.
.
.
Since only Lorri Galloway and I know for sure – since only she and I CAN know for sure – that her allegations against me are completely false and nothing like what she describes ever happened, let me just start with a list of undeniable facts that should make any reasonable person doubt her story:
- First off as many have mentioned, Lorri is and was a MANDATED REPORTER. She runs a freaking BATTERED WOMEN’S SHELTER for Chrissakes. It’s called the ELI HOME and ESCRI, and features a thrift store which provides much of its income. Throughout 2012-13 – that is, FOR A LONG TIME after “5 years ago” (i.e. 2012) I spent a lot of time there. UNSUPERVISED. Sometimes I was writing stories, sometimes just killing time and talking to people. Yes, me, the supposed rapist.
- According to Lorri, this alleged assault occurred sometime in 2012 – “5 years ago.” It’s true that I didn’t have a car at that time, and whenever there was a political event she wanted me to cover, or I needed to get back from, or she just wanted to talk my ear off about Anaheim, she would give me a ride in her little red sports car. AND SHE CONTINUED TO DO THAT WELL UNTIL LATE 2013 (when we sort of parted ways over my opposition to her running against Mayor Tait.) That’s about a YEAR (depending on when in 2012 this supposedly happened.) Yes, just me and Lorri in her little car. Off the top of my head I remember her taking me to help the Perez family fight their unjust foreclosure in late 2012, and taking me to the DA’s “Victims Rally” in mid-2013, but there were many other times, as people can attest. What sort of sense does this make of her terrifying story?
- Throughout 2012-14 Joanne Sosa was Lorri’s closest friend and tireless right-hand woman. Lorri never told Joanne about this alleged assault.
- On top of that, whenever Lorri was too busy to give me a ride, she would send out the equally-frail Joanne to do it. WOW. How irresponsible of Lorri, if her story were true.
- As Eli Home workers saw and remember, during that time I frequently had one-on-one meetings with Lorri in her Eli Home office, to discuss recent and upcoming political events. With the door closed. Well up into late 2013.
- It was at this Eli Home, in April 2013, that I met my future wife Donna Acevedo, who was an Eli Home client, as well as a recently bereaved mother. I met Donna at the Eli Home’s 30-year anniversary celebration where I was playing piano at Lorri’s request. Lorri, Mayor Tait, Amin David, and many others attended. Not long after, Donna and I began seeing each other. Did Lorri utter a word of warning to her vulnerable client about what an out-of-control wannabe rapist I am? No, not a word.
- As Donna and many others remember, Lorri was nothing but friendly to me for that whole year and a half. Until of course I reacted negatively to her running against her old ally Mayor Tait in late 2013, and our friendship grew a little more distant and sporadic (though we still talked on the phone frequently.)...
I realize how hard it is to believe that Lorri Galloway would be capable of this, capable of inventing such a vicious lie against an old friend. I’m still having trouble wrapping my head around it myself. But she really did accuse me of assaulting and trying to rape her in her car five years ago. A person in my situation can only ask “Why?” And “Why me?”
I can only come up with a pair of motivations:
- to get attention, sympathy and relevance in the Mayor’s race as Ashleigh Aitken quickly picks up all the Democratic and Labor support. And…
- to punish and hopefully silence me after I wrote, once more, gently critical of her Mayoral run.
Let me back up a little…
***********
A couple months ago, while I was cleaning outside, I had a really nice 20-minute phone conversation with Lorri. It had been a while since we chatted, and we had a lot of catching up to do. She laughed a lot, said she loved me and Donna, and once again told me, “Vern, you bring so much light, love and laughter to Anaheim.”
I don’t remember if I’d called her, or she’d returned my missed call, or she called me by coincidence. Donna and I had been idly curious whether the rumors were true that she was gonna run for Mayor again. She told me she was “still thinking about it.” I’m sure I didn’t ask or urge her to, and I hope I didn’t give the impression that I thought it was a good idea or that I would support her.
Eventually a few weeks ago, she announced, sent me and Donna an invitation, we didn’t go, but I read about it on another blog. I’d had time to think about how disastrous her last, 2014, run was, how many people on all sides she had stabbed in the back, and how hard it would be for me to convince myself or anyone else to vote for her. I still thought of her as a friend, but I couldn’t see how she’d have any chance beyond bleeding some Democrat votes from Ashleigh Aitken.
