My wife and I had an interesting experience the other night. We were in our dining room and she he was showing me a new phone charger she had found for cheap — which she intended be used on my side of the bed, since I had lost my charger cord while traveling. I said that I wasn’t sure that it was long enough, and she said that it was the same length as the one on her side of the bed, which I’ve occasionally been using. I asked again: “Are you sure it’s long enough?”
“Yeah.”
The response did not come from my wife. It came from our living room, essentially the same room in our open-plan home. It was an adult woman’s voice, somewhat high, but not extremely so. It was unaccented, casual, familiar, unaffected — not “girlie,” not plaintive, just normal. “Yeah.” Clear, like she was standing at most a few yards away.
Our heads both whipped around and stared towards towards the living room. We didn’t see anyone there; we didn’t hear the shuffle or scuttle of anyone moving. I rushed in forward to see if anyone was in the bathroom off of the living room, which connects to the backyard. The door was open, light off. Checked it; checked the shower stall. No one.
We have a Google speaker in our living room near the TV, but its voice is more of an alto. No radio or phone. The TV was off.
We have also been clearing property out of my father’s house, after his wife died a few years ago and he has moved into a nice senior facility. (Hence my absence from this blog.) If it was an apparition, it wasn’t her: she too was an alto.
So: probably not a home invasion. Probably not a haunting or a slip in the space-time continuum or a parallel universe, but only because I do not believe in such things. Not a hallucination: we don’t use drugs and we had independently heard the voice and reacted without coordinating with the other. Not some blurt from the TV; it was off. There was only one device running in the room that could have made such a sound.

“Hey Google,” my wife said. “Did you say anything?” I forget the speaker’s exact words, but the gist was “no.”
“Have you been listening to us?”, my wife asked.
“I routinely listen for your commands, which have to be preceded by ‘Hey Google!’ …” or some such thing.
After a little more back-and-forth, Google volunteered: “Do you want me to delete your conversations from today?”
What?!
“YES!”, we said in tandem.
Google said that we would have to go into Settings and “Voice Recognition,” because she didn’t recognize my wife’s voice. We couldn’t figure out what we were being told to do, so —
“Hey Google, OFF!”
A moment passed.
“We should unplug it,” my wife said.
I agreed. But we haven’t.
I thought of two movies in the aftermath of this event.
One was the Francis Ford Coppola/Gene Hackman classic, The Conversation, a Best Picture nominee at the 1975 Oscars., which deals with the means and effects of electronic eavesdropping. (That description is woefully inadequate; you should seek out and watch the movie if you haven’t. Actually, even if you have.)
The other was German (based on life in East Germany, when there was such a thing) called The Lives of Others, which won the Best Foreign Film Oscar in 2006, about the paranoia of living the society dominated by East German Communist Party’s Secret Police, the Stasi, and the privilege of those who misuse their power.
Our best hypothesis as to the source of that voice — because all of the others seem so bad — was that at least two people were indeed listening to us and, with an errant elbow or God-knows-what, toggled from receiving to transmitting at the moment where the woman responded to a question with a “Yeah.” This has never happened to us before; it has not happened again since.
We hear a lot about surveillance of cell phones — I forget the name of Anaheim’s alleged system for such — and surveillance through our phones and computers. I’ve long figured that, if I were a good enough leftist activist, I would probably be targeted for it at some point — but I’ve also thought that perhaps I am not quite good enough for that. This unexplained event was a rare, quick — one word — glimpse into the possibility that it is true. I don’t know what to do about it; if they have that sort of access to us, they can probably easily find another if we did unplug the smart speaker. We have already let our guard down. We have not legally permitted such access to our lives — that we know of — but all we can think of doing is to keep on living them as if it is not happening.
If anyone who has to do with surveillance is reading this, let it be known: beyond the limited functionality of passively waiting for our commands, we do not consent to monitoring and capturing of our communications. That’s just for the record, for whatever recourse we may someday discover that we have for harms as yet unimagined.
This is your Weekend Open Thread. (The way things have been going, though, it may last a month.) Talk about our haunting or anything else you’d like, within reasonable bounds of discretion and decorum.
Did I forget to include “decency” in that list? Yeah.
*New Tech? Hey, we have had Alexa for about four years now. Got her when Amazon first came out with the Tower….which has incredible sound. Can’t live without our Alexa! If you pay the $3 bucks a month, you get any song you have ever heard or not heard. We love our music…..however, Alexa still won’t play certain revolutionary songs like “Go Rosa Go”
by Sandy Rogers……and sometimes she gets in tiffy mood and you have to ask three or four times in different ways. Like: Alexa, play Summertime Blues by Eddie Cocoran. Or
Alexa play Eddie Cocoran. The cool thing is that Alexa plays complete Albums like: Alexa play the White Album by the Beatles!
