I met the other day with a very respected local elected official who had this to say about the “Trannies” – the followers of Assemblyman Van Tran – “they appear to be in complete and utter disarray.” That was proven true again today as the Trannies failed to rig the Orange County California Republican Assembly (CRA) endorsement for their gal Dina “Ding-Dong” Nguyen, in her pathetic campaign against the popular incumbent in the First District, Supervisor Janet Nguyen.
The first vote garnered Janet 11 votes, one shy of the number needed for an endorsement. There were several other votes. Each time the Trannies just could not gather enough votes for their candidate to prevail. Again and again they tried and each time they came up snake-eyes as Dina failed to get the endorsement, which was of course a victory for Supervisor Nguyen.
According to an inside source, at least one of the Trannies’ allies voted for Supervisor Nguyen. “Tim Whitacre and his Trannie allies looked like they were trying to herd cats, as they failed over and over to get Dina the votes she needed,” said my source.
And so the misery continues for the Trannies. Earlier this year their previous candidate, Trung “B.K.” Nguyen was forced to pull out of the race for the First District when word of his bankruptcy was leaked to the local Vietnamese press. Then their new candidate, Dina, screwed up not once but twice as she tried to file her candidate’s paperwork with the O.C. Voter Registrar’s office. She finally succeeded when Andy Quach, yet another Trannie, stepped in to fill out the forms for her. What a lame attorney Dina must be if she cannot even file basic candidate’s forms!
Congratulations Supervisor Nguyen on punking Dina and her keystone cop allies at today’s O.C. CRA endorsement meeting! I am told we will have a video recording of Dina’s failure later today or tomorrow for our readers to watch and laugh at.
Art, did Janet received cra endorsement today?
How many votes did Dina ended up with?
#1,
Neither candidate was endorsed. Supervisor Nguyen finished with the same 11 votes she started out with. I am not sure how many votes dingy Dina ended up with – but I think it was 8. There were also some abstentions.
The Trannies dominate the OC CRA units. It is a complete embarrassment that they could not rig this endorsement – and they know it.
Poor, stupid Arturo…The real story here is the meltdown of Janet Nguyen at CRA. Were you there? NO. I was. She was demanding, demeaning, prideful, arrogant – kind of exactly like you – and she couldn’t even muster the votes to get an endorsement. As the incumbent, it was hers to lose; not Dina Nguyen’s to win.
Each time Janet spoke, she showed her true colors to the members who were turned off by her. Many commented about that after the event. Tim Whitacre was the parliamentarian for the convention so he wasn’t even down in with the units. In fact, he ran a great meeting keeping us on tract in some key points and questions that were raised.
I spoke with Tim about the vote. He told me he was a “No endorsement” vote because he thought Janet had not earned it and Dina was too new to CRA. He said he was displeased with Janet’s crass attacks as each vote was taken. I agreed with him. Just like central committee last month, Janet turned off people who had previously supported her. After this second performance, I am now going to do all I can to help Dina get elected. She was kind, lady-like and unlike Janet, has 18 years experience in the same job as an attorney. Dina was obviously nervous her first time in front of a big Republican crowd (about 200) and while she could have done better, she didn’t hurt herself the way Janet did.
I know you least of all care about facts and truth when it’s about someone you don’t like, but you just got the truth about what took place earlier today. The way it looks, Janet is going to lose her seat in June. I’ll be glad when that happens, she was absolutely a witch today.
Dina Nguyen was deservedly the winner today. She was the only candidate who stopped an incumbent from getting endorsed. Impressive.
I attended the meeting, and I would have voted for Janet if I were in her district. She appears to be the qualified candidate, and it is unclear why Dina is running, as she doesn’t have nearly the presence, passion or ability to lead that Janet has. It’s very troubling to see the continued axe-grinding over this office. Will Republicans duke it out with each other until a Democrat wins?
#5
Please spare us your spin.
Have you heard any incumbent Supervisor could not garner enough vote for the CRA endorsement? This is the first time this happened.
If in fact, Dina Nguyen, a challenger, continued receiving more votes every time CRA voted then Janet Nguyen is really in trouble.
Congratulations to Arturo to be a spin doctor of the year.
#6,
Yes, it is shameful that these Trannies have taken over so many CRA units and cost a great incumbent the endorsement…but that said, it is amazing that with all their shenanigans they STILL blew the CRA endorsement for “Ding-Dong” Dina.
