Just time for some listiness today:
[1] Former City Council candidate Kitty Jaramillo files suit to impose districting on Fullerton.
The suit filed by Vivian Jaramillo, 60, alleges that Fullerton’s at-large voting “impairs the ability of certain races to elect candidates of their choice or influence the outcome of elections conducted in the city of Fullerton.”
…
Under Fullerton’s at-large system, voters anywhere in the city can vote for any council candidate. In district-based elections, a city is divided into subdivisions. A candidate must be elected by voters who live in the same subdivision.
…
An Orange County Register article in January listed Fullerton as one of eight O.C. cities vulnerable to lawsuits alleging illegal limitations on Latinos’ ability to be elected.
Since 1994, 7 percent of the winners of the city’s council races have been Latino. According to the O.C. registrar of voters, 23 percent of Fullerton citizens of voting age are Latino.
Sounds pretty compelling. City Manager Joe Felz says that he’ll brief the Council on it. Anaheim, take note.
[2] Let’s start arguing about the newly proposed (and significantly downsized) water bond:
California voters will be asked to authorize $7.5 billion to bolster the state’s water supply, infrastructure and ecosystems in November, as lawmakers and Gov. Jerry Brown on Wednesday struck a long-sought deal to move a new water bond to the ballot.
An extraordinary drought that has strained California’s water supply spurred a concerted push for a new water bond. Lawmakers moved to replace an $11.1 billion previously slated for the ballot, convinced that voters would reject it.
Instead, voters will see a $7.5 billion measure that contains significantly less money for Delta restoration. The final sum represents a compromise both from Republicans, who called for $3 billion for surface storage projects, and from Brown, who sought an overall total closer to $6 billion.
…
In the end, the vote tally masked the twisting and divisive debate that preceded Wednesday’s deal. Assembly members voted 77-2 in favor of the measure and then broke into applause. In the Senate, the margin was 37-0.
It’s hard to argue with a vote of that margin — but it’s not impossible. As a candidate for Water Board — whoops, haven’t really written about that; maybe next week! — I want to hear from the public. So speak! (Hint as to my position: I think that repair of leaky subsurface infrastructure, promoting conservation, and keeping reprobate corporations like Nestle from drinking Southern California’s milkshake by tapping into aquifers north of here need to be among our very high priorities.)
[3] And finally, Loretta Sanchez in a clingy wet blouse:
It doesn’t look like you can embed the video, but this appears to be a link.
And here’s a photo:
Say what you will about Loretta — and no doubt you will — but the lady has panache. Poor woman had no idea what was coming — and you know that she HATES being shown in public in a clingy dress! But since she was a good sport, she gets her message promoted anyway:
I took the ALS #IceBucketChallenge! Michael Motherway, an inspirational resident fighting Lou Gehrig’s disease who I met earlier this year, challenged me.
Now I’m passing it along to my some of my colleagues in Orange County: Ed R. Royce, Congressman Darrell E. Issa, Dana Rohrabacher, Alan Lowenthal, and my sister, Linda T. Sanchez – you have 24 hours!
If you want to help join the cause and find a cure for ALS, visit http://www.alsa.org/
If they would just raffle off the opportunity to throw buckets of ice at Ed Royce, Dana Rohrabacher, and Darrell Issa, we could retire the federal debt. I’d say Mimi Walters and Diane Harkey, too — but they deserve to be on ice rather than ice being on them.
This is your Weekend Open Thread. Talk about that, or whatever else you’d like, within reasonable bounds of decency and decorum.

Since you bought up Nestle, it is my understanding that their bottling plant is on Native American tribal land somewhere in the Mojave desert. Can’t they do what they want because that is sovereign land?
And why did you have to bring up that Sanchez is wearing a clingy blouse? From a female perspective that makes think about wet tee shirt contests and how degrading that is…but if women want to participate that is their right and choice…. would you have mentioned that if it were Ed Royce… never mind that would be creepy.
Incorect.
Like most water bottlers they are in Ontario, CA. Nestle Water AKA Arrowhead is located at:
https://www.google.com/maps/preview?q=5772+jurupa+st+ontario+ca&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=0x80c34ab7cc62e4a7:0x2943eb77b0161b2a,5772+E+Jurupa+St,+Ontario,+CA+91761&gl=us&ei=ZKLuU6WiFdGFogTl64G4Ag&ved=0CBwQ8gEwAA
It has historically been a good place to work with good wages and benefits.
Of course the parent company Nestle based in Glendale just closed the old Chef Bros (Hot Pockets) factory in Canoga Park, eliminating nearly 400 direct jobs and another 500 related. They are going to Kentucky. LA County has become near impossible to operate a large scale food manufacturing plant, without MAJOR concessions.
The Chef Bros. was a big blow. Speaking of big blow’s I thought the Sanchez video….Nevermind.
I don’t think that, despite the name Arrowhead, it’s on tribal land. (I see that nameless identifies its location below.) Even if it were, in a conflict with federal law about something that goes beyond mere self-governance, as water rights would do, I think that they’d lose.
