A Rush to judgment
I had a long conversation this evening with Tim Rush and shortly after our phone call ended, I logged onto this blog and noted that my co-blogger, Claudio Gallegos, had beat me to the punch, in addressing the Times article about Rush that has become the talk of Santa Ana. There is far more to this story than the Times reporter, Jennifer Delson, and Gallegos alluded to in their respective takes, so here is the rest of the story.
To understand Rush you have to know the whole story. He has spent a dozen years making up for a mistake that cost him dearly. Like Ted Moreno, the Santa Ana City Councilmember who was caught up in a sting, Rush ended up in prison, for a brief time, after being charged with embezzlement. Rush paid dearly for his mistake. He lost his real estate license, his wife, and his standing in the community. He went bankrupt as well – but he never gave up. He served his time and then his friends stepped up and helped him get back on his feet.
For Rush, the simple act of buying a home was a milestone – it symbolized the progress he has made in his life. However, Rush quickly found that there was no parking available in his new neighborhood, Wilshire Square. He asked his neighbors what the deal was and eventually he found that one of them was selling cars and parking them all over the neighborhood while waiting to sell them. As Delson reported, that miscreant finally got caught, thanks to Rush. Now there is more parking for everyone – even those who do not understand Rush.
There are in fact a great many people who misunderstand him. One of them, Sean Mill, has in fact attacked him repeatedly – on the Santa Ana Citizens Yahoogroup, in the blogosphere, and even by calling his current boss and trying to get him fired. The attacks are not fair. Rush paid his debt to society. He has been an upstanding citizen throughout the last dozen years. He has been honored by neighborhood associations and other civic groups. And now he even owns a home again, with the help of a good friend, and he is on the verge of regaining his real estate license. Mill does not appreciate any of that – he is an old friend of Moreno, whom Rush opposed, and is fixated to this day on revenge.
Rush on the other hand just wants to enjoy his home and his neighborhood. He never wanted to be the story, but the Delson article has changed that in a big way. He has told his story on the John and Ken Show, on KFI AM radio, and on Bill Handel’s show, on the same station. Tammy Bruce called him recently and he will be doing her radio show too. He has a story to tell and while his enemies call his complaints petty, the fact is anyone might be annoyed by these examples, as cited in the Delson article:
- Rush called about four inoperable vehicles in a backyard abutting his yard.
- Rush objected to graffiti on the walls of a garage that he could see from his back porch.
- He called animal control officials more than a dozen times about a barking dog.
- He told code enforcement officials that a neighbor had illegally built a driveway in the front yard.
- More than two dozen times, he reported to police loud music playing at 8 a.m. on Sundays at a house three doors away.
Rush’s detractors do not address these complaints; instead they call him a racist. That is cowardly. Anyone can call someone an expletive, but it takes guts and brains to debate someone on the merits of an issue. Too many of his detractors are lacking in both qualities. The fact remains that Rush has had the brass to stand up to those who selfishly do what they want, even when they inconvenience others. I don’t think that makes him a racist.
What about his Latino neighbors? One of them told Delson that Rush “wants to change Santa Ana. He bought a house here. That doesn’t give him the right to boss people around and tell them how to live.” That may be true, but his neighbors likewise do not have the right to conduct illegal businesses out of their houses; tag their properties with graffiti; maintain ill-tempered dogs that bark at all hours; play loud music all night long, etc. Until they learn to live like civilized people, Rush will keep calling City Hall.
In a kinder, simpler world these folks would get together and work out their differences. But Delson writes that they even question Rush’s right to fly the American flag over his house – and that just isn’t right. The last time I looked, Santa Ana was part of the United States, and that is our flag. It is a symbol of the freedom that has made our nation a dominant force in the world. It is also a reminder that freedom is not free. Thousands of our fellow Americans have given their lives so that we may live freely. Living freely however does not give us the right to abuse our neighbors’ well-being.
There are some who are trying to portray this issue along political lines. Rush is a Republican, but I did not even know that. I had to ask him what party he belongs to. What he is doing is not a part of a GOP agenda. He is just trying to enjoy his home and his neighborhood. His neighbors may not appreciate that, but many of them left other countries to come here. They left to find opportunity, but also to enjoy the quality of life that is afforded to us here in the U.S. So why sully our country by breaking our laws and acting like anti-social slobs?
What Rush is doing may seem over the top, but until we live in his shoes, we cannot and should not reach that conclusion. He readily admits his mistakes, but now he is just trying to enjoy his hard fought recovery. I hope he finds a measure of peace. And I would ask his detractors to refrain from casting stones upon him. Instead, go to his neighborhood and see for yourself.
Too many homes are dangerously overcrowded and barking pit bulls and blaring music keeps everyone up at night. It is no way to live, but Rush is making the best of it. He has already been to the bottom – and I know he won’t stop until he gets to the top again. You have to admire that. It is quintisentially American to persevere against all odds. In fact I told Rush tonight that his story sounded like a movie plot. I won’t be surprised if this tale ends up on the big screen.
