<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SAUSD News 11/09 (2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/2009-2010-sausd-thread/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/2009-2010-sausd-thread/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=2009-2010-sausd-thread</link>
	<description>Orange County&#039;s top political blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:09:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/2009-2010-sausd-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-156766</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=31146#comment-156766</guid>
		<description>Thank you MegaFed-Up, but I have these idiots running like scared rats! They can ridicule me all they want! If they think my spelling and grammar is bad now, they obviously did not read any of my post&#039;s a year ago!:)

I love the tips on my spelling and grammar it&#039;s actually very helpful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you MegaFed-Up, but I have these idiots running like scared rats! They can ridicule me all they want! If they think my spelling and grammar is bad now, they obviously did not read any of my post&#8217;s a year ago!:)</p>
<p>I love the tips on my spelling and grammar it&#8217;s actually very helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/2009-2010-sausd-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-156765</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=31146#comment-156765</guid>
		<description>You are right, I can&#039;t spell! 

But I sure can speak, and I am making you angry enough to get all juvenile!

Am I hitting too close to home? GOOD!

&quot;The principal ingredient to a good education is an excellent teacher; Santa Ana has very few!&quot;

&quot;The principle of Willard is surrounded by idiot&#039;s!&quot;

Is that right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, I can&#8217;t spell! </p>
<p>But I sure can speak, and I am making you angry enough to get all juvenile!</p>
<p>Am I hitting too close to home? GOOD!</p>
<p>&#8220;The principal ingredient to a good education is an excellent teacher; Santa Ana has very few!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The principle of Willard is surrounded by idiot&#8217;s!&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/2009-2010-sausd-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-156763</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=31146#comment-156763</guid>
		<description>What Irvine 2nd graders? Good idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Irvine 2nd graders? Good idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/2009-2010-sausd-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-147885</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 07:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=31146#comment-147885</guid>
		<description>Those tax cuts did not make us richer; they’ve made us poorer.

MQ says:

Sorry, but you are the example of an education does not make you smart!

That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard! Let me break it down for you! 

Taxes is taken from people by the government to pay for their ridiculous programs like Public Education! So Yes taxes DO make us poorer!

In NY they pay per student about 25,000 and it is one of the worst (if not the worst) in the country! Why! 

YOU!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those tax cuts did not make us richer; they’ve made us poorer.</p>
<p>MQ says:</p>
<p>Sorry, but you are the example of an education does not make you smart!</p>
<p>That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard! Let me break it down for you! </p>
<p>Taxes is taken from people by the government to pay for their ridiculous programs like Public Education! So Yes taxes DO make us poorer!</p>
<p>In NY they pay per student about 25,000 and it is one of the worst (if not the worst) in the country! Why! </p>
<p>YOU!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MegaFed-Up</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/2009-2010-sausd-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-114829</link>
		<dc:creator>MegaFed-Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 05:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=31146#comment-114829</guid>
		<description>TO MICHELLE,

As someone involved in education I understand your disappointment. I know future generations are getting screwed by a system which sets high standards (in CA, in particular, above the national) and then ties the hands of parents, teachers and administrators alike. 

Many of us are scared to speak the truth. Many of us will not admit, publicly, that we are being set up for failure by a group of self-serving politicians. Yes, there are a few pseudo educators/administrators out there. But in reality the grand majority of people in education intend to do the best for the students.  The truth, we are not being allowed to do our job!  

The power to control education is being taken from the hands of the community and educators alike!  When a system doesn&#039;t allow parents, administrators and teachers to do their job, a job they know how to do, by forcing them to follow programs designed to &quot;teach to the test&quot; and then in turn blames them for the low performance of students, you know there is a set up.