A few months from now Dina will be just like Trung. Another Trannie who got spanked by Janet…
#3 Smells pretty snarky. Pretty light on the details and heavy on the innuendo. Looks like a standard political attack motivated by envy and fear.
What in the world did Janet ever do to you? She eat the last cookie in the box, or something?
She’s done a very good job for the Republican party. Why all the attacks from within?
We need to get rid of all cra units together. I think it was a total set up because Janet was the only incumbent who didn’t received the automatic, customary endorsement with respect. While Janet was pleading for more votes somone said in the back “Janet is nasty!”. Craig Alexander,Scott Voigts and Karl Heft were just kept smiling and there was absoluety no public control.
In mean time Janet was reminding the crowd that her opponent Dina, did not have any real leadership experiences and insisted Janet was an incumbent leader who has been a long time active cra member. Then, only to find out not one person (from voting participants) supported her plea as these paid delegates turned in their third ballots. Instead, questionably Dina gained one more vote( this was old lady Peggy Mew’s inside job— she was in charge of counting the ballots from the box). The cra endorsement convention was a total sham orchestrated by the 3 gangs from OC cra organizations Craig, Scott and Karl, all working for Dina. As Art said these 3 paid gangs are working for Dina’s campaign.
The “friends of Janet” will expel Mike Spence and Peggy Mew along with OC 3 cra gangs soon. If Janet wins her re election bid she will DESTROY her enemies with fire and some. Be careful hopless cra units because Mighty Janet will take care all of you after November.
That group looks like a bunch of spoiled brat ex Advanced Placement students who are better at backstabbing and cheating than they are at learning how to cooperate and build something positive for their community.
The CRA delegates had to pay $10.00 for registration. So they were not paid delegetes. Get your facts straight before you post on this blog.
Jannet’s biggest complaint was the County of Orange should not be in the printing business and it took her 4 weeks to get her business cards. Either Janet is pro union and wants to sends the print jobs to union shops or she doesn’t comprehend the true issues in the 1st District or for that matter the County.
Seems to me the “Trannies” were trying to keep Janet from being endorsed at the CRA not trying to get Dina endorsed.
You make the call.
Poster #9 says, “Then, only to find out not one person (from voting participants) supported her plea as these paid delegates turned in their third ballots. Instead, questionably Dina gained one more vote( this was old lady Peggy Mew’s inside job— she was in charge of counting the ballots from the box).” – what a crock of total lies and BS!!!
1st, Janet didn’t “plea”, she out right demanded that we support her and she stated Dina’s candidacy was nothing more than a smear campaign against her. Poster #3 was right about Janet’s arrogant attitude. She wanted us to “get this over with so we can all go to lunch.”
2nd, We weren’t “paid delegates”, each unit could have up to 5 delegates who to pay $10.00 each to cover the costs of the convention.
3rd, You totally lie and are the one filled with BS when you said Peggy Mew was in charge of the ballot box. Peggy was on the opposite side of the room the whole time. There were 3 neutral observers at the ballot box and any candidate or units voting had the right to question any vote total at anytime.
4th, Dina didn’t “questionably gain one more vote”, the first two rounds were 11 votes for Janet, 7 votes for Dina, 2- No Endorsement, 0 Abstain. The last round was Janet – 11, Dina – 8, No Endorsement – 1. Obviously one of the “No Endorsement” votes went to Dina. Janet needed 13 votes to win the endorsement. Her attitude and demeanor cost her any chance of winning the endorsement, not any “Trannie conspiricy.”
Lastly, the CRA endorsement convention was run by the book. Karl, Craig and Scott did a great job organizing it and Tim kept it fair and free of bias.In fact, the only problems that were encountered didn’t even concern the 1st Supervisor’s seat. I for one was impressed to see how smoothly things went. The county GOP should run their voting the same way by ballots when it comes to endorsements and propositions.
#12, “…how smoothly things went”
What are you talking about here? A fellow cra member who happens to be an incumbent couldn’t muster enough votes from her own group! Janet was totally shaken by this betrayal.
We believe Janet was singled out by this ugly cra organization.
If anyone has video footage of the CRA endorsement event, please post the video for all to view.
#9, #10, face the reality. Janet was the #1 loser coming out of this cra endorsement convention. I am afraid she needs to start looking for a waitress job soon.
Tim Whitacre is the rising star in GOP community and the members from the “Loser’s Association” are getting upset over his popularity.