.
.
.
This is both a “feel-good” story and a “smack-yourself-in-the-head-for-not-realizing-this first” story about how the solutions to major social problems — like student absenteeism among poorer students — may not actually be so much a matter of building character or increasing parental involvement or keeping kids away from drugs or giving them free MacBooks or anything else discussed in academic papers or legislative chambers.
To find out what those solutions are, though, you may have to do something unusual — even radical. You have to find out what’s really going on in people’s lives.
As I occasionally have to remind people, before I became a lawyer I had an academic career as a social and political psychologist. One continual theme I recognized in the fields, which share a focus the study of human motivation, is that a major motivation often omitted from standard motivational models (which tend to be economically driven because it’s easier and more amenable to quantification) is that people want to avoid embarrassment. Social psychological studies show that people will literally choose paths far likelier to lead to their own deaths in order to avoid embarrassment.
This makes sense from an evolutionary perspective: we’re social creatures, we use bonds with others to protect us and advance us in society, and the potential or actual infliction of embarrassment is a main way to enforce — and cause people to internalize — social norms. It’s also a top way to enforce stratification in social status. Essentially, infliction of pain and embarrassment are the main tools of bullying — but that takes us away from today’s topic.
As an aside, the most repulsive aspect of the political blogosphere — highly visible at Cunningham’s blogs and Chmielewski’s debased post-Prevatt version of Liberal OC — involves using anonymous personas (who may be rewarded in coin or access to power, or who may be people using sock puppets to rally agreement for themselves) to gratuitously insult those who violate social norms (by, for example, fighting against corruption by the powerful.) The point of the exercise is to signal to bystanders how much they will suffer if they too take such public positions. And, of course, most people comply — because, again, people will often go more to extreme lengths to avoid embarrassment than actual physical pain.
Literally training oneself not to give a ripe goddamn about what those sorts of people say is one of the most important steps in becoming an activist. “Whisper campaigns” will destroy you if you let them; but so will the fear of them. Public anonymous attacks, making one wonder who in your circle could be making them, are in some ways worse. But if you learn to let go of worries about embarrassment, emanating from people for whom such attacks are probably their best chance at winning what they want, then you become free. And demonstrating that one need not be destroyed by rabid anonymous haters in turn helps free others from their influence.
Zzzzzz … HUH? I think that I may have passed out for a couple of paragraphs there. I remember typing something about “stratification in social status,” and then I woke up with a start just now and there are a couple of extra paragraphs on the page! How strange — I’ll go back and read them later.
Anyway, what I wanted to talk about today before that brief reverie was this story, which tells a heart-warming and hope-fueling tale of brilliance and heroism by a public school official. That official, Dr. Melody Gunn, would probably not admit to either brilliance or heroism — she was just doing her job the way that it should be done — but she’s certainly a brilliant hero in my book, and (my guess is) in the books of many of the parents of the children that she has helped.
Dr. Melody Gunn, the former principal of Gibson Elementary in St. Louis, couldn’t figure out why student attendance was on the low side. All of Gibson’s kids were provided free or reduced lunches, and the school facilitated transportation.
In talking to parents, Gunn discovered that many didn’t have easy access to washing machines. Or if they did have machines, they couldn’t always use them because they couldn’t afford detergent, or their electricity had been shut off. For these families, laundry had to take a backseat to more pressing needs such as food and rent.
It turned out that when students didn’t have clean clothes, they often stayed home from school out of embarrassment. Logan, an eighth-grader, spoke about how difficult it is for others to understand his problem: “I think people don’t talk about not having clean clothes because it makes you want to cry or go home or run away or something. It doesn’t feel good.”
Gunn reached out to the Whirlpool company to see if it could help, and it donated a washer and dryer to her school. She then invited students who had missed more than 10 days of school to bring in their clothes for laundering. Whirlpool later gave 16 more schools in districts in St. Louis and Fairfield, California, washers and dryers through a new program.
