.
.
.
BOILERPLATE FOR OJB’S BALLOT COUNT UPDATES
-
Links to Prior Posts and Amazing Analysis
-
Resources
-
Announcements of Already Settled Matters
-
Update of Registrar’s “What’s Left to Count“
-
The Thing Itself
1. PRIOR POSTS
- Vern’s Election-of-our-Lifetime Liveblog. Tuesday – watching Thurmond, Porter, and Cisneros SURGE!
- (11/12) CA-45: KATIE BAR THE DOOR! Porter UP by 261; no looking back!
- (11/14) UPDATED: Cisneros? Umberg? Aitken? Tinajero? Castellano? J-Low?
- (11/15) The Epic of Gil, the Ascendance of Aitken, and Other Blue-Surge-Soggy Sagas
- (11/16) Surgency of OC’s Blue Surge Surges with Less Urgency
- YOU ARE HERE ==> BALLOT UPDATE: “Saturday Night’s Alright for Countin'”
2. Resources
- OC Registrar of Voters Office’s Results
- OC Registrar of Voters “What’s Left to Count”
- What Gets Counted Last?
- Cumulative Results (e.g., for Run #21) for Each Race
- Cumulative Results for Each Race in Each District
- Cumulative Results for Each Race in Each Precinct
- To-Date Turnout for Each Precinct
- Some Fantastic Maps, Currently Not Quite Working
- LA Registrar of Voters Office’s Results
- Secretary of State’s Site (to find San Diego/San Berdoo #s)
- Wonderful Maps
- Statewide Races (Executive Offices and Supreme Court)
- District Races (Congress, State Senate, Assembly, BOE Appellate Court)
- Ballot Measures
3. Announcements, Including What Racwa We’re No Longer Covering
- All of OC’s Congressional Seats have gone to Democrats.
- Only two State Legislative districts — SD-34 (Nguyen-Umberg) and AD-72 (Diep- Josh Lowenthal) appear to be unresolved. We’ve stopped daily coverage of the rest.
- Dems win SD-32; Reeps (very likely) win SD-36.
- Republicans retain AD-55, AD-68, AD-73.
- Democrats retain AD-65, AD-69 and pick up AD-74.
- The canvas of votes can go on for 30 days. Be patient.
- There are differences in supporters of the major parties that lead to races starting out favoring Republicans and then over time moving in the direction of Democrats. That repeated patterns, stable over many years, is not sinister.
- Republicans tend to make up their minds about races earlier, have more stable residency, and face fewer barriers to voting, all of which mean that they tend to vote by mail and get counted earlier.
- Democrats have less party control and less deference to party, so they tend to agonize more over each race; they are also more likely to find themselves unregistered due to residence changes, all of which means that they tend to vote through means that are counted later.
4. What’s Left to Count? (These are mostly estimates)
Absentee ballots that came in early enough, ballots cast early in voting centers and at the ROV, and most in-precinct voting machine ballots were counted and reported by the end of election day.
Of the 471,011 total ballots that were left to count, 333,155 have been and 137,856 haven’t.
- Of the 120,800 earlier vote-by-mail ballots that were left to count, 115,710 have been and 5,090 haven’t.
- Of the (estimated) 130,000 provisional ballots that were left to count, 19,928 have been counted and 110,072 haven’t. (Some provisionals won’t be counted at all, because the voter’s eligibility to vote will not have been established.)
- Of the 187,800 vote-by-mail ballots returned at the polls that were left to count, 187,526 have been counted and 274 haven’t.
- Of the 13,200 election day paper ballots that were left to count, 11,696 have been counted and 1,504 haven’t.
- Of the 20,947 eligible vote-by-mail ballots received after Election Day that were left to count, 20,502 have been counted at 445 have not.
- Of the 3,264 requiring Conditional Voter Registrations that had been left to count, none have been counted.
5. Today’s News
(Keep this most recent post available to see how things have changed.)
Here are the stats as of today:
You’ll see why that one number is boldfaced in pink pretty soon.
(A) SD-34
Here’s the OC portion of the race:
|
So Umberg’s deficit in OC went from 4,378 to 3,709 — a gain for him of 669 votes out of 6,619 counted. If he keeps on gaining 1 vote for every 10 votes counted, then if all outstanding votes are counted (they won’t be) and if the ballots don’t become more favorable to him from this point on (they will be), he could expect about 21.4% of the outstanding 137,856 to be counted. That would be about 29,500 votes, or an expected gain of 2,950 — about 750 less than he needs.