Inge, what thought do you think that this was intended to evoke? Loretta loves being riské, and she can pull it off. Good for her, if that’s her pleasure.
If Ed Royce did this, wearing a top like that, it would be on the front page every day. Every. Single. Day.
This where I read about Nestle… (although your joke about Arrowhead was a good one)… http://rt.com/usa/172764-nestle-california-bottling-plant/
As for Loretta, I didn’t know she likes to be risqué, good for her!
“As for Loretta, I didn’t know she likes to be risqué…”
Well, you’re the only one.
i have seen ed royce at the beach, it is not a very pretty sight
I am glad you missed the story of him running naked down the street… http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2012/03/can-congressman-ed-royce-be-protected-from-konys-snap-fap-black-magic/
Targeted ad displayed on this post::
Orange County Movers
executivemovingsystems.com
We’re in OC and ready to move you! North American,Movers you can trust
Whenever the question of district elections comes up, I’m compelled to point out that there are much better options for conducting multi-seat elections, as I pointed out for Anaheim long ago:
http://kitchenmudge.wordpress.com/2012/08/08/are-we-as-smart-as-tasmanians/
It only requires slightly intelligent people to implement it. Yeah, I know.
Yeah. You know.
You’re right — and yet where the more intelligent systems have been tried in the U.S., voters have fled from them screaming. I wish it were not so.
Not the voters, just the political machines that influence voters when they’re not paying attention:
https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/polit/damy/articles/Brief%20History%20of%20PR.htm
“when they’re not paying attention”…. Yeah, I know.
True, it’s working just fine in municipalities where it has been adopted. The US military has also used it our of convenience for overseas voters, and, most famously, it is used by the Academy Awards to avoid, you guessed it, the spoiler factor.
*Number one is interesting: Go Kitty Jaramillo ….go girl. You are on the right track. As far a Loretta goes………Hey….it’s summer gear! As far a Arrowhead goes…….they missed our water delivery for the first time ever today.
” As far a Arrowhead goes…….they missed our water delivery for the first time ever today.”
Actually, our water did come yesterday but the driver filling in for our driver
on vacation…..hid our water….but we found it this morning!
I found this post in regards to the newest craze via Loretta Sanchez video … “getting ice water dumped on you for ALS” any thoughts?
http://www.vice.com/read/dumping-a-bucket-of-ice-on-your-head-does-not-make-you-a-philanthropist-813
“They say a prosecutor could get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich, and this always seemed like hyperbole, until Friday night a Texas grand jury announced an indictment of governor Rick Perry. The “crime” for which Perry faces a sentence of 5 to 99 years in prison is vetoing funding for a state agency. The conventions of reporting — which treat the fact of an indictment as the primary news, and its merit as a secondary analytic question — make it difficult for people reading the news to grasp just how farfetched this indictment is.”
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/08/rick-perry-indictment-is-unbelievably-ridiculous.html?wpsrc=nymag
I doubt that you could explain the rationale for the indictment even if the alternative was the immediate amputation of one of your healthy limbs.
(Hint: extortion.)
Actually – Diamond – the rational for the indictment in this case is “coercion.”
Coercion:
The intimidation of a victim to compel the individual to do some act against his or her will by the use of psychological pressure, physical force, or threats. The crime of intentionally and unlawfully restraining another’s freedom by threatening to commit a crime, accusing the victim of a crime, disclosing any secret that would seriously impair the victim’s reputation in the community, or by performing or refusing to perform an official action lawfully requested by the victim, or by causing an official to do so.
Do Perry’s action constitute coercion (?) – doesn’t appear so …..
Coercion of a lawful act by a threat of lawful action is protected free expression. See [Wurtz v. Risley, 719 F.2d 1438, 1441 (9th Cir.1983)].
I do not require you to amputate a limb for your error of legal opinion – however, it would be nice if you would STFU for one day on this blog.
http://thisistwitchy.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/screencap1.png?w=430&h=150
Just found this on Yahoo – might be of interest?
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/how-much–100-is-worth-in-your-state-152310027.html
*Sweet Loretta and the Ice Bucket Wet T-Shirt Contest……was great. Couldn’t find this video anywhere else on the web. You guys scored big time. Now, if only Sofia Vergara
will do the same thing…..talk about going viral…….
Orly Taitz ……
*Little doubt “you can’t tell the players without programs and uniforms”…..as our
MLB buddies…say.
https://www.facebook.com/ChicksOnTheRight/photos/a.205470340493.271404.195530355493/10154478424680494/?type=1
Why do right-wingers have the worst photoshopping skills? (Then there’s grammar, spelling, semantics & all that, but you’re tired of hearing about it.)
And don’t tell me about “liberal art majors”. These are skills people learn in life, not school.
But don’t you think that the thought was funny Mudge? I know you chuckled.
The thought was fine, but much was lost in the execution.
*Pappy put it this way: “They are living in their own world!” Regardless of the facts….of course!
There’s one of those floating around with “Ann Coulter” in place of Pelosi.
