.
.
.
So. AB 448, the long-awaited OC Housing Trust Fund bill that will go a long way to solving our homelessness crisis, sailed thru the assembly last month with nearly ZERO dissent (two Republicans Democrats I never heard of voted no, out of 80 assemblypeople) and is now in the Senate. Our OC delegation is unanimously in support across ideological lines – from the bill’s authors liberal Democrat Sharon Quirk Silva and corporate Dem Tom Daly, through our garden variety Repugs Janet Nguyen and Pat Bates, to fiscal conservative co-author John Moorlach and even alt-right Trumpie Travis Allen – you can’t get any farther “right” than that.
OR CAN YOU? In a July 11 OC Register column, “OC Supervisor Michelle Steel” found that little slice of space where you could criticize the bill from the right – a feat of acrobatic agility that required a healthy dose of both lies and fearmongering.
Why did I put Michelle’s name in scare quotes, you ask? Oh, that. Anything that’s ostensibly written, said, or done by the second district supervisor is actually written, said or done by her Grinch-like hubby, the longtime California Republican Party power broker Shawn Steel. Michelle is just his (relatively) pretty face and cat’s-paw. I don’t say that cuz I’m sexist or racist, but from twelve years of observing her useless, brainless performances on the state Board of Equalization and county Board of Supervisors, her giggly demeanor and non-sequiturs on the dais, her frequent reassurances to voters that “Shawn and I are just regular people” and she “still presses Shawn’s shirts,” and her regular protestations at Supervisor meetings that she “doesn’t eat dog or cat.” I mean, her e-mail missives actually come out on her husband’s letterhead. So let’s dispense with Michelle and focus on Shawn as author, except to quickly remind you that if Dana Rohrabacher isn’t defeated this year he plans to hand off his 32-year Congressional seat to the couple.
Shawn Steel’s surprising assault on the housing trust fund bill, apart from its dishonesty, is just one more element of his attempt to drag OC Republicans to the far, racist, xenophobic “right.” Worshipful of President Trump (in a county that went with the Democratic candidate for the first time since the 30’s) he’s been the driving force behind the OC Supes’ and many OC cities’ embracing the President’s draconian immigration policies and attacking our state’s legally upheld sanctuary stance. But is this the sort of guy Republicans should be listening to? His embrace of the racist Prop 187 back in the 90’s is the reason you guys’ party is so small, bitter and impotent in this state now. And Shawn Nelson‘s following the Steel lead on immigrant-bashing didn’t prevent THAT Shawn from coming in a distant fourth in his Congressional primary.
The county’s burgeoning homeless population is just one more target, along with immigrants, for Steel’s manipulative fearmongering. His repeated warnings of “large scale homeless and subsidized government housing in your backyard,” (putting aside the ever-expanding definition of people’s “backyard”) invites the response, “do you prefer these scary people OUTSIDE of houses, in your backyard, as is the case now?” But only half of the anti-homeless animus Steel stokes is about fear and disgust, there’s also the puritan judgment that these people don’t DESERVE housing if they can’t pay for it themselves.
What may have most provoked Senator John Moorlach – a humane and honest conservative of which there should be more in the Republican party – to pen his furious rebuke to Steel a few days later was the lazy and ignorant lie that AB 448 would raise taxes. But who knows, it may have been even more infuriating for Moorlach to hear the lazy and ignorant lies that AB 448 would “grow the size of government,” “take away local control,” and “increase the cost of market rate housing.” All ancient right-wing cliches that have no bearing on the bill under discussion. Roars the Sasquatch-resembling conservative:
“This is not leadership. This is classic NIMBYism and fearmongering… These assertions are false. In fact, the trust would claim state money our taxpayers already pay, not add even one Lincoln penny to existing levies. As to the market price of homes, it’s Economics 101: Increase the supply and the price will go down. The demand is there from the homeless; the question is whether we meet the supply.