Luckily for him, part of the district is in LA. Unluckily for him, they don’t report until next Tuesday. LA has counted 28,010 votes and he has a 9% lead among them. So, to get 750 more votes, as things stand he’d need to see about 11 x 750 — that is, 8,250 — votes counted. That seems like more votes than are likely to be out there.
But don’t despair, Umberg fans! I’ve made a lot of assumptions about things continuing as a linear extrapolation of what’s come before, and the odds that they’ll be off to some substantial degree are pretty good. We just don’t know how much and in what direction. If my hunch yesterday that the Republican Party representatives are unreasonably refusing to concede signature matches in a high proportion of the provisional ballots in this race, then Umberg’s figures will go up more sharply. So if I’m projecting that he’d finish about 100-200 votes short, that message is “don’t get your hopes up too high” rather than to abandon them altogether.
(B) AD-72
Here’s where things stand in this race:
|
J-Low’s deficit went down from 6,615 to 6,089 — a gain of 526 votes — which is obviously not enough to put him on track to win in less than three weeks of counting. Only about 14.82% of the county’s ballots thus far have come out of this district, so with 137,856 supposedly still to be counted, that’s about 20,433 one could expect to be counted here (based on the assumptions that are both unrealistic and probably the best we have.) He’d need to outpoll Diep by 13,261 to 7,172 in order to win — that means receiving 64.6% of the vote — and that’s just not going to happen: he only got 52.25% of the added vote today. The hope for him is the same as the hope for Umberg — though probably more so: he has to hope that they have been challenging provisional ballots likely to favor him to an insane degree, so that provisionals yet to be approved might come in at the sort of rate he needs. It’s not impossible: just offer to help him monitor the count if you can and don’t get your hopes up too high. Catching the West OC Republicans abusing their power in counting ballots would be helpful even if he loses.
On to city races!
(C) Santa Ana Mayor
Only time here to post the results from the past two days:
CITY OF SANTA ANA Mayor |
Completed Precincts: 78 of 78 |
FRIDAY | Vote Count | Percentage |
* MIGUEL A. PULIDO | 25,132 | 50.9% |
SAL TINAJERO | 24,241 | 49.1% |
SATURDAY | Vote Count | Percentage |
* MIGUEL A. PULIDO | 23,922 | 50.9% |
SAL TINAJERO | 23,082 | 49.1% |
Yeah, we’ll have to come back to this, now that we’ve set a baseline.
(D) Anaheim Mayor
I smell a rat here — or maybe it’s just an exceptionally dirty Mouse.
Here are the raw vote totals from today — and they do not, not one bit, tell the most significant story of the race:
|
Ashleigh gained 391 votes to Harry Sidhu’s 310 — an 81-vote gain that, if repeated consistently, would allow her to make up her 544-vote deficit in about eight more days of counting.
That’s possible, but it’s not probable. So far, 7.19 percent of the OC ballots have contained a vote in the Anaheim Mayor’s race; if we go back again to the estimate of 137,856 votes still out, that would be 9,912 more votes coming to Anaheim. (Realistically, as a largely Democratic area, the likely number of votes for Anaheim would be higher and more favorable to Ashleigh than my estimates, but I like starting with straight linear projections.) Anaheim has had 11,886 votes counted in the past four days: that;s 2971.5/day, or enough for only four more days of counting.
Looking at it another way, Ashleigh has only picked up about 56 votes per every 1000 counted. So in round terms, 56*12 thousands left to count would mean that Ashleigh would be expected to pick up only 672 more votes — well short of the 1,544 she needs.
Don’t believe it. As I said, something seems to be up — and it looks like a similar thing to what’s happening in the legislative races, only easier to track.
Here are the RAW TOTALS of HOW MANY BALLOTS HAVE BEEN COUNTED in the Anaheim Mayor’s race in each of the past four days:
Wednesday: 5,768
Thursday: 2,969
Friday: 1,990
Saturday: 1,159
In other words, someone is turning off the tap of votes coming into Anaheim — enough so that the number dropped by almost 50% on Thursday, then by a third of that on Friday, and then by 45% of that on Saturday.