I hope Rush does not take umbrage at me for sharing his story with my readers. Mill has outed him for scurrilous reasons. I, on the other hand, feel that it is worth noting that Rush is himself imperfect – but he is trying to live a good life now. His motivation is the greater good, while Mill is moved by hatred and revenge. I suppose Hollywood will like that. You can’t sell a movie if it doesn’t have a good villain…
“that’s why I’m more inclined to believe Mr. Rush’s motives are not as pure as he professes them to be.”
You are free to believe what you want to believe, but from what I read Rush wants enforcement of existing law. Rather than simply calling people racists, why don’t you draw up a list of laws you want to repeal and put the list up for a vote in Orange County?
Post 2:52 , I have no quarrel with enforcing current law . I never said otherwise . I am not calling anybody racist either. Read what I said carefully . I am not going to bite on your hook . Art Lomeli
Why are regulations and enforcement seen as racist? I work for the community development dept for a small city in southeast l.a. county. The residents are 90% Latino. The City Council is 100% Latino. The staff is 75% Latino. Yet our code calls out for things like a 42 inch height limit for front yard fencing, no tarps covering front driveways, no concrete in the front yard aside from the narrow driveway to a garage, no chain link fencing anywhere, and “neutral” exterior stucco and paint colors. Our enforcement is very aggressive, and guess what…it’s accepted by most. Code enforcement is notified about the vast majority of violations by the residents themselves. Latinos.
“Why are regulations and enforcement seen as racist?”
They’re not–by most people–but it’s easier to gain political power by intimidating people with trash talk than by actually solving a problem.
anon poster at 2:52 pm wants to spin the story by crying racist. I agree with Mr. Lomeli, not biting.
This is what you call spin control. Apparently this story is not going away and people are getting nervous. If Mr. Rush is renting to a tenant, for personal profit and the owner/Mulhearn is a.) not aware of this back door deal and b) owner is not in compliance with city ordinance requiring a business license, then Rush might be in trouble with his employer.
I think this story is more of a class issue, but that’s another debate this crowd is not prepared to discuss. That would require, as Kris Day said, “negotiating the priorities of people who come from different places.”
I haven’t read anything on this blog saying regulations and enforcement of being racist. I have read individuals accused of racism independent of code enforcement issues. The argument is that code enforcement is a strategy by individuals to limit the numbers of Mexicans in the city . In this strategy regulations and their enforcement is used to marginilize , stigmitize and selectively enforce regulations beign broken largely as consequences of their limited economic resources. Code enforcement applied as a tool in this manner hopefully will result in eliminating significant numbers of Mexicans and replacing them with non Mexican immigrant recruites . An added feature of this strategy is homes would sell cheap to the new residents. Art Lomeli
“The argument is that code enforcement is a strategy by individuals to limit the numbers of Mexicans in the city.”
An argument which, so far, appears based on nothing but your own personal fevered belief system. But I don’t live in Santa Ana, so go ahead and quash this horrible enforcement campaign. Make your city safe for illegal used car lots and barking dogs and your own “recruites”!
I do not reside in Santa Ana, however poster Lomeli’s point of code enforcement, as a strategy to rid the city of Mexicans, is a real possibility. I mean, federal law is clear regarding racial enthic basis in mortgage market, but apparently it is thriving. And poster at 6:27 pm claims Mr. Lomeli’s assestment is unfounded. I think Mr. Lomeli is damn warm in his clear understanding of the matter.
Read on …
NATION’S HOUSING
Investigation uncovers racial, ethnic bias in mortgage market
By Kenneth R. Harney
Washington Post Writers Group
June 18, 2006
WASHINGTON
Post 6:27 , this argument is not based on my own feverd belief system. This strategy was brainstormed by a group of neighborhood association activists. Art Lomeli
“Code enforcement applied as a tool in this manner hopefully will result in eliminating significant numbers of Mexicans and replacing them with non Mexican immigrant recruites.”
If you are saying this strategy of forcing Mexicans out of their homes is taking place, you should take your evidence right away to the proper authorities.
Luis said…
Thomas,
I think you are confusing me with another post. I have never stated we should deny Tim the services of the city. Check the post.
============================
I owe Luis an apology.
I made a mistake and you are right.
You never said that and I mistakenly said you did.
Thomas
It seems to me that people are threatend by trying to get their share of a shrinking pie. As more latinos receive undergraduate and graduate degrees, earn higher wages, purchase homes and are getting high paying jobs despite removal of Affirmative Action programs, other groups of people can’t handle it.
Whether or not Mr. Rush is a racist doesn’t seem to me to be the issue. I believe all he wants is everyone else to follow the rules. He is a convicted felon who wants everyone else to share in his misery.
Thank God his dirty laundry has been aired and hopefully he’ll never run for office.
Can a convicted felon run for political office?
Bruce Mulhearn I’m sure knows everything about Tim’s past. Mr Mulhearn is the scum of the earth. He’s a cheat and a LIAR. His license has been suspended on two occassions and is facing further review by The California Board of Real Estate. This guy doesnt not deserve to provide a service to the public for his fraudulent activities and misleading business practices. He has taken advantage of the elderly and handicape children and other hard working people.