.
.
.

Blenheim Equisports: “Privatizing the Profits, Socializing the Costs.”
ATTENTION SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO VOTERS, TAXPAYERS AND RESIDENTS! Your Council, which meets again on Tuesday March 16, will be making some big decisions on the future of the Rancho Mission Viejo Riding Park, which has been a corrupt and polluting burden on us for well over a decade. Here is an open letter your neighbor Kim McCarthy recently sent to the Council, with all the background info you need printed below.
Thank you, Councilmember Troy Bourne, for leading the way to open up the bidding at the Eastern Open Space. Finally a wise business decision made on behalf of the residents of San Juan regarding this property! Hopefully the open bidding will bring some great opportunities for families to begin to use this property as well as garner revenue for our city.
Councilmembers, a recent Register article also states, “The city has committed to spend about $2 million to stabilize creek banks and complete the removal of an un-permitted crossing between the park and riding area. “
This is outrageous, to say the least! Blenheim Equisports’ actions destabilized the creek banks, and directly discharged horse waste and gray waste into San Juan Creek, all while operating without a permit. Why would you obligate us taxpayers to pay for what Blenheim did, and is contractually required to fix?
Councilmembers, think of it this way: would you continue to rent your family’s home to the very renters who severely damaged your property, and refused to make the repairs per their contract with you, culminating in a lawsuit which ultimately cost you millions?
Assuming the answer is NO, why are you considering making this decision on behalf of your constituents whom you took an oath to represent?
Furthermore, please detail for residents what is being done by the city to collect the millions of dollars The Riding Park / Blenheim owe to San Juan taxpayers?
In lieu of transparency, and checks and balances in fair governance, your answers will be published on the Orange Juice Blog.
Respectfully,
Kim McCarthy, 20-year resident and former publisher of Community Common Sense.
BACKGROUND
The Register recently printed a piece, largely a puff piece, about the long travails of the Rancho Mission Viejo Riding Park, entitled “San Juan Capistrano Lets Non-Equestrian Operators Bid to Operate Riding Park.” This Riding Park, on land acquired by the city of SJC with the help of then-Supervisor Pat Bates, is a classic OC boondoggle negotiated “on the City’s behalf” by former Sheriff Brad Gates, to the total benefit of billionaire South County Mega-Developer Tony Moiso. Very few SJC voters and taxpayers who have been subsidizing this park for over a decade even know it exists, let alone can they afford to use it.
And this was before the Parks’ POLLUTION OF OUR WATER became such a problem. The first photo in the Register story bears a caption claiming the City wants an operator to “help finish improvements required for preventing runoff into the nearby creek.” No, these are NOT “improvements.” They are MANDATORY FIXES (mandatory if the owner, Blenheim Equisports, wants to continue to operate their private business on our Eastern Open Space.) And these fixes are mandated by a ruling stemming from a 2017 lawsuit by Orange County Coastkeeper (their largest lawsuit to date – $2.9 million) at the direction of the San Diego Water Board.
Some of us humble “Swallows” were actually the whistleblowers instigating that lawsuit!
You Orange County readers, we understand, know nothing about this – hell, most SJC voters know nothing about it. The unfortunately out-of-print watchdog newsletter Community Common Sense wrote a lot about it, and here are a couple of their more informative pieces below:
From CCS, April 2018 Cover Story
Riding a Mountain of Debt
by Jim Reardon, April 2018
The City of San Juan Capistrano has borrowed $58.5 million related to the RMV Riding Park, almost double the amount authorized by voters in the 2009 Open Space measure. The excess cost of this borrowing is a $1.86 million annual interest charge that is quietly being paid from the city’s general fund, apparently with the consent of the council majority, who are publicly silent on the matter.
In 2009, voters authorized the city to issue $30 million in tax-exempt bonds for the purpose of “Open Space” within the city, guaranteeing repayment of this debt, with their homes and property within SJC. An ad valorum tax appears on annual property tax bills to cover the cost of the original borrowing. The city then secretly used $27.5 million from the bond proceeds to purchase the Riding Park, a parcel that was actually outside the city limits at the time the purchase was negotiated and announced to the public.
Purchase of the Riding Park brought with it a relationship with Blenheim, the private promoter of the equestrian events that occur at the location. Blenheim exclusively provides management and maintenance of the facility in a business arrangement that has been called into question by city staff. The tax-exempt bonds used to purchase the land provide benefit to a private for-profit business, an arrangement that is contrary to IRS regulations and threatens the tax-exempt status of the original bonds.
