Comments on: More pictures of Loretta Sanchez and her alleged federal lobbyist boyfriend emerge

By: Truthtrumpet

Truthtrumpet — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:20:54 +0000

John Saylor, the moron in the picture with Loretta, is a known liar. He’s one of these Washington name-droppers who managed to snap a few photos with a congresswoman and then claim he had an affair. He is just like the balloon boy father or the White House gate crashers–professional attention hog.

By: A Friend

A Friend — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:34:25 +0000

Sanchez and Einwechter actuallly live together now. They are what you call “domestic partners” or something like that. The deal is sealed. I’m sure we’ll be hearing wedding bells soon.

By: anon

anon — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:32:34 +0000

Oh, and by the way, Einwechter is a lawyer, not a lobbyist. So, there is no “affair” and no conflict of interest. These are the facts. If you want to criticize Loretta, keep it focused on policy. There is nothing to criticize about her personal life.

By: anon

anon — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:26:45 +0000

Hello? Loretta is not having an “affair.” She’s been in a committed relationship with her long-time partner, Jack Einwechter, for years. There is no evidence that she has been unfaithful to Einwechter. A few innocuous photos with Saylor do not suggest otherwise.

By: Vern Nelson

Vern Nelson — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:01:32 +0000

It may be time to remind ourselves exactly what happened with DUVALL.

He didn’t get in trouble for having an affair with a lobbyist(s), as unethical as most of us here consider that behavior. He didn’t get removed or disciplined.

He had to resign because it went without saying that he could no longer represent the “family values” Party after publicly boasting in sordid detail about multiple extramarital affairs.

There are more dissimilarities than similarities with Loretta’s case, EVEN ASSUMING she’s having an affair with a lobbyist. Just saying…

By: Just in Time

Just in Time — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:47:38 +0000

Connect the dots, guys–major CONFLICT OF INTEREST

THIS POST SHOULD BE FORMATTED INTO LETTERHEAD AND MAILED OUT — MORE FOR THE ETHICS COMMITTEE.

look at Richardson— he didn’t even want to open up a can of worms as there were grey areas with contracts out of his office with L.A consultants. He gave up that nomination for Obama’s Cabinet. Now that is having some sense…

Excellent post.

Don’t let me down, DOC L. — if you intent to clean house —you have to be just and honest with yourself. Or is Santa Ana an island out here????

don’t look the other way on this one- Art jumps the gun sometimes but he’s right on target on this one, and I know he’s not going to leave Adriana and Gus unsupported on this one. Good going.

it is not easy to set it straight when it comes to
our sister here! But latinos are disenchanted with Loretta.
Border security– damn she’s lame and has the IQ of a nopal and to top it off she is ashamed of that.

We need a good Latina/o candidate ASAP!
Still evaluating Cece Iglesias- but please…- Loretta needs to become a lobbyist herself– she’ll have to wait a while after losing this coming election– but hey this will give her time to further her education, and possibly somehow – refine herself.

By: anon

anon — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:24:23 +0000

I have an idea: if you want to know if Saylor’s tall tails are true, just ask Loretta who she’s spending the holidays with. I’ll bet a c-note it’s not a Saylor, but a soldier, named Jack. Saylor was never even in the game, even though he claimed to many that he scored with the congresslady. Total nonsense. Jack is Loretta’s one real dude. They have been steady for years.

By: anon

anon — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:00:14 +0000

Saylor is a pathetic loser who has claimed to be Loretta’s lover, but is only a wannabe.He is a liar. Jack Einwechter is and always has been Loretta’s one and only.The whole Saylor fable turns out to be a red herring. Just ask Loretta. For that matter, just ask Saylor. He’s in the phonebook.

By: Sunny

Sunny — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:46:07 +0000

If these allegations were made against a republican, I would also want proof. These pictures don’t prove anything.

By: anon

anon — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:45:52 +0000

“You liberals are such a bunch of insincere phony hypocrites!”

Hate to break it to ya, but there are liberals out there (as well as conservatives) who are capable of being objective, non-kool-aid drinking observers.

But thanks for that insightful overstatement!

By: Rogue Elephant

Rogue Elephant — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:21:16 +0000

You liberals are such a bunch of insincere phony hypocrites! It’s ridiculous! If this were a Republican, you’d be wringing your hands, “It creates the appearance of corruption [gnash teeth]“.

Only now, it’s “Until you can prove it…” Hogwash! Hypocrites!

By: Sunny

Sunny — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:12:09 +0000

They can’t prove any of it because it isn’t true. They are throwing any false allegation against the wall to see what will stick.

Sanchez has a good voting record, and she has done work on behalf of US service women who have been the victims of rape.

http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/main/loretta-sanchez-wants-less-wom/