“After just one month, we saw an impact,” Gunn tells CityLab. The more long-term results of the program have actually been remarkable. The first year saw over 90 percent of tracked students increase their attendance, with those most in need of the service averaging an increase of almost 2 weeks. Teachers surveyed reported that 95 percent of participants showed more motivation in class and were more apt to participate in extra-curricular activities. The results support research demonstrating that chronic absenteeism isn’t because of kids’ lack of smarts or motivation, but is largely due to coming from a low-income household.
I swiped one more paragraph than I should have — I’m guessing that the publication won’t mind too much — so click on that link to read the rest.
Let’s be clear on one more thing: yes, as you may infer, this absolutely IS “socialism” — albeit socialism writ very small. Whirlpool theoretically sells fewer washing machines as a result (although it’s pretty clear that the families of these children can’t afford them.) It might also be called nanny-statism as well, by some definitions. But look: kids who are perfectly capable of learning and are held back only because poverty leads them to embarrassment are learning now — and anyone who values a less uneducated population, which I’m afraid not everyone does, should be celebrating this.
What can you do? Well, a bunch of people are running for school board over the next ten weeks or so. Maybe you can ask them what they think of this story!
This is your new, clean, and fresh-smelling Weekend Open Thread. Talk about this story, or whatever else you’d like, within reasonable bounds of decency, decorum, and discretion.
This isn’t “socialism.” This is philanthropy -. unless you want to count the cost of detergent and electricity paid for by the public – which I don’t think anybody would.
Just you watch what people will say about it.
Yes, in this case the machines are donated — but the administration of the program is entirely through a public entity. If a school district purchased its own washing machines for this use — it would quickly pay off based on fewer absences, after all — wouldn’t you call that a mild and benign form of socialism?
“wouldn’t you call that a mild and benign form of socialism”
Letting kids wash their clothes needs “administration?” Only in the rarefied atmosphere of public education.
Seriously, though, I assumed oversight by grown-ups was being done as a sort of pro bono effort by the schools to get kids to attend. Also, public schools have been interested in pupil hygiene forever, so no I can’t see anybody getting up on a high horse about this.
Still, the Wordsmith got his panties in a knot over some kids’ use of the word “politburo” as a way to feign outrage over the commie teachers, so…the age of red-baiting isn’t over.
“Red-baiting”? “RED-BAITING”? You liberals!
Determining eligibility and providing detergent are two ways that it would require administration. But to hell with all that; I’m glad that we can agree that this is a really good, inspired, and unexpectedly consequential idea. (If you do agree, of course.)
So now, HUD of all agencies, is in the Stadium – Financing business !
http://www.capoliticalreview.com/capoliticalnewsandviews/l-a-asks-hud-to-back-private-sports-complex-for-billionaires/
How long before this (if not already ! ) becomes yet another Pringle spigot ???
Egads. You and I may not agree on Section 108, BBox, but we sure do agree on this abuse of it!
Can someone explain to me why The Liberal OC is encouraging a local business interest to donate $50,000 to the Orange County Republican Party?
It seems that Patrick Strader, associated with FivePoint, has given $50,000 to the DPOC. Dan C worries that he may get into trouble with the OCGOP, and writes:
“This is a problem Strader can easily solve by hedging his bets and cutting an equally large check for the party formally known as the Republicans.”
Can someone who plans to attend tonight’s DPOC Truman dinner ask Dan why he is encouraging a wealthy donor to give $50K to the local Republicans? Did Cunningham put him up to this? Or is this just the sort of calamity that happens when Dan decides to try his hand at generating humor? I am in trial prep, so I don’t have time to think about this. Gee, I hope that Dan is OK….
P.S.: Presumably they’re not giving money to the dams so that they can go after Christine Shea, since she’s FOR the “land swap” FivePoint wants for the Vets Cemetery. Maybe it’s for Sean Panahi in his fight against Steven Choi! Boy, I sure hope so!
Some people should avoid humor. They just suck at it.