After eight years of behind-the-scenes disagreement as to the legality of the Blenheim relationship, the city council quietly authorized the issuance of taxable bonds to replace the original tax-exempt debt. Taxable bonds are costlier to repay compared to tax-exempt bonds, but in the low-interest-rate environment of the time, the new taxable bonds were less expensive than the tax-exempt bonds. Nevertheless, the new bonds exceed the $30 million amount authorized by the voters in 2009, and specifically do not comply with the voter-approved ballot measure which requires the city to authorize tax-exempt bonds to finance Open Space.
In April 2017, the city issued $28.5 million in “advance refunding” taxable bonds pledged directly against the original 2009 voter authorization, and deposited the proceeds into a special account. However, the original tax-exempt bonds remain outstanding, and will remain so until August 2019, when the original bonds are eligible to be repaid. In the meantime, interest costs of $150,000 per month for the new bonds is being paid from city coffers, further aggravating the city’s oft-mentioned structural deficit.
All of this is an elaborate scheme to finance a for-profit enterprise at taxpayer expense.
No matter how much prestige or benefit the equestrian events bring to the area, the blatant disregard of voter-approved ballot language and abuse of debt guaranteed by taxpayers is unconscionable. The silence of councilmembers Reeve, Ferguson, Marryot and Farias (Pam Patterson has consistently voted “no”) signals their complicity in this scheme.
“Eastern Open Space,” annotated map
From Community Common Sense, April 2018
The map below illustrates the result
when cronies are given carte blanche to spend taxpayer dollars.
In 2008 SJC Councilmembers Mark Nielsen, Sam Allevato, Lon Uso, Tom Hribar & Laura Freese convinced taxpayers to tax themselves $30 million to protect open space. The result was what two-time former Mayor Dr. Roy Byrnes called “the worst real estate deal in San Juan history.”
Next they allowed private citizens Brad Gates, Dick Paulsen and Tom Lunnen to negotiate purchase of property outside city boundaries, exempting them from filing the required conflict of interest forms – despite Gates’ longtime business dealings and personal relationship with the seller, Rancho Mission Viejo Company CEO Tony Moiso.
Behind closed doors the Council then approved the negotiated property restrictions and dictated uses specified by the seller.
HALF of this property was ALREADY protected open space. A private business, Blenheim, monopolizes the most usable acreage at taxpayer expense. A recent study reported only 8% of SJC residents ever visit the riding park.
Due to the City’s lack of due diligence in acquiring and maintaining this property, the San Diego Water Board notified the City about their lack of compliance in protecting San Juan Creek from continued pollution. City administration’s repeated failure to comply over an 18-month period prompted non-profit environmental protection organization OC Coastkeeper to file a lawsuit. The City is now at risk of being fined up to $55,000 per day dating back to 2006, for polluting Federal Waters.
Taxpayer-funded costs continue to add up on the “open space,” a few of which are noted below, as annotations to the above map:
1. 14,000 residential units being built across the street from the “open space” on the other side of Ortega Highway (in “Sendero,” as indicated), and across Antonio Parkway and La Pata.
2. “Reata Park” is the only other usable parcel in the open space. Although it is rarely used, taxpayers were charged $575,000 on a road and signal leading from Reata to the Ranch’s development across Ortega.
3. 2.4 acres adjoining Reata Park were previously leased to a developer who built 35 homes on the former Oaks site. City leased it to developer for $4800 per year while taxpayers paid approximately $35,000 in interest on the property. Developer reportedly leased approximately 9 horse turn-outs for $1000 a month. City administration is still refusing to open up the property to the public for equestrian use.
4. Development has begun on 5 million square feet of retail / commercial approved on the Ranch property across the street from the “open space.” Gelson’s supermarket and other stores are already impacting SJC merchants.
5. The “Riding Park” is the most usable parcel in the “Eastern Open Space.” At 70 acres, it comprises about half the 132 acres of open space, but has been leased to a private commercial equestrian business. SJC taxpayers are severely restricted from using it.
6. Blenheim has been allowed to operate without the required “Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation” permit. Runoff from the Riding Park, including from horse wash stations on San Juan Creek, triggered a lawsuit for polluting the federally protected creek. Cost to restore damage to the creek is unknown.
7. Councilmembers Reeve, Maryott, and Farias voted to spend more than $800,000 installing unnecessary water/sewer line at Riding Park. Although Blenheim’s contract required them to provide their own utilities (including water), sewer line is being installed to remove Blenheim’s waste water.
8. Per the purchase agreement and county maps, San Juan Creek is to be put through to connect to La Pata.
*
POWERPOINT:
A tour of Rancho Mission Viejo Riding Park
at San Juan Capistrano’s “Eastern Open Space”
Health & Safety Issues
Potential Fire Hazards
Long-term Tenancies / Sub-letting
Hazardous Waste
Other Prohibited Uses
Preferential Access
Revenue Considerations
Community Common Sense
Community Common Sense was published by concerned residents from 2009 -2018. We did not make money; we spent our time and our own money to get the information out to residents. We were harassed, bullied and threatened, along with frequent character assassination, by those whose personal agendas were dependent on council majority votes. Below was our mission statement:
“The CCS is a non-partisan community watchdog publication, distributed to homes and businesses in our local communities.