Dear Michelle, please think about this message.  Please know that most of the people involved in education are there because of true vocation. Most of us are there because we want future generations to get a hold of the information we have mastered.  Most of us, idealist as it may seem, are here because we believe that the future is in the hands of our children.  I ask you to join good teachers and good administrators (and everyone knows who, in every school, is a true educator) to defend the rights of our children.  Together we can demand that the rights of future generations of students be honored.  Demand lower teacher student ratios. Demand time for students to do less homework and have more time to dialogue with their family.  Demand more enrichment programs: debate, science, music, art, field-trips, etc.   I once read that Native-Americans believe the land/world we occupy belongs to the next generation of children. We are here merely in a &quot;borrowing&quot; mode.  As someone who borrows, it is our duty to, at least,  maintain things as we obtained them. If possible, we are expected to return the world in the same or better condition, never worst!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO MICHELLE,</p>
<p>As someone involved in education I understand your disappointment. I know future generations are getting screwed by a system which sets high standards (in CA, in particular, above the national) and then ties the hands of parents, teachers and administrators alike. </p>
<p>Many of us are scared to speak the truth. Many of us will not admit, publicly, that we are being set up for failure by a group of self-serving politicians. Yes, there are a few pseudo educators/administrators out there. But in reality the grand majority of people in education intend to do the best for the students.  The truth, we are not being allowed to do our job!  </p>
<p>The power to control education is being taken from the hands of the community and educators alike!  When a system doesn&#8217;t allow parents, administrators and teachers to do their job, a job they know how to do, by forcing them to follow programs designed to &#8220;teach to the test&#8221; and then in turn blames them for the low performance of students, you know there is a set up.</p>
<p>Dear Michelle, please think about this message.  Please know that most of the people involved in education are there because of true vocation. Most of us are there because we want future generations to get a hold of the information we have mastered.  Most of us, idealist as it may seem, are here because we believe that the future is in the hands of our children.  I ask you to join good teachers and good administrators (and everyone knows who, in every school, is a true educator) to defend the rights of our children.  Together we can demand that the rights of future generations of students be honored.  Demand lower teacher student ratios. Demand time for students to do less homework and have more time to dialogue with their family.  Demand more enrichment programs: debate, science, music, art, field-trips, etc.   I once read that Native-Americans believe the land/world we occupy belongs to the next generation of children. We are here merely in a &#8220;borrowing&#8221; mode.  As someone who borrows, it is our duty to, at least,  maintain things as we obtained them. If possible, we are expected to return the world in the same or better condition, never worst!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MegaFed-Up</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/2009-2010-sausd-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-114827</link>
		<dc:creator>MegaFed-Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 04:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=31146#comment-114827</guid>
		<description>To #15 and #16
 
Sure, try to deviate the message by focusing on spelling.  Maybe the reason why Michelle didn&#039;t spell words correctly is due to the inferior performance of people involved in education, like you!  Who gives a f&amp;#@, how Michelle spelled!  IF THERE WAS AN OUNCE OF GOODNESS IN YOUR HEART, YOU WOULD HAVE TAKEN THIS OPPORTUNITY TO REITERATE THE MESSAGE USING THE WORDS SHE MISSPELLED CORRECTLY.   Shame on you for trying to ridicule Michelle... She actually brought to the table valid information.  

Michelle, never mind these jerks, you are pushing their buttons, that is obvious...  By the way, I understood your point.  If &quot;Anonymous&quot; and &quot;teach me says&quot; are so tight a@# that they can&#039;t understand what you meant, that is an amplified indication of their enormous limitations!!!  Both of you should get out of the education environment because your &quot;grandeur&quot; is keeping you from connecting to the community you are EXPECTED to RESPECT, and SERVE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To #15 and #16</p>
<p>Sure, try to deviate the message by focusing on spelling.  Maybe the reason why Michelle didn&#8217;t spell words correctly is due to the inferior performance of people involved in education, like you!  Who gives a f&amp;#@, how Michelle spelled!  IF THERE WAS AN OUNCE OF GOODNESS IN YOUR HEART, YOU WOULD HAVE TAKEN THIS OPPORTUNITY TO REITERATE THE MESSAGE USING THE WORDS SHE MISSPELLED CORRECTLY.   Shame on you for trying to ridicule Michelle&#8230; She actually brought to the table valid information.  </p>
<p>Michelle, never mind these jerks, you are pushing their buttons, that is obvious&#8230;  By the way, I understood your point.  If &#8220;Anonymous&#8221; and &#8220;teach me says&#8221; are so tight a@# that they can&#8217;t understand what you meant, that is an amplified indication of their enormous limitations!!!  Both of you should get out of the education environment because your &#8220;grandeur&#8221; is keeping you from connecting to the community you are EXPECTED to RESPECT, and SERVE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/2009-2010-sausd-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-113391</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=31146#comment-113391</guid>
		<description>Hmmm - do you think Michelle know the difference between principle and principal?  We know she can&#039;t spell and she does well with cutting &amp; pasting long, long, posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm &#8211; do you think Michelle know the difference between principle and principal?  We know she can&#8217;t spell and she does well with cutting &amp; pasting long, long, posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teach me</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/2009-2010-sausd-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-112808</link>
		<dc:creator>teach me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=31146#comment-112808</guid>
		<description>Michelle,
We also like spelling......I think you meant include, as there is no such word as enclude- you could ask my class of 2nd graders from last year whom were 95% proficient in language arts- even they know how to spell. There&#039;s a number for you to, as you say ,&quot;enclude&quot; to your statistics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle,<br />
We also like spelling&#8230;&#8230;I think you meant include, as there is no such word as enclude- you could ask my class of 2nd graders from last year whom were 95% proficient in language arts- even they know how to spell. There&#8217;s a number for you to, as you say ,&#8221;enclude&#8221; to your statistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/2009-2010-sausd-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-112541</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=31146#comment-112541</guid>
		<description>I was going for build it!

