GET BACK, LORETTA! Sweet Loretta Sanchez Thought She Was a Winner, Then She Learned She Shouldn’t Dab

.

.

.

Sweet Loretta Sanchez thought she was a winner, she was Absolutely Fab
On stage with Kamala, tried to get all hip-hop — then she learned she shouldn’t dab
Get Back!  Get Back!  Get Back to where you once belonged!  (GET BACK LORETTA!)

(I know, I know — Vern is the one with the professional license to do parody songs — but how can I resist?)

Let's just all thank God that Loretta didn't have a pen and an apple.

Let’s just all thank God that Loretta didn’t have a pen and an apple.

[Note: while I do volunteer as a coordinator for Kamala Harris’s campaign in Orange County, this piece is entirely my own opinion; I haven’t even consulted with the campaign before writing it.]

Reports of Wednesday’s U.S. Senate Debate have focused on the end of Rep. Loretta Sanchez’s closing statement and the beginning of Attorney General Kamala Harris’s tart and shade-laden rejoinder.  I have to disagree with CNN’s take that Kamala was “not amused” when Loretta Sanchez, perhaps having forgotten how to curtsy and not wanting to pry the mic out of its   She has a very good sense of humor and I’d bet that she was plenty amused, in a “laughs at” rather than “laughs with” sense.  She just had the presence of mind not to show it beyond noting that, as everyone could see, there really was a difference between the candidates on the podium.  Loretta, perhaps still confused by the lack of wild audience applause that prompted some sort of sea shanty jig from her after her intended coup de grace, interrupted her to say in a perhaps unintentional Laurel-and-Hardy intonation, that there certainly was.  And it was at that point that I went temporarily deaf and blind, so I don’t know if Loretta came after he shouting that she ain’t no holla back girl, or, seriously, God knows what.

If Harris didn’t look amused — and you may be able to judge for yourself based on the above screen show showing the sides of her mouth turned up in a broad smile — I have a theory as to why that might be.  She may have been calculating how much campaign money she could save by canceling all of her ad buys for the next month — because they are probably not going to be necessary.

I always like to give OC Weekly credit when they are really funny, and Gustavo’s semi-astonished article on Dabbergate is worth reading as is Gabriel’s somewhat more sympathetic take pointing out the source of Loretta’s inspiration — I’m not going to spoil it here — and raising the question of how her Debate Coach Sal Tinajero reacted when he saw that move, of which I’m betting he did not inform her, based on the fact that he didn’t sit on her to keep her from getting onto the stage at all.

OK, that’s the end of today’s story.  Woo-woo-woo!  Fist bump!  (coughing fit)

About Greg Diamond

Somewhat verbose attorney, semi-disabled and semi-retired, residing in northwest Brea. Occasionally ran for office against jerks who otherwise would have gonr unopposed. Got 45% of the vote against Bob Huff for State Senate in 2012; Josh Newman then won the seat in 2016. In 2014 became the first attorney to challenge OCDA Tony Rackauckas since 2002; Todd Spitzer then won that seat in 2018. Every time he's run against some rotten incumbent, the *next* person to challenge them wins! He's OK with that. Corrupt party hacks hate him. He's OK with that too. He does advise some local campaigns informally and (so far) without compensation. (If that last bit changes, he will declare the interest.) His daughter is a professional campaign treasurer. He doesn't usually know whom she and her firm represent. Whether they do so never influences his endorsements or coverage. (He does have his own strong opinions.) But when he does check campaign finance forms, he is often happily surprised to learn that good candidates he respects often DO hire her firm. (Maybe bad ones are scared off by his relationship with her, but they needn't be.)