But then there’s unintentional humor. From the same pile:
“And while $50,000 is generous, it’s not nearly enough for California Democrats to grant Strader’s firm a quid, a pro or a quo.”
Haha! $4000 bucks from Gafcon was enough to provoke California Democrats to stick their noses in the Great Park scandal with a completely unnecessary “audit” of the original audit.
You’re right. Remember what happened on that one holiday weekend when both Dan and Matt tried their hand at humor…
http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2013/12/chmielewki-and-cunningham-have-a-bit-of-fun-at-the-expense-of-anaheim-and-humanity/
I think you just sort of need to have a good heart to do it right. A mean streak alone doesn’t do the trick.
Wordsmith will say anything for a ten spot. Lil’ Clumski is a sycophant to the rich – no matter how they got that way.
These are not character traits associated with humor.
Well, this seems like deja vu. I don’t keep track of when the Truman Dinner is, haven’t bothered to go since 2010. But this is the second or maybe third year in a row that the Pharisee texts me from there – to him it’s a big status thing.
Dan: Aren’t you at the Truman Dinner?
Dan: Greg?
Vern: Huh? I never said I was going to that. Read your damn blog comments. (http://www.theliberaloc.com/2016/08/26/brandman-secures-oc-labor-fed-endorsement-for-anaheim-city-council-district-3/comment-page-1/#comment-257591) Aren’t you going?
Vern: I did ask you to thank everyone for their votes. It’s a new age!
Vern: We’ll try to be there next year.
Dan: I’m here.
Dan: I HAVE A TABLE.
Vern: Groovy. Please thank everyone. We are cozy at home, studying our precinct map. I didn’t even know that thing was tonight.
Dan: Seriously. You didn’t know. Loser
Vern: Fuck you. I’ve been busy.
Dan: Sure you have.
Dan: We’re being acknowledged for 10 years of the blog.
Vern: I did hear that they are going to honor Henry, and he was one of the very few people who didn’t want to endorse Donna. Please thank the other 92% of the Party. Have fun now, and don’t text me any more.
Dan: Goodnight Vern.
Donna (on my phone): This is Donna. I just picked up Nipples Nelson’s phone. I work three 12-hour shifts of the weekends. I knew about it but I’m glad to be home eating the tortas that Yesenia made me for dinner. 🙂
Why don’t you block him from your phone? There is no need to indulge him by granting the access to you that you’d give to people who aren’t completely twisted.
Honestly, can you imagine having that mind, looking out at the world through those eyes? It must be horrific. The funniest thing is that he feels entitled to denigrate Trump — as you and I do — but there’s no mind in our county party closer to Trump’s own than his. Maybe he thinks that if he complains loudly enough about Trump no one will notice the similarity.
Note: one of the demiurges there will now likely throw back the same complaint against me — but I’ll bet that they won’t have the guts to use their real name!
Jeez, guys, I can’t use my real name due to the necessity of maintaining employment. RE the so-called Liberal OC- and Chuy- chumbley- I hope he has no real- formal- relationship with the Democratic Party since his posts and personal attacks are truly unconscionable. I thought his blog was a caricature put up by a Republican until I got his history with Art-the Chameleon- Pedroza and realized Chumps was having difficulty with trust issues.
Foe WOT- Tangled Web We Weave Dept.-
Another Encore Aria from James Cromey in the works ? Perhaps not.
Like the infomercial, “Wait ! there’s more ! “, unlike it, you’re not going to believe this—–
Sad news of the untimely demise of Tim, turkey- in-residence at Orange High’s agricultural program, after euthanasia following alleged abuse by two Chapman University students.
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/turkey-727681-chest-bird.html
A celebration of Tim’s life will be held at the school’s cafeteria, following a 4-hour viewing through its oven window (at 375 deg). In lieu of flowers, donations of condiments, complementary side dishes, or desserts are suggested. Bring your own tribute poems, and silverware.
Dude! That is so ………. so …………. funny!! I understand that the cost of the services are being partially underwritten by Butterball.