sorry:(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going for build it!</p>
<p>sorry:(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/2009-2010-sausd-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-112536</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=31146#comment-112536</guid>
		<description>I am sorry for the long post, I could not post the link. 

I really want you to take a good look at your work. These kids are screwed, because of your lack of advocation. You know they are failing, yet you sit back and take the paycheck. Speak up and have some respect for a job that can break a life or guild it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry for the long post, I could not post the link. </p>
<p>I really want you to take a good look at your work. These kids are screwed, because of your lack of advocation. You know they are failing, yet you sit back and take the paycheck. Speak up and have some respect for a job that can break a life or guild it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/2009-2010-sausd-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-112535</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=31146#comment-112535</guid>
		<description>Since SAUSD teachers and admins love numbers so much, i just wanted to share with you what facts i have been digging up. 
The bottom line is Santa Ana ADA per student is over 10,000+ per student. Teachers in Santa Ana make more than the teachers in Irvine- encluding priciples at over 120,000 + year. This does not enclude QEIA grants ect.... and below is the results. Its not the kids that are failing, its the teachers and the district that is failing the kids. Parents are also a big problem, but your never going to solve anything unless the teachers take pride and expect only the best from their students and themselves.

I was shocked at OUSD results, disgusted at SAUSD. 


 
California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)  
Santa Ana Unified District  
All Students  
Total Enrollment on First Day of Testing:    41,632      County Name:    Orange County                        
Total Number Tested:    41,437      District Name:    Santa Ana Unified District         
Total Number Tested in Selected Subgroup:    41,437      School Name:    ----         
      CDS Code:    30-66670-0000000       
       
 
California Standards Test Scores - 2008     

 
 
 
 
