[…] post was originally published on this […]
And I’m correspondingly proud and haughty.
Let's hope PYLUSD doesn't back down! Gates and Cherniss have cost taxpayers far too much already.
That's kinda high, isn't it?
Which, as is well known, is 73% of the time.
Crap! I hate it when you’re right.
No Steve, she is still 2.3% behind. People keep forgetting much of that district is in LA county. You have…
I guess you missed Ada beating Pulido, same story!
Update from Beverly Hills The trial-setting conference for the Daniel Lifschitz suit against BHUSD will take place on July 21.…
GHG Archive
-
High speed rail. No GHG reduction if powered without renewable energy
Posted on February 7, 2011 | 5 Comments. . . While I will edit their report let me quote from page 29. “High-speed rail proponents have recently acknowledged the need to augment any new train infrastructure with investments in […] -
Achieving CA Greenhouse Gas Emission Targets AB 32
Posted on October 2, 2009 | 1 CommentThe University of California Berkeley has just released a 117 page report for the California Air Resources Board and the California DOT entitled “Achieving California’s Land Use and Transportation Greenhouse Gas […]
![High speed rail. No GHG reduction if powered without renewable energy . . . While I will edit their report let me quote from page 29. “High-speed rail proponents have recently acknowledged the need to augment any new train infrastructure with investments in […]](https://www.orangejuiceblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/HSRV-155x155.jpg)
[…] post was originally published on this […]