Why would that be happening? Well, the most obvious answer, yet again, is that as we’ve moved into counting provisionals, fewer are getting processed — because an objection to the signature match can be enough to freeze them. (This also puts a burden upon the ROV’s office to contact voters who had mismatches — and upon voters to show up to claim their ballots within a limited time period.) And if provisionals are more likely to favor Ashleigh, that would mean that once they are counted she’ll likely be doing far better than picking up only 56 votes per thousand ballots counted.
So this suggests a hypothesis: let’s see which of the three districts in Anaheim with elections on the ballot have the biggest drop in numbers per day. As I write this, I haven’t yet done the analysis, so I’ll literally going to do it now.
[Hold music plays.]
OK, I’ve only looked at the changes for one day (Saturday) so far, but it looks like District 2 had about 50 more ballots than District 6 and District 3, which were about tied. I’ll have to look at more days before I can come to even a tentative conclusion, but let me pose a question for now:
Granting that wealthy District 6 votes at a far higher rate than does impoverished District 3, would you really expect District 6 to have as many provisional ballots by the eighth day of counting as you’d expect from District 3? Or does it seem that perhaps a whole bunch of ballots favoring Ashleigh could be sitting unopened?
Provisionals, folks, I gotta tell you — they’re just ripe for mischief!
Is it possible for forces to slow down the process so much that these provisionals never get counted? Is it a drop-dead deadline?
Bangladesh is “impoverished.” District 3 (which I live two blocks from) isn’t.
Really? I think of poverty as (1) being mostly relative to one’s peers and (2) not necessarily involving starvation and dying in the street from preventable illnesses. That seems to be the term is used outside of Zengerstan: the federal poverty line in California is $12,140, which would provide a pretty nice standard of living in Dhaka,
Yes, I know, your transparent liberal narrative is to make every minority desperately feeble and in need of your ever-so-helpful attention.
You’re so full of bullshit it’s hard to know whether to laugh or cry.
You couldn’t afford to buy a house in Anaheim’s 3rd District. Help yourself first.
Wow, this sounds like channeling Chumley’s arguments.
On a related note, it is stunning the GOP loss at the congressional level here in OC.
Why yes, I did call the Third District “impoverished,” because of what I understand to be its relatively high poverty rate compared to most of the rest of the city and county. It’s much like how I’d call your comment here “crackpot,” not because you’re completely psychotic, but just because you’re veering off into petty, nasty, unseemly nonsense.
It’s true that NOT putting oneself entirely first is a relatively liberal stance, although some conservatives do manage it as well.
Wait! I thought D3 included the “wealthy white enclave of The Colony” so which is it?
*Whatever happens…it has already been “An Historic Election for the OC”
Monumental in the extreme. If the Dems pay attention they could be in for 20 years!
“If the Dems pay attention they could be in for 20 years!”….the first test is the candidate for OC Supervisor to replace Todd Spitzer….Dems should not, must not put forth any “has been” from Beth Krom to Joe Dunn…it’s time for a superbly qualified candidate from outside the Dem pipeline…maybe Laura
Oatman, Michael Cottick, Sal Tinajero,…. just throwing these out there….
Oatman, Tinajero, Dunn not in the district. Not sure who Cottick is…
Andy Thorburn of Villa Park, the biggest Democratic competitor to Gil Cisneros in the CA-39 primary, has announced plans to run — and is certainly no “has-been.” Beth Krom was of course the #2 person on Agran’s team — which has recently shown a marked inability to elect anyone. (They may lay claim to Farrah Khan, but they didn’t elect her; she did the heavy lifting herself.) On the GOP side, there’s Irvine Mayor Don Wagner and termed-out Anaheim Councilwoman (and Disney tool par excellence) Kris Murray. Neither party wants more than two candidates in this “plurality wins” race, so I think that it will be one of those four. (If Tom Tait wanted it, it would be his.)
*Yeah, Joe Dunn actually like to accomplish something. Joe will not be running for anything anytime soon in our opinion. We love Joe Dunn.
Whoever runs for the Toddy Boy seat needs to have a suitable answer to the
Homeless issue. 2ndly, they should not be in favor of Toll Roads on the 405
or 5.
That’s the spirit!