  Grades 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9    10    11    EOC    

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Reported Enrollment 4,610 4,324 4,255 4,267 4,160 4,169 4,141 4,260 3,922 3,524    
CST English-Language Arts                                  
    Students Tested 4,554 4,258 4,185 4,180 4,114 4,121 4,098 4,160 3,795 3,369   
     %  of Enrollment 98.8 %  98.5 %  98.4 %  98.0 %  98.9 %  98.8 %  99.0 %  97.7 %  96.8 %  95.6 %    
    Students with Scores 4,546 4,256 4,183 4,178 4,114 4,121 4,092 4,145 3,767 3,346   
    Mean Scale Score 330.0 314.4 339.9 328.4 326.1 326.3 322.6 324.8 313.8 305.3   
     %  Advanced 8 %  3 %  15 %  8 %  8 %  9 %  8 %  10 %  10 %  7 %    
     %  Proficient 26 %  19 %  27 %  25 %  21 %  25 %  23 %  22 %  16 %  16 %    
     %  Basic 36 %  42 %  37 %  40 %  40 %  31 %  35 %  32 %  30 %  28 %    
     %  Below Basic 19 %  22 %  14 %  18 %  19 %  21 %  19 %  23 %  25 %  25 %    
     %  Far Below Basic 10 %  13 %  7 %  10 %  11 %  14 %  14 %  12 %  19 %  25 %    
CST Mathematics                                  
    Students Tested 4,551 4,262 4,188 4,181 4,114 3,936           
     %  of Enrollment 98.7 %  98.6 %  98.4 %  98.0 %  98.9 %  94.4 %            
    Students with Scores 4,545 4,254 4,187 4,179 4,114 3,935           
    Mean Scale Score 339.1 358.8 355.8 336.7 326.3 334.3           
     %  Advanced 14 %  22 %  21 %  12 %  7 %  12 %            
     %  Proficient 28 %  31 %  31 %  26 %  22 %  26 %            
     %  Basic 28 %  26 %  29 %  27 %  34 %  30 %            
     %  Below Basic 24 %  16 %  16 %  26 %  29 %  23 %            
     %  Far Below Basic 7 %  5 %  3 %  9 %  7 %  9 %            
CST General Mathematics (Grades 6 &amp; 7 Standards)                                  
    Students Tested             2,265 406     2,671 
     %  of Enrollment             54.7 %  9.5 %        
    Students with Scores             2,263 405     2,668 
    Mean Scale Score             312.1 277.4     306.8 
     %  Advanced             3 %  0 %      3 %  
     %  Proficient             20 %  4 %      18 %  
     %  Basic             34 %  19 %      32 %  
     %  Below Basic             29 %  45 %      32 %  
     %  Far Below Basic             13 %  31 %      16 %  
CST Algebra I                                  
    Students Tested           108 1,813 2,754 931 357 5,963 
     %  of Enrollment           2.6 %  43.8 %  64.6 %  23.7 %  10.1 %    
    Students with Scores           108 1,812 2,742 924 353 5,939 
    Mean Scale Score           377.4 357.7 290.1 269.6 266.5 307.7 
     %  Advanced           25 %  15 %  1 %  0 %  0 %  5 %  
     %  Proficient           36 %  38 %  10 %  3 %  4 %  18 %  
     %  Basic           31 %  26 %  26 %  14 %  10 %  24 %  
     %  Below Basic           6 %  17 %  43 %  50 %  50 %  36 %  
     %  Far Below Basic           2 %  4 %  20 %  33 %  36 %  18 %  
CST Integrated Math 1                                  
    Students Tested             1 1 1   3 
     %  of Enrollment                       
    Students with Scores             1 1 1   3 
    Mean Scale Score              *  *  *    * 
     %  Advanced              *  *  *    * 
     %  Proficient              *  *  *    * 
     %  Basic              *  *  *    * 
     %  Below Basic              *  *  *    * 
     %  Far Below Basic              *  *  *    * 
CST Geometry                                  
    Students Tested               967 1,991 968 3,926 
     %  of Enrollment               22.7 %  50.8 %  27.5 %    
    Students with Scores               966 1,988 961 3,915 
    Mean Scale Score               323.7 262.4 250.1 274.5 
     %  Advanced               7 %  0 %  0 %  2 %  
     %  Proficient               22 %  2 %  1 %  7 %  
     %  Basic               31 %  12 %  5 %  15 %  
     %  Below Basic               36 %  53 %  48 %  47 %  
     %  Far Below Basic               4 %  33 %  47 %  29 %  
CST Integrated Math 2                                  
    Students Tested                   1 1 
     %  of Enrollment                       
    Students with Scores                   1 1 
    Mean Scale Score                    *  * 
     %  Advanced                    *  * 
     %  Proficient                    *  * 
     %  Basic                    *  * 
     %  Below Basic                    *  * 
     %  Far Below Basic                    *  * 
CST Algebra II                                  
    Students Tested               17 819 1,255 2,091 
     %  of Enrollment               0.4 %  20.9 %  35.6 %    
    Students with Scores               17 817 1,255 2,089 
    Mean Scale Score               337.6 312.2 263.6 283.2 
     %  Advanced               0 %  3 %  0 %  1 %  
     %  Proficient               47 %  18 %  3 %  9 %  
