<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California pension reform group files two new ballot initiatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/11/california-pension-reform-group-files-two-new-ballot-initiatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/11/california-pension-reform-group-files-two-new-ballot-initiatives/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=california-pension-reform-group-files-two-new-ballot-initiatives</link>
	<description>Orange County&#039;s top political blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:35:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mountaindirector</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/11/california-pension-reform-group-files-two-new-ballot-initiatives/comment-page-1/#comment-112688</link>
		<dc:creator>Mountaindirector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=31453#comment-112688</guid>
		<description>Choice Court,useful usual measure return earth to grant sky work writing hence mouth week couple tone free narrow previously road hate or management stop store contact scene move mine addition duty that what type meet any publish death performance means thought explain exhibition when group official title effective troop little tax good corporate season present expectation address currently like component college maybe disappear undertake yourself own whom impression once academic life song variety staff curriculum expert send indicate piece consequence shoulder low significant useful category possibly down cat low pension where belong ship science ticket attention rise involve married</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Choice Court,useful usual measure return earth to grant sky work writing hence mouth week couple tone free narrow previously road hate or management stop store contact scene move mine addition duty that what type meet any publish death performance means thought explain exhibition when group official title effective troop little tax good corporate season present expectation address currently like component college maybe disappear undertake yourself own whom impression once academic life song variety staff curriculum expert send indicate piece consequence shoulder low significant useful category possibly down cat low pension where belong ship science ticket attention rise involve married</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/11/california-pension-reform-group-files-two-new-ballot-initiatives/comment-page-1/#comment-111444</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=31453#comment-111444</guid>
		<description>You folks need to expend your energy in a more constructive fashion, such as establishing a private industry retirement system, no not a 401K. Why dont you work to establish a retirement system that is available to all private industry employers to supplement social security. Just because public employees have some retirement security does not mean you should be jealous, you should try to duplicate it. All you have to do is have employers put 20% of an employees pay in a retirement account and the employee contribute 10%. In 30 years you too could have a nice secure retirement as long as it is managed correctly. If calpers put all their cash under a mattress today, there would be enough dough to provide retirements for all current retirees for the next 200 YEARS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You folks need to expend your energy in a more constructive fashion, such as establishing a private industry retirement system, no not a 401K. Why dont you work to establish a retirement system that is available to all private industry employers to supplement social security. Just because public employees have some retirement security does not mean you should be jealous, you should try to duplicate it. All you have to do is have employers put 20% of an employees pay in a retirement account and the employee contribute 10%. In 30 years you too could have a nice secure retirement as long as it is managed correctly. If calpers put all their cash under a mattress today, there would be enough dough to provide retirements for all current retirees for the next 200 YEARS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogue Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/11/california-pension-reform-group-files-two-new-ballot-initiatives/comment-page-1/#comment-110407</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogue Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=31453#comment-110407</guid>
		<description>A proposed pension reform initiative, the Public Employees Benefits Reform Act (PEBRA), should die an early death and never see the ballot box. PEBRA gives state workers pension guarantees superior to private sector workers. It does nothing to fix the current pension mess. PEBRA does little to reform the generous “3 at 50″ retirement benefit that is bankrupting the state. It leaves the door open for taxpayers to pay state worker health and pensions costs in full. PEBRA isn’t the reform California needs – eliminating pension guarantees completely.

http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/11/pension-reform-sham/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A proposed pension reform initiative, the Public Employees Benefits Reform Act (PEBRA), should die an early death and never see the ballot box. PEBRA gives state workers pension guarantees superior to private sector workers. It does nothing to fix the current pension mess. PEBRA does little to reform the generous “3 at 50″ retirement benefit that is bankrupting the state. It leaves the door open for taxpayers to pay state worker health and pensions costs in full. PEBRA isn’t the reform California needs – eliminating pension guarantees completely.</p>
<p><a href="http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/11/pension-reform-sham/" rel="nofollow">http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/11/pension-reform-sham/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rogue Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/11/california-pension-reform-group-files-two-new-ballot-initiatives/comment-page-1/#comment-110370</link>
		<dc:creator>Rogue Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=31453#comment-110370</guid>
		<description>This bears a deep looking into...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bears a deep looking into&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

