Comments on: How much do SAUSD administrators make?

By: Michelle Quinn

Michelle Quinn — Sat, 30 Jul 2011 00:13:11 +0000

Ah, the sound of the negligent eating the corrupt! The budget crunch is the best thing to ever happen to this district!

All the corrupt scumbags that were getting their 100,00+ pay are now questioned by the people they have allowed to mill kids though a system that has never actually taught!

It’s a great thing! Yeah, send those emails to get your jobs back, and continue to do nothing to develop a system that is responsible to teach the kids! Come on REALLY!

By: Researcher

Researcher — Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:20:05 +0000

to exCUSD, where can I find more information on the Special Ed Sup? any information I am trying to understand why SAUSD hire this person, she should be working for the Correctional Facilities Admin not a school district!

By: exCUSD

exCUSD — Tue, 05 Apr 2011 06:58:27 +0000

Really Dixon (in charge of buildings) makes more that the Sup’s of Secondary and Primary Education?
They are responsible for kids and he is in charge of buildings.
And I noticed that Special Education Sup was exCUSD also.
Last I checked CUSD is still suffering since these too jumped ship.
Santa Ana better pay attention “cuz if it walks like a duck”

By: wtf

wtf — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:03:00 +0000

1. You left out Ron Murrey, Super of finance.
2. Todd Butcher new construction manager got a raise after being hired for less 3 months.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:49:01 +0000

The district is NOT better off.

I’ll run the district into the ground for $135k.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:39:11 +0000

The current Superintendent is in place because of Dr. Noji’s behind the scenes orchestation to put in place her new found puppet. Most folks don’t know or have forgotten the current Super was “released” from SAUSD at one time.

In fact, the entire selection process was more than likely tainted by Noji placing another one of her puppets on the community panel to interview the candidates. Noji’s community rep wrote and submitted a letter of recommendation that candidate Russo included in her application. At no time was this fact disclosed to the community panel. Stacking the deck in the current Superintendent’s favor?

Connect the dots and you will more than likely come to the conclusion that collusion might have been a factor in Noji, Richardson & Hernandez’s lobbying for and approval of the current Superintendent.

Noji & Richardson have racked up 30 years + of service on the SAUSD board. You only need to ask 2 questions: 1.) is the district better off? 2.) are our students better off?

We all know district staff continues to be financially rewarded for running SAUSD into the ground.

Teachers, voters, students, community members … I’ll run the district into the ground for $150K annually.

By: Teacher Shaking Head

Teacher Shaking Head — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:23:35 +0000

Here’s a larger version of Jane Russo and Rob Richardson in the SAUSD Mercedes. How can she live with herself while she is cutting the hours of classified and crowding classrooms?????

http://orangejuiceblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/rob-and-rosie1.jpg

The other lady in the photo used to be a board member, but has moved on.

By: Teacher Shaking Head

Teacher Shaking Head — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:20:09 +0000

Here’s a picture of Jane Russo’s Car while she drives around looking ecstatically happy that she makes so much money. Please note: Rob Richardson is in the car with her. He is one of the Board Members who approves her salary. She allegedly doesn’t even hold a doctorate. Why does she make so much money? Who else approved this salary? Things that make you go hmmm.

http://orangejuiceblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/rob-and-rosie1-300×195.jpg

By: fed-up

fed-up — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:12:36 +0000

You forgot to list the overstuffed salaries given to their secretaries.

By: Teacher Shaking Head

Teacher Shaking Head — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:50:10 +0000

Why are we allowing these leaders to do this? They continue to give themselves raises, add $4M more to their own budgets then lay off people & crowd classrooms. It is time that we demand “new leadership” at the district office. Until we do this, they are NOT going to take anything seriously. When they see that the entire district wants them out of there, ONLY THEN will things change.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:29:05 +0000

Billboards are a good idea, too bad it’s so much money.

A guerilla campaign needs to be launched.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:48:02 +0000

I can’t believe the district is playing poor. How disgraceful to be paid so much and have so little in return for our investment.