So when I got around, in a much larger Anaheim piece, to a little section about how we hadn’t yet seen an Anaheim candidate for Mayor this year that we could enthusiastically support, I wrote this carefully gentle paragraph about Lorri:
Sensing some of Ashleigh’s weaknesses, out comes our old friend Lorri “LoGal” Galloway, one more time. I get very sad when I write about Lorri, who was one of my first friends in this town (when she first talked to me she scolded me “The Orange Juice is not a good OC blog because you hardly write anything about Anaheim; let me tell you about all that’s happening here” – can you imagine that? – and the rest is history.) She also did a lot of good things for my wife Donna when she needed help, and I won’t let people forget that she was a very good Councilwoman for eight years. But in 2014-15 she set a world record for burning bridges. And reading about her campaign announcement rally on another blog, she sounds like she’s trying to position herself to the RIGHT of Ashleigh. Ashleigh Lite, a LITTLE bit less scary to the resort district and police than Ashleigh is, as though that was scary.
Then I get out of a week at rehab and see this. It sure FELT like some kind of over-the-top revenge.
A friend tells me, “Lorri thinks you’re worthless now that a lot of people think you’re just a drunk in rehab. She thinks she can get away with using you to get sympathy and attention. She thinks you won’t be able to defend yourself.” We’ll see about that.
I won’t say any more for now. Some time down the road when I’m less angry and hurt, I will write the full five-year saga of my friendship with Lorri Galloway now that it’s over – trust me, it’ll be good reading! For now, I’m going to try to concentrate on other things…
Vern out.
Wait. Let me get this straight.
You sexually assault her, then she leaves you alone with abused women under her span of care and protection, and she expects to get away with it?
Wow. Not exactly leaving us with options.
She purposely and recklessly endangered vulnerable women under her care and isn’t fit to run a nonprofit let alone a city. She’s such a spineless coward that she’ll put other women at risk because she thinks you’ll sink her political career with your blog, so she does nothing?
OR
She’s a raging liar who will use anyone and anything, including vulnerable people she has helped in the past to get what she wants. She’s a sociopath who would actually plan a lie about a sexual assault to boost a political campaign.
…
Yup. Sounds like she’s a great fit for Anaheim politics.
Yup, that’s about it.
And you believe all that was written simply because this man (Vern) said so??
Anyone try talking to people who have known Lorri 3 times longer and where there during this time as well? What’s they’re version of what happened?
The same. Unless they’re family or current employees.
Before she arrived in Anaheim she left a trail of bankruptcies, ripped-off creditors and one scam victim that was her husband’s aunt. When she ran for Supervisor she faked three separate addresses in a district in which she didn’t live. The neighbors of her Anaheim Hills “shelter” claim that it’s nothing but a Potemkin set-piece.
There is a credibility problem here.
Yes, I’ll get into all that in due time.
I’ve always been a bit surprised that you guys fell for her rather transparent routine. The background stuff should have been enough. The bubble-headed teenager performances from a 60-year old should have given more than a moment’s pause.
On the other hand, I have to giver her credit for some sort of intuitive psychological genius: knowing that the people who bought into the LoGal experience would be highly defensive – even when confronted with the bald facts.
Dan C continues addressing my observations I posted on a related post :
“Ricardo, questioning the motivations of the victim here in why Galloway didn’t do more? What a jerk you are for saying that. Lorri owes Donna nothing. Perhaps she did try to warn Donna about Vern, but we don’t know the nature of their conversations years ago. You make a lot of assumptions about many things. All of them wrong. If you ever want to have an actual conversation, let me know. I think you’re a coward.”
His response was a follow up to further clarifications on his role in publicizing the alleged incident:
“Will you Dan, clarify why you advised Ms Galloway not to take Donna’s calls? Not that I know that Donna has tried to call her. Why didn’t she warn Donna and other women in the shelter about this supposedly creepy fellow? Did she continue inviting him to the premises of her organization after the alleged incident?
Apparently she disclosed this incident two years later to another blogger, but it took three or four more years to come to this point. Even your fictional commenter David Vasquez question the political motivations behind the current disclosure.
You’re right, by the low level of your posts and most commenters you allow in your blog, it is smart for Ms Galloway not to have you as her PR person. The Pringle team can afford a better one.”
In addition to doing a terrible job in spinning the allegations, Dan C once again demonstrates that the DPOC needs to seriously consider dropping him as its Communication Chair. His latest gem:
“So here’s how it stands. Vern Nelson, convicted of DUI four times and arrested for felony DUI in April 2016. His co-blogger admits lecherous behavior on his part. Divorced and re-married; agnostic.
