See there ya go being malicious!
Geez! Affordable CPRA requests are an important tool needed to expose bad behavior.
[…] post was originally published on this […]
[…] post was originally published on this […]
And I’m correspondingly proud and haughty.
Let's hope PYLUSD doesn't back down! Gates and Cherniss have cost taxpayers far too much already.
That's kinda high, isn't it?
Which, as is well known, is 73% of the time.
Crap! I hate it when you’re right.
California Progress Report Archive
-
How will US Supreme Court rule in Dukes v. Wal-Mart?
Posted on March 24, 2011 | 7 Comments. . . . . While we are glued to our TV’s awaiting the outcome of the state budget there is a major employer who is facing a sex discrimination/class […] -
Would SCA-24, revising term limits, be the solution?
Posted on July 25, 2009 | No CommentsThis past week I had breakfast with an elected south county official where we covered several policy issues including the impacts of “term limits.” In June of 1998 we debated […] -
Without a bailout 150,000 CA homes could be foreclosed in the next 12 months
Posted on July 3, 2008 | 13 CommentsAs we have stated in the private property rights debates, home ownership is the cornerstone of the American dream. Ten years ago I listened as Ronzel Cato lost his Fresno […]
![How will US Supreme Court rule in Dukes v. Wal-Mart? . . . . . While we are glued to our TV’s awaiting the outcome of the state budget there is a major employer who is facing a sex discrimination/class […]](https://www.orangejuiceblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/walmart-155x155.jpg)
![Would SCA-24, revising term limits, be the solution? This past week I had breakfast with an elected south county official where we covered several policy issues including the impacts of “term limits.” In June of 1998 we debated […]](https://www.orangejuiceblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/no-term-limits.jpg)
I don't see why anybody should be shocked by Democrats doing this. They are the party of pro-government bias and…