“State laws passed last year in the 2017 Housing Package, such as Senate Bill 35, mandate more local housing construction. And federal Judge David O. Carter continues reviewing county homeless policies. If the housing trust is not enacted, the county and our 34 cities could lose all control over solutions.“
I have mixed feelings about the word NIMBY, which I use myself – sometimes of course it’s a good thing. There are some things NOBODY should have in their back yard, things that are NOT NEEDED or wanted period. Southeast Huntington Beach people do not need Poseidon in their back yard. San Clemente doesn’t need the 241 extension running through its back yards. And nobody needs a nuclear dump in their back yard. But these homeless folks are people, our former neighbors and fellow citizens, who could be YOU next year. These Horatio Alger homily-spinning homeowners grew up in a different time with a constantly growing economy and a sturdy social safety net, so they tend to not know or care what the fuck they’re talking about. And as long as our current Dickensian-level economic inequality grinds on and grows, partly due to decades of government policies favoring the enrichment of the rich, we’re going to need solutions involving the government, to help our fellow Americans live and be productive. Solutions like AB 448.
Vern out.
If Congressman Orville Redenbacher is re-elected in the 48th, this year look for Michelle Steel to run in 2020,to that congressional seat. This bill can and should be passed without question.
Dana will retire in 2019 forcing a special election so that Steel is the incumbent into 2020
That seems pretty likely. Republicans these days will spend any amount of public money to achieve a smaller and less representative electorate.
Like city wards and districts?
Seems like the right way to go to me! Why do Democrats oppose smaller and more local government?
I’m talking about turnout rather than district size. (I thought that that was obvious.) Districts and wards lead to a larger aggregate electorate because more people in the city (or other jurisdiction) will vote when they believe that their votes matter more, as they do under such a system.
Preferring to have a significant vote during a special election as opposed to an off-year election, and an off-year election as opposed to a primary election, and a primary election as opposed to a general election, is what I mean by desiring as “smaller electorate.” You guys like low-turnout. Republican leaders have been very explicit about this. I don’t think that you have any good basis to deny it.
Here, Rohrabacher ensuring that his replacement would be chosen in a low-turnout special election rather than a high term general election is simply vile and worthy of condemnation. If that’s what he’s up to, no fair-minded person should vote for him. Vote for Rouda, who will serve his term until Nov. 2020, and then you have a chance to vote him out. That’s functioning democracy rather than reliance on dirty tricks.
AB 448 creates a new regional bureaucracy with no provision for the redeployment/elimination of our vast existing government “homelessness” apparatus that has failed so miserably.
We already have housing authorities in Anaheim, Garden Grove, Santa Ana, and of course, the County of Orange. Cities’ “Successor Agencies” still maintain housing staff as a legacy of Redevelopment obligations.
Obviously this bill attempts to do what local governments are reluctant to do: develop “by-right” low-income housing.
Three things are virtually certain. This agency will be opaque as Hell, the neighbors of new government housing projects will be the last to learn of them, and the housing development costs will be ridiculous.
Ah, yes. The infamous Anaheim Housing Authority.
Hey, look! Bonds!
*Which OX gets Gored? BY WHOM? You guys are truly smoking the wrong weed type with that Round up stuff. This is a great bill, by partisan and make total sense. However, if guys in the Stinkin Lincoln Club, can put your Cigars out long enough to read the small print you might actually understand the words: Our Future!
Just a few corrections…sorry we were too excited: “This is a great bill, bi-partisan and it makes total sense!”
However, IF YOU GUYS in the Stinkin Lincoln Club, can put out your Cigars long enough to read through the smoke and small print…..you might actually grant the rest of the citizens of this State: “A Positive Future!”
*There is more but hopefully straightens out the big errors for time being!
There is no small print. The bill is one page long. I’ve read it.
Bipartisanship is no excuse for doing anything. Go back to sleep.
You’re confused.
*That’s your job……and we wouldn’t want to interfere with your work!
No, my job is trying to help you understand where to click when replying to a comment.
You missed. That’s the point.
But… you do have another job besides that, right?
Kidding
RC and DZ are OUR friends.
“They are from the Government and they are here to help us!”