Lorri Galloway, former Anaheim city council member, runs a nationally charity for battered women and children, happily married for years to the same man. Christian and a grandmother.”
So this is the message of this important DPOC officer: if you have a severe addiction, you are barred for life to participate in the civic affairs of society (lsn’t this a similar criteria applied by the GOP in places like Florida when Bush stole an election?)
If you are Divorced, Re-married, and Agnostic …not married, not a Christian….
Matt Cunningham must be proud again of his PR colleague .
Vern used the word “womanizer” to describe some of his behavior in the years before he married Donna; that’s as good of a word as “lech.” But for God’s sake, sake, there’s a huge difference between lechery and sexual assault! Not only is the former not illegal, but it’s not even clearly ASSOCIATED with sexual assault; Chumley’s position seems to approach one that sees rape as a crime of sexual passion rather than one of violent domination and control.
Perhaps Dan will understand if I use this analogy: just because I’ve passed along reports from my young charges in the Kamala Harris got Senate campaign of his barreling towards them, backing them against walls, and yelling at them about their not supporting Loretta Sanchez — which may or may not have constituted non-sexual assault, but nobody wanted to come back and have to see him again to test that out — doesn’t mean that such an act of physical intimidation means that he was actually aiming to commit battery! I’ve never heard of Dan ever making contact with anyone at the end of one of his bull-rush episodes, and I doubt that he ever has, because he isn’t dead or missing his teeth. What is figuratively true of Vern and his past lechery is literally true of Dan and his screaming rampages: both of them know when to stop.
Of the many things Dan C. is, he certainly is not an officer, let alone an “important . . . officer” of the DPOC.
I look forward to reading her response in the perfidious blog that, out of deep yearning, decided uncritically that she was obviously telling the truth.
Has Joanne spoken to you or others about this yet? I’d consider her a very credible source.
It’s excruciating to think that a woman would lie about something like this because of the natural inference that it casts doubt on other women’s stories. I’d warn against that. I’m not reaching any definitive conclusion as yet — sorry, but that comes with the territory of taking these sorts of accusations very seriously — but if it was made up out of whole cloth then she’d be far more outlandish than is true of a situation where there was some underlying miscommunication at the heart of the disputed.
in the meantime, I hope that others will also reserve final judgment for now, if that’s not too effortful for them. Someone’s story is bound to start seeming strained. If her position is simply that she made the allegation and so is now entitled to demand that people credit her account — well, all I can say is that that wouldn’t do well in a formal investigation (which we seem to be trying to approximate here.)
*As usual, all sexual accusations that are true….like incest, pregnancy of 11 and 12 year olds, rape by irate husbands, rape by uncles, aunts, parents, Step Parents, Abusive Foster parents and the like…seem to get shuffled under the carpet while high profile folks just the lion share of bad press. Still remember the bad Cub Scout Leader in his late 40’s that wanted to play hide the turkey. Mom said she would kill him….but mom did have a habit of being a bit theatrical. Meanwhile, memories of playing Spin the Bottle with Annette Funicello at 12 or playing Doctor with neighbor girl in the park at 11…..are still vivid memories. Playing Strip Poker came later and we still wonder who were those folks and when that happened back in the 60’s! Luckily, we never got out much in High School when those Future Farmers had some serious relationships with their farm animals….. Anyway, unless the person doing the abusing is in a serious position of power…either much older or the boss or leader……much of what happens in our society is due to those willing to put up with the behavior. Yes, it can be a good job, a good movie role or a great future…..but if the person makes inordinate demands to keep or get those opportunities….the best case is “Turn them in….to their boss….and then quit!”
This they call in the Military: Corrective Action. It is the same advice we would give any daughter, son, nephew or niece! If a stranger attempts to abuse you – call the cops, they will not do anything….but the abuser will get the point. What do they say? An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure!
RT says; You’re right, by the low level of your posts and most commenters you allow in your blog, it is smart for Ms. Galloway not to have you as her PR person. The Pringle team can afford a better one.”
Ricardo, I love you a little more every time you write something.