We were established in 2009 by a group of residents who recognized that tax dollars are often spent in ways that enrich a select few, while average residents are left with the resulting increases to cost of living, traffic and debt.
We believe knowledge is power, and are committed to reporting facts not offered in other publications. Aided by Public Records Act requests for information and extensive research, we print fact-based information about fiscal and quality of life issues which enables residents to make educated decisions.”
For more on the Riding Park, see:
CCS April 2018, Riding a Mountain of Debt (cover story)
Eastern Open Space (maps/facts pages 4,5)
CCS November 2017, Council Members Approve $800,000 “Unnecessary” Water/Sewer Line at Riding Park, Despite Federal Lawsuit, Lack of Permit (cover story)
CCS September 2017, Blenheim’s Equestrian Business Operating Without Permits, Exposing Taxpayers to Fines
The Pollution of San Juan Creek is NOT ABOUT HORSES ( Guest column page 3)
Undoing Damage to San Juan Creek Could Take Years (pages 4,5)
CCS June 2017, City Sued over Riding Park, San Juan Creek Violations
Whistleblowers Allege Retaliation for Filing Code Violation Complaints (page 1)
SJC Equestrian Coalition “Economic Study” Questionable at Best (Guest Column)
CCS November 2016, City’s Failure to Resolve On-going Code Violations Prompts Calls for Action
City Manager; a 9-Month Review (page 5)
CCS April 2016, City Considers $500,000 Water Line to Riding Park Property
*Nice well reported article. Only one Problem: “The Ride”. Some people are Rich and Famous and Some people are just Rich. Probably best not to mess with Mother Nature!
It is unfortunate that the taxpayers floated a bond for 30 million for this property and must now pay a total of 11 million dollars to mitigate the problems that the City Managers and City Councils continually bury their head in the sand about the problems.
The problems the City agreed to mitigate were required to be completed by now. Yet, the City has done nothing as the creek the empties out to Dana Point Harbor is polluted with horse manure, concrete, rebar, human waste, etc. All coming from taxpayer owned property.
It is disgusting. Sam Allevato and Brad Gates should be ashamed of themselves for what they have done. Wait, didn’t Brad Gates once own the property next to this ? Yep.
The amount of malfeasance displayed here is overwhelming and maybe smaller bite size chunks might be more palatable for the readers to absorb.
Our attention span has been diminished by Instagram and Tiktok and this post borders on bloviating.
It’s really about five pieces on the same topic. The author, who had been the publisher of Community Common Sense, had just discovered that all the old issues were archived in a nearly irretrievable format… and I helped her get some of them back. So… this post was a little unusual that way, but yeah there’s obviously a lot to say about this huge clusterfuck.
The RMV model is to offload responsibility to government for things that make its holdings more valuable. They own the 5th District Supervisor. Always have.
Following San Juan City Council actions for over 10 years, I can only come to the conclusion it is operated much like Organized Crime, funded by taxpayers yet benefitting Private Business and powerful land owners/developers.
Who or What government agencies protect the taxpayers from this? I cant find any… The government agencies I’ve gone to for help with extensive proof, simply ignore the facts or protect local city government and private businesses from accountability.
*Kim, you could apply your thesis to almost every city and town in the USA.
Developer Money is still the Milk of most communities….both as Campaign
Contributors and back pocket deals with certain city officials. But as Hyman
Roth said: “This is the business we have chosen!”
*If you want to change anything….pay more attention to who you vote for.
So what about all the other creatures and critters that you claim pollute the river bed? That water is so polluted by the time it gets here the horses are probably helping with the ammonia’s killing bacteria’s. The homeless, rabbits coyote joggers etc all also crap and piss in the river bed from top all the way down to ocean. The horse is the last visual before entering ocean so it’s got to be them. What about the truck yard up 0rtega a bit past Antonio, I bet a million dollars fuel, concrete, oil critters and human waste are in the riverbed but easier to blame and take so you few can profit. Lose the horse you lost San Juan Capistrano. Boycott parade too because horse crap in the street people puke this day from parting.. which is worse?pros and cons to everything…. leave the horses alone. Not one word with all those pictures said about living conditions for the people who don’t bitch.put up more hotels because streets are not crowded enough. The freeway is a nightmare but yet you want to bring in morethis probably makes no sense cause I’m so mad at your high horse your all on
About the author’s name: [sic]
Somebody woke up mad on Easter morning.