The New Tech however is getting expensive: Now you need Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime and Paramount Plus for starters. Starts to get expensive Anyway, times they are a changin……and we really loved Longmire and now 1883 and all the Blacklists and..and ..and
In other news: Mancheese Sleaze and Cinema the Enema know how to mess up a good Birthday Cake. So, the mid-term elections are going to be very interesting. If all those folks in the 80 IQ States have their way….Adolph II will be soon coming back in 2024. Ah, America…..ain’t it great yet?
Finally, what a joy to see the Bengal’s and Joe Burrow beat the dreaded Titans, and
the 49’ers beat the NON-VAX Rodgers dude! Aaron can now join Djokovic are the best in persona non grata on TV. Now, if we can only beat KC today….it will be great to see new sports heroes doing the commercials we have all grown to know and love.
I’m glad you’re glad!
But — my concern is that there seems to have been — though I can’t prove that there wa — an actual person monitoring us in real time through our Google Speaker, rather than just a program waiting to be activated by certain keywords. If this doesn’t bother you, I’m not sure why.
*OK, we didn’t mention the Lambs and their game against the Bucs today! Never liked Matt Stafford, never like the Manning Brothers, never liked a bunch of over-rated QB’s based on their incredible lack of character. But that is just our opinion of course. Wasn’t much taken by Joe Montana either, maybe it all started with Fran Tarkington back in the 1970’s. Anyway, we will be pulling for the great Tom Brady today!
You’re rooting against the Rams? That’s a bold declaration here in Greater LA!
*We are going with the Cincy and the 49’ers in the Super Bowl.
Absolutely detest both the Lambs and Leafs! Their QB’s are both
totally unlikable to this Cowboy/Seahawk! The Bills and the Bucs were our
picks…..but suddenly the Bill’s defense became Terracota Warriors
in this game on every play. The same goes for the Bucs too, who could
not sack a bag of groceries much less the Stonehenge Stafford.
OK, as threatened, I’d like for us to have a discussion on this article from Voice of OC, https://voiceofoc.org/2022/01/fullerton-begins-looking-at-bonds-to-pay-pension-debt/, which talks about Fullerton considering issuing municipals bonds to pay its future pension debt.
Interest rates are still low for now — so is this a good idea? Should Anaheim and other cities be doing the same, making investors wanting to avoid taxes happy? Or is it too easy — allowing cities to evade the consequences of their past actions and improperly shifting the burden for previous decisions from current residents to future ones?
The pension obligation bond scheme is just an end-run around going to the voters for a bond. How this was even agendized remains a mystery, apparently. Laying on new property taxes to free up revenue will, as has been pointed out elsewhere, just pay for more and higher paid cops and city paramedic/sometime firefighters – just like it did in Westminster when the unions piled onto a sales tax increase. This will not go over well.
What do you make of Bruce W. reportedly supporting it, then?
Is it possible to limit this entirely to existing pension obligations? If so, does that keep Fullerton off Westminster’s path?
Doesn’t this have to go before the voters in any event?
POBs don’t go to the voters. It’s an end run. The money freed up by the added revenue can go wherever the council votes it – and that means “public safety” will snatch 70% of it right off the bat – all of it if they can. And nobody is better off for the scheme.
I doubt if Bruce is for this. I certainly hope not.
I’m told that Whitaker DID ask to agendize this, probably at staff’s urging. I don’t know why he would ever support this.
Correction: new property taxes are the de facto collateral – should the plan go south.
Interesting. Thanks for the reporting.
Here’s some nice news! Chapman University engages in a little moral repair work!
Tweet from CNN’s Ana Cabrera: “Chapman University refusing to help former employee John Eastman try to block his university emails from January 6 committee”
Eastman would make one hell of a jailhouse lawyer! Put him to good use!
And did you hear about another friend of ours involved in this? Judge David O. Carter, who worked so hard to shelter our homeless; who always has federal marshals with him (altho sometimes he sneaks off without them) because he’s had death threats from both Aryan Nation and the Mexican Mafia; who ruled against this blog and for the Liberal OC (only because Pedroza didn’t bother defending himself) and called both blog owners “childish” ….
THAT Judge Carter ruled against Eastman on this and ordered him to turn over his e-mails!
Almost forgot about this picture from 2 years ago – La Palma Mayor Marshall Goodman, Judge Carter, me, and SQS. I know, I’m silly, but I love that picture. He was telling me about all his threats from gangs….
Pic by Michele Martinez.
He won’t do it.
But if he was using a Chapman account, uh-oh. Either way it looks like jail for this piece of canine excrement.
I should’ve said… Carter denied Eastman’s request to order Chapman to keep his e-mails secret.
If Chapman University had a face, it would be grinning ear-to-ear at the prospect of complying with this order.
I guess that Eastman is going to try to appeal up the latter all the way to the state and then federal Supreme Courts. I don’t think he’ll be granted an injunction, though; company control of that which is produced on a work email account is pretty well-established law.
I wonder what he’s trying so hard to hide? [Grins]
Here’s an example of why we have Open Threads.
https://voiceofoc.org/2022/01/city-of-anaheim-fights-back-against-lawsuit-alleging-officials-secretly-conspired-to-sell-angel-stadium/
We can laugh about the squirming of the morons.