So here is the issue that needs to be addressed. WITHOUT my getting into “he said, she said,” the point of Vern’s defense of himself is this; Lorri Galloway may have chosen to bury the assault she is now reporting, but her position as the Executive Director of the Eli Home does not PERMIT that option, if the individual involved has contact with her clients at the non-profit. Galloway cannot legally (or morally or ethically) invite into the shelter/non-profit space someone she reports as a sexual predator. The fragile population using the services at Eli/ESCRI have the reasonable expectation that Galloway as Exec Director provides a “duty of care” to ensure they are not knowingly exposed to predators. Having Vern at Eli events, in the store or office, and introducing him to clients comes with an inferred character reference, and an unspoken assurance by Galloway that she knows Vern and he is OK to have around. To conduct herself in this manner while believing him to be a sexual predator would appear to violate the trust that her clients are supposed to legally and socially rely upon.
None of us can possibly know what happened in that car, nor am I in a place to question someone claiming to be a victim. Nor am I “victim blaming” saying she invited unwelcome behavior by inviting the friendship and close contact. What I am considering here is Lorri’s own behavior based on Lorri’s own statements, ONLY in the context of her position as Executive Director of the Eli Home.
As an individual, Galloway was entitled to remain quiet and avoid Vern. She was entitled to remain quiet and continue a friendship with Vern, if she chose to look the other way. But as ED of a non-profit ministering to those already exposed to abuse, she was NOT in any way entitled to expose her clients to someone whose behavior she reports as predatory or abusive! Galloway’s post-2012 friendship with Vern, as a private individual, should have remained entirely outside of Eli/ESCRI once she believed him potentially aggressive. Her introduction of Vern to Donna, and watching an intimate relationship develop without warning Donna of what she claims to be Vern’s potential for aggression, would make her one of the crappiest friends on earth if Donna was only a social contact, but because Donna was a CLIENT of the ministry, Lorri’s introduction and silence as the relationship developed stepped over a line of professional conduct, especially if her funding sources require adherence to a code of conduct commonly applied to those providing health/mental health services, shelter, counseling, etc.
Thanks Cynthia for elaborating on this point : my first reaction reading about this serious accusation included the thought how Ms Galloway implemented policies to protect the population she serves.
The impact of sexual assault may take a long time to heal, as Dan C points out to me on his last reply (we are having a side conversation, in which he pretends not to read the comments here, but somebody briefs him). His reference does not take into account the specifics of this situation, and unfortunately the director of a women’s shelter can not overlook her basic responsibility towards her clients.
He is now recognizing this fact, he writes:
“I didn’t advise her; I wrote that for anyone’s consumption. Many people at the Eli Home tried to warn Donna.
You might want to educate yourself about the emotional roller coaster that sexual assault victims deal with, try this link: https://www.rapevictimadvocates.org/what-you-need-to-know/effects-of-sexual-violence/ ”
He issued an apology for related-comments on this issue :
” 29, 2017 at 4:01 pm
Quick note for readers. I’ve deleted some comments pertaining to Jose Moreno’s daughters and the late Michael Kinslow. I don’t hover over this blog or comments 24/7 so some comments were over the top and deleted. I missed them. My apologies to those who saw them and were offended. Commenters named or anonymous, I endorse free speech. ”
It is time for a new DPOC Communications Chair.
#METOO Some woman named Donna rubbed herself against my leg at a council meeting, sat down next to me and whispered in my ear, “I know where you live!” It’s a true story!
I Stand With Vern Pat Nelson,Why would Lorri Not say anything much sooner? And Not say anything to Donna,”hay Donna I got something to tell you”!
..and the way Joanne Sosa was treated By Galloway, Joanne did everything for ElI/ESCRI,Joanne Did the work,’made things happen’and Lorri took the credit
…this is a Twilight Zone episode special guest ‘character actor’ J.R.Read…and Curt Pringle playing the part of the face you never see, but you only hear the voice.
I guess this might be the right place, if there is any, to respond to Chemical Lewinsky’s latest slander-assist, at the tail end of this http://www.theliberaloc.com/2018/01/29/the-dark-side-of-julio-perez/
“… Nelson’s rebuttal [is] ‘why didn’t she tell women in Eli Home shelters about him?’ The truth is Galloway is bound by codes of silence and secrecy when it comes to those who seek safe passage from her. She can’t say anything.”
Well, first of all my rebuttal is the story above, and it was much more than “why didn’t she tell women etc.”
But does anyone else see how ass-backward imbecilic Dan’s response is?
*I* WAS NOT an Eli Home client. She was never “bound by codes of silence and secrecy” about me. And “she can’t say anything?” Really? Then what are we talking about?
