.
.
.
.
.
The OC Weekly is reporting that “Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas and his assistants will end their public silence on Wednesday about the controversial release of Todd Spitzer as a prosecutor.”
Rackauckas’ dreadful right hand, Susan Kang-Schroeder, has apparently been working overtime. Check out this laundry list of B.S. she will be unleashing on Spitzer this Wednesday:
–Did Spitzer call the public guardian, use his “assistant district attorney” title, and request confidential information?
–Did Spitzer ever lie to the news media about what happened when a senior DA official disciplined him for giving a bottle of wine to a court clerk?
–Did Spitzer try to help a friend set up a business to use victims of crimes for profit through improper referrals from the DA’s office?
–Did Spitzer ever use DA staff and equipment to campaign for the 2014 race for DA?
–Did Spitzer reveal the existence of a confidential investigation at a Republican Party meeting after being specifically told not to do so?
–Was Spitzer ever rejected by the Orange County Sheriff’s Department to be a level one reserve deputy?
–Did Spitzer ever take a stress leave from the DA’s office?
and
–Did Spitzer fail to pass a psychological examinations for any law enforcement agency?
Spitzer has already responded, in a comment posted after the article:
The Schroeder’s tried this same allegation about a stress leave in 2005 when I was going to run against Rackauckas. I opened up my personnel file to Moxley then and what? Nothing.
Ask yourself this. If the DA’s office believed I had a stress leave, didn’t they need to report it to LAPD where I was a cop at the time working patrol with a gun, badge, baton, pepper spray, shotgun, and handcuffs issued to me?
Why did the DA’s Office bring me back in 2008 if any of these allegations had any merit?
Ask yourself this: why did the DA’s office write me a letter to the Sheriff’s Department in SUPPORT of my CONCEALED GUN PERMIT in April 2009 if Rackauckas had concerns about my ability to handle stress? Why didn’t they write a letter asking Sheriff Hutchens to revoke my permit if they had concerns about my carrying a gun?
Does anyone see any problem with liability here if any of this were true?
Believe me. I love these allegations. It proves the level of corruption these law enforcement officials are willing to go to to level their critics. The County is waking up and people are getting angry that sworn prosecutors are using the DA’s Office to advance their own political corruption.
Remember, people know this is more than just about me. You have hurt too many good people. Your tactics are proving to the community exactly who you are, what you stand for, and what means you will use to achieve your objectives.
You didn’t say anything negative about me until after the March 12, 2010 filing period to run against Rackauckas closed. Then, suddenly, you had all these concerns.
Keep it up. You only give me more opportunities to expose how awful you really are. But then again, we all know it, the staff in the DA’s Office knows it and the press and the Board of Supervisors knows it.
No one respects either of you. You rule through fear; that never lasts too long. There is already an internal rebellion from within the DA’s Office against both of you.
I don’t know about the D.A.’s office, but most other investigators, when calling another agency, always identify themselves when calling; ie “This is Deputy Jose Cuervo calling from the Public Administrators office.” Of course he used his title you idiots! If the DA is so concerned about whether or not Spitzer was campaigning on County time, he had better look at his financee’s track record of fundraising for Board of Supervisors and others while on duty, and while he’s at it, why doesn’t he look at how she got that Top Executive job after being hired as a fundraiser for the D.A., then a clerical staff followed by a large jumpt to the top over MANY qualified people in the office. I guess having the D.A. as a bed buddy has its advantage. Can’t wait to see how this unfolds and the D.A. continues to make an even bigger idiot out of himself.
Desperate OC Housewives?
Is that Susan Kang in the picture……REALLY??
If it is, the first question from any reporter should be regarding her breast implants. Seriously. Let’s put this whole thing in perspective.
You could never allow someone that vain to be in charge of defending “The People” after all thats the DA’s job……
Oh yeah she’s never tried a case……..
LOL! That’s her! And you are right. She would have no clue in the courtroom. But she apparently knows her way around nightclubs!
There’s cougars in them thar’ hills.
Tony,
We need to put Mike Duvall on this case! He’ll know what to do…
” …regarding her breast implants”
I agree with Ken. I want to know if the taxpayers paid for them! And…now for a related song.
“But she apparently knows her way around nightclubs!”
I think Commie Girl used to really dig her scene.
Why don’t (and I am not hoping they do reproduce) she and Schroeder have any kids?
Is he shooting blanks? or is it her upward mobility. Her Mom has got to be pissed, no matter what kind of Cubic Z he bought her!
Tony Raukauckas and the Schroeders are so transparent–it’s so obvious to anyone who pays attention. The Orange County DA’s office is incredibly corrupt. I hope they topple him and his two companions, especially the little bed buddy with the breast implants. Those eyes look truly dead–like a shark’s eyes just before it attacks.
I wonder how many times T-Rack tried to hit that. He seems to not be able to keep his pants on. He will probably run again in another four years to try and pressure another young associate……, by then he will be tired of his current fiance from the Public Administrator’s office (who broke up his previous marriage, and the one before that too apparently). These ex-wives will be taking a big chunk out of his retirement – he may never leave!