting much of that district is in LA county. You have…
I guess you missed Ada beating Pulido, same story!
Update from Beverly Hills The trial-setting conference for the Daniel Lifschitz suit against BHUSD will take place on July 21.…
Merced Archive
-
![As HSRA Chairman Curt Pringle and his HSRA Board vote to pursue Florida’s rejected high-speed rail funding I must remind readers that Prop 1A, as detailed in the […]](https://www.orangejuiceblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/HSR1.bmp "CA HSRA plan violates Prop 1A Phase I corridor")
CA HSRA plan violates Prop 1A Phase I corridor
Posted on March 31, 2011 | 6 CommentsAs HSRA Chairman Curt Pringle and his HSRA Board vote to pursue Florida’s rejected high-speed rail funding I must remind readers that Prop 1A, as detailed in the […] -
![Last summer, when promoting “Proposition 1A, the Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century” as a $40 billion, 800 mile high speed train system from Southern California […]](https://www.orangejuiceblog.com/wp-content/themes/arras/images/thumbnail.png "We must challenge CHSRA’s high-speed train funding & operating costs")
We must challenge CHSRA’s high-speed train funding & operating costs
Posted on October 11, 2009 | 7 CommentsLast summer, when promoting “Proposition 1A, the Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century” as a $40 billion, 800 mile high speed train system from Southern California […]
[…] post was originally published on this […]