When Dan “Business of Baseball” Chmielewski is the best spinner you can get, you are really taking on water. And I really need to sit down and get started on my promised Galloway series.
Oh, she’s bound by codes alright.
Just not the kind that involve ethics.
Hey, kinda like Dan!
“When Dan “Business of Baseball” Chmielewski…”
Ah, the classics never get old.
BTW, when are you going to write the Galloway Experience, now that the LoGal Kool-Aid has been properly regurgitated?
I have observed a peculiar psychological phenomenon with her (once the silly schoolboy crush on the part of non-misogynists is accounted for). People who invest in a “charitable” cause, become emotionally attached to that investment; so the blinders come on. Then the beneficiaries of charitable largesse become untouchable.
I wonder who his source was for that argument, or if he came up with it on his own.
Heh-heh-heh.
And then of course, as icing on the cupcake, Dan concludes, “Whoa to the candidates [Vern & Greg] support…”
WHOA unto them!
Little things like that make it all worthwhile.
Cunningham’s latest post blares the deceptive title “Galloway raises $117,000 for campaign” – that sounds like a lot, a sure sign of popularity!
But read on and it’s actually only 17K she raised – the rest is a 100K loan she made to herself.
It’s always been curious how gently uncritical the supposedly conservative Klepto-Scribe has been of her – one of myriad grounds for suspicion.
But beyond that, how the hell does she lend her campaign $100,000 when Eli Home workers (often) have to take turns going without a paycheck?
“It’s always been curious how gently uncritical the supposedly conservative Klepto-Scribe has been of her…”
Yeah, so long as she seems useful. But that has never worked out for the kleptos.
Obviously someone smarter than her pushed her into this pointless effort (hint, it wasn’t God) to dilute the Dem/Lib vote.
Chemical got a statement from Eli Home’s main employees that they are not going without paychecks. Maybe that is true right now, I obviously haven’t been in touch with those people since their boss declared war on me, and they gotta close ranks. But I stand by my knowledge of what happens over there when finances are tight.
The main employee who vouched, to Dan back in 2018, that Eli employees did NOT have to cast lots to see who’d get paid that week, was fired two years ago on the pretext of the pandemic, and replaced with someone who’d work cheaper.
What I wrote (somewhere) about that happening was true, as attested to by Joanne and Donna.
Hopefully the fired employee who denied it four years ago is disgruntled enough to withdraw his denial. It’s shameful that she treats her employees this way while living in luxury and re-directing nonprofit funds to her political campaigns.
SHE’S BAAAAAAACK!!!!
I spent some time initially summarizing, and the copying both the Truth Squad’s transcripts of the event and YouTube’s closed captioning; each sometimes had some material that the other one missed or got wrong:
Demagogue, grifter, right-wing populist (with the criticism of liberal elites), and hell-wraith claiming the mantle of God’s favor: in most cities, she’d be the worst candidate imaginable. Sadly, Anaheim can do even worse. But I prefer the idea of someone who even opened their mouths in opposition to the Cabal before it was quite this safe.
Well, I hope people listen to it though. The way she delivers these words is … bizarre. And a little chilling. And a little infantile.
The Princess was in rare form. High dudgeon. I don’t think she’s all there.
Have you seen this, Vern?
https://www.facebook.com/groups/255588901578893/posts/1416826398788465/?comment_id=1416834295454342
Oh THIS chestnut of a video. I thought everyone had seen that. A lawyer talking to a 2002-era Tom Daly-led council, rediscovered and posted by the Bushala-era FFFF in 2012 or 14:
Oh yeah, and the video explains the sign Bryan Kaye had which said “Family = Barbara Russell” – Barbara Russell, the aunt of Galloway’s husband Mike, whom the Galloways drove into homelessness and an early death.
It was weird that Mike was so friendly with Bryan on the video, maybe he didn’t read his sign.
This was just after Mike jostled against me from behind and said “You should get out of here, you’re lucky I haven’t beat the shit out of you yet.” I laughed and said, “Mike, that story WAS NOT TRUE.” He said, “Am I supposed to believe YOU or MY WIFE?” And I said “I guess you have to believe your wife, but I bet you have some secret doubts.” Then Bryan wandered over with his goofy grin…
I think maybe at future Galloway rallies I’ll let other “lyin’ sacks” do this without me; her false allegations against me are just a distraction and make some people think she’s a victim.
You should solicit Mike’s response to this very story.
I guess “honesty, integrity, and transparency” were demonstrated back when Lorri G pretended to reside in a downtown Anaheim in order to run for offfice.