Question is, which came first?
Is the Coulter one as bad? Took me about one minute to do this:
https://kitchenmudge.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/improvedpelosi.jpg
Loretta Sanchez in a clingy wet blouse…
Speaking of wet blouses:
http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2009/06/02/the-making-of-the-%E2%80%9Cloretta-sanchez-scandal%E2%80%9D/
If you didn’t receive one of her vulgar holiday postcards, perhaps you’d like to send Loretta Sanchez one of your own, thanking her for her YES vote Supporting HR 4681, the FY 2015 Intelligence Authorization Act, one of whose provisions FURTHER strips your Constitutional Rights by (to quote from the facebook page of
Rep Justin Amash, at https://www.facebook.com/repjustinamash/posts/812569822115759 )
“The intelligence reauthorization bill, which the House will vote on today, contains a troubling new provision that for the first time statutorily authorizes spying on U.S. citizens without legal process.
Last night, the Senate passed an amended version of the intelligence reauthorization bill with a new Sec. 309—one the House never has considered. Sec. 309 authorizes “the acquisition, retention, and dissemination” of nonpublic communications, including those to and from U.S. persons. The section contemplates that those private communications of Americans, obtained without a court order, may be transferred to domestic law enforcement for criminal investigations.
To be clear, Sec. 309 provides the first statutory authority for the acquisition, retention, and dissemination of U.S. persons’ private communications obtained without legal process such as a court order or a subpoena.
Passed 325-100”
Voting of California Representatives by District-
from https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/113-2014/h558
YEA R LaMalfa, Doug CA 1st NAY D Huffman, Jared CA 2nd
YEA D Thompson, MikeCA 5th NAY D Garamendi, JohnCA 3rd
YEA D Bera, Ami CA 7th NAY R McClintock, Tom CA 4th
YEA R Cook, Paul CA 8th NAY D Matsui, Doris CA 6th
YEA D McNerney, Jerry CA 9th NAY D Lee, Barbara CA 13th
YEA R Denham, Jeff CA 10th NAY D Speier, Jackie CA 14th
YEA D Miller, George CA 11th NAY D Swalwell, Eric CA 15th
YEA D Pelosi, Nancy CA 12th NAY D Honda, Mike CA 17th
YEA D Costa, Jim CA 16th NAY D Eshoo, Anna CA 18th
YEA R Valadao, David CA 21st NAY D Lofgren, Zoe CA 19th
YEA R Nunes, Devin CA 22nd NAY D Farr, Sam CA 20th
YEA R McCarthy, Kevin CA 23rd NAY D Chu, Judy CA 27th
YEA D Capps, Lois CA 24th NAY D Bass, Karen CA 37th
YEA R McKeon, Buck CA 25th NAY D Takano, Mark CA 41st
YEA D Brownley, Julia CA 26th NAY D Waters, Maxine CA 43rd
YEA D Schiff, Adam CA 28th NAY D Hahn, Janice CA 44th
YEA D Cárdenas, Tony CA 29th NAY D Lowenthal, Alan CA 47th
YEA D Sherman, Brad CA 30th NAY R Rohrabacher, Dana CA 48th
YEA D Napolitano, GraceCA 32nd
YEA D Waxman, Henry CA 33rd
YEA D Becerra, Xavier CA 34th
YEA D Ruiz, Raul CA 36th NO VOTE R Miller, Gary CA 31st
YEA D Sánchez, Linda CA 38th NO VOTE D Negrete McLeod,
Gloria CA 35th
YEA R Royce, Ed CA 39th NO VOTE R Campbell, JohnCA 45th
YEA D Roybal-Allard, Lucille CA 40th
YEA R Calvert, Ken CA 42nd
YEA D Sanchez, Loretta CA 46th
YEA R Issa, Darrell CA 49th
YEA R Hunter, Duncan CA 50th
YEA D Vargas, Juan CA 51st
YEA D Peters, Scott CA 52nd
YEA D Davis, Susan CA 53rd
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/breaking-congress-secretly-okd-nsa-spying-domestic-criminal-cases-focused-torture/
What do I WANT for Christmas? MY Constitutional RIGHTS Back !!
Sorry about the spacing- I HAD it in 2 columns- it got mashed in submission.
It’s funny how the YEA votes include so many right wingers and left wingers who find common cause in giving away liberty.
It’s funnier how 17 of the 21 NO votes (81%), but only 18 of the 29 YES votes (62%), were Democrats. But otherwise, the proportion of Republicans voting YES (38%) was twice as high as the proportion of Republican voting NO (19%). So clearly, both sides have bales to toss, but you need more pitchfork.
Well, it’s true that w-a-a-a-a-a-y too many members of the “conservative” party are willing to give the security state apparatus too much power; but if I were a Democrat I’d be wondering about all those Ds in the Yea column who in other matters are always nattering about privacy.
I am a Democrat and indeed I am wondering. For most (Pelosi, for one), I guess that the “must-pass” nature of the bill overrode common sense. That bodes very badly for the next two years.