Sure fooled Dan C.
No, thanks!
And yet right around the same time he was Steven Choi’s worst nightmare for doing the same thing. God save us all from such double standards!
She faked THREE different addresses. The last one was actually zoned for residential use. You couldn’t make this stuff up.
Today the Drunk Blogger posted what he calls “Remark’s [sic] from Lorri Galloway Kickoff.” https://theliberaloc.com/2022/06/18/remarks-from-lorri-galloway-kickoff/ That deserves an extra [sic]. I was surprised that any friend of Lorri would want to reprint the speech she made at her June 9 kickoff, which you can see a little above this comment, on video and transcribed by Greg. But what Dan printed was something totally different, and I’m assuming it was the speech she had prepared, but chucked out when she saw protesters, got upset, and decided to improvise.
Did Dan not know that what he printed was NOT her “remark’s” June 9? Did he not see the videos? Or do she and he want people to forget that video? Her written speech is notably lacking in “LYING SACKS” or “JUST SAY NO!” to Ashleigh. It’s hard to know which speech woulda been better – the one she gave was mortifying, but this one isn’t very exciting either, and neither addresses any Anaheim issues (as she hasn’t since Sept 2013.)
There ARE lies and class envy against Ashleigh here, which she did remember to include when she spoke. “Her wealthy father helped to bankroll her multi-million dollar campaign” is a lie; Anaheim has never (yet) seen a multi-million dollar Mayoral campaign, and Ashleigh didn’t even spend ONE million. But it’s also funny because we happen to know that Lorri had been hoping to hit up Wylie for money herself before learning that his daughter was running!
Most of the (planned) speech is biographical, and it’s actually kind of interesting – I didn’t know she was an orphan at 10, or a lot of other stuff. But there are huge and provocative omissions or lacunae. She says she and Mike came to Southern California 17 years old and impoverished, and soon were so successful that they owned “a home in Anaheim Hills … a beach home overlooking the ocean in San Clemente… a bowling alley in Garden Grove… and drove a Porsche.” That’s … IMPRESSIVE… but she never says how they suddenly made all that money! A strange thing to leave out. (I’m told Mike worked as an electrician, but that doesn’t explain it.)
Then somehow they went bankrupt. I guess Lorri is putting this out pre-emptively so that nobody else brings up their bankruptcy. (Someone told me that when Sidhu was running against her in 2004 he brought up her bankruptcy as a last-minute attack ad – that fucker.) I just wish I could understand her story better. They went bankrupt because their wonderful gay friends in the “LGBT leagues” got AIDS and left town?
And then their decision to declare bankruptcy led to: “The Eli Home was founded shortly afterwards.” Weird shift to passive voice there, I thought it was actually Lorri and Mike who founded the Eli Home.
In closing we get Grandiose Lorri:
“I have lived a destined life. Everything that has happened in my life brings me to this place, this space, and this time. There is no one better than me to be the next mayor of the Great City of Anaheim. It’s now my time… “
So apparently Chumley wrote her a speech, expected her to give it, and didn’t bother to check whether she had. Echt essence of Chumley!
She and her husband defrauded his aunt in Monterey County. The old gal died before she could collect anything. Then there was a trail of bankruptcies and stiffed creditors. And then there’s the potemkin “shelter” in Anaheim Hills, the deed swapping of which is interesting reading.
This is not a nice person.
Jesus. Christ, that is. She is the Instrument of the Lord’s Will. Lucky us to be favored by such a divine messenger. Almost savior-like.
You know… “I have lived a destined life” is the kind of thing a tweeker says to themselves as they look in the mirror grinding their teeth.
Blasphemeth not, pagan. For the Lord will smite thee with furious anger. If Jesus says LoGal is Bound for Glory, who art thee to deny it?
‘Course if you think about it haven’t we all lived a “destined” life? At least in retrospect is seems that way.
Anyhoo, I guess we can agree on one thing – Loraine is a scammer whose few followers are just a little more bubbleheaded than she is.
Lori has a long history of fraud. Her daughter the previous director of the Eli home put our business lamppost pizza out of business by pocketing most of the money from ordered and stealing our kegs after hours….
…I’ve seen Lori ignore victims of violent crimes because they do not serve her agenda.
[The more lurid accusations omitted pending confirmation of this guy… which probably won’t be forthcoming, given that he used elihome.com for an email, which doesn’t exist!]