     %  Basic               41 %  38 %  14 %  24 %  
     %  Below Basic               12 %  28 %  34 %  32 %  
     %  Far Below Basic               0 %  13 %  48 %  34 %  
CST Summative High School Mathematics (Grades 9-11)                                  
    Students Tested                 26 721 747 
     %  of Enrollment                 0.7 %  20.5 %    
    Students with Scores                 26 718 744 
    Mean Scale Score                 360.6 303.6 305.6 
     %  Advanced                 19 %  3 %  4 %  
     %  Proficient                 31 %  16 %  17 %  
     %  Basic                 23 %  30 %  30 %  
     %  Below Basic                 23 %  40 %  39 %  
     %  Far Below Basic                 4 %  10 %  10 %  
CST History-Social Science (Grade 8 Cumulative)                                  
    Students Tested             4,084         
     %  of Enrollment             98.6 %          
    Students with Scores             4,080         
    Mean Scale Score             318.9         
     %  Advanced             8 %          
     %  Proficient             17 %          
     %  Basic             35 %          
     %  Below Basic             23 %          
     %  Far Below Basic             17 %          
CST World History                                  
    Students Tested               54 3,639 251 3,944 
     %  of Enrollment               1.3 %  92.8 %  7.1 %    
    Students with Scores               14 3,632 218 3,864 
    Mean Scale Score               219.9 304.3 270.2 302.1 
     %  Advanced               0 %  6 %  2 %  5 %  
     %  Proficient               0 %  14 %  4 %  14 %  
     %  Basic               0 %  25 %  12 %  25 %  
     %  Below Basic               7 %  19 %  22 %  19 %  
     %  Far Below Basic               93 %  36 %  61 %  38 %  
CST U.S. History                                  
    Students Tested                   3,320   
     %  of Enrollment                   94.2 %    
    Students with Scores                   3,313   
    Mean Scale Score                   313.6   
     %  Advanced                   9 %    
     %  Proficient                   17 %    
     %  Basic                   27 %    
     %  Below Basic                   22 %    
     %  Far Below Basic                   25 %    
CST Science (Grade 5, Grade 8, and Grade 10 Life Science)                                  
    Students Tested       4,176     4,084   3,752     
     %  of Enrollment       97.9 %      98.6 %    95.7 %      
    Students with Scores       4,173     4,081   3,738     
    Mean Scale Score       319.3     338.4   315.9     
     %  Advanced       4 %      19 %    7 %      
     %  Proficient       23 %      26 %    19 %      
     %  Basic       39 %      24 %    30 %      
     %  Below Basic       21 %      16 %    24 %      
     %  Far Below Basic       13 %      15 %    20 %      
CST Biology/Life Sciences                                  
    Students Tested               945 2,977 1,768 5,690 
     %  of Enrollment               22.2 %  75.9 %  50.2 %    
    Students with Scores               945 2,975 1,767 5,687 
    Mean Scale Score               353.0 305.1 305.7 313.3 
     %  Advanced               13 %  2 %  4 %  4 %  
     %  Proficient               40 %  12 %  12 %  17 %  
     %  Basic               39 %  38 %  35 %  38 %  
     %  Below Basic               5 %  23 %  24 %  20 %  
     %  Far Below Basic               3 %  25 %  26 %  21 %  
CST Chemistry                                  
    Students Tested                 711 1,136 1,847 
     %  of Enrollment                 18.1 %  32.2 %    
    Students with Scores                 711 1,135 1,846 
    Mean Scale Score                 331.5 301.0 312.8 
     %  Advanced                 9 %  4 %  5 %  
     %  Proficient                 22 %  9 %  14 %  
     %  Basic                 48 %  32 %  38 %  
     %  Below Basic                 11 %  23 %  18 %  
     %  Far Below Basic                 11 %  33 %  24 %  
CST Earth Science                                  
    Students Tested               3,142 36 102 3,280 
     %  of Enrollment               73.8 %  0.9 %  2.9 %    
    Students with Scores               3,139 36 102 3,277 
    Mean Scale Score               305.8 295.1 291.6 305.2 
     %  Advanced               2 %  3 %  1 %  2 %  
     %  Proficient               9 %  6 %  10 %  9 %  
     %  Basic               43 %  25 %  25 %  42 %  
     %  Below Basic               23 %  33 %  22 %  23 %  
     %  Far Below Basic               22 %  33 %  42 %  23 %  
CST Physics                                  
    Students Tested                 3 221 224 
     %  of Enrollment                 0.1 %  6.3 %    
    Students with Scores                 3 220 223 
    Mean Scale Score                  * 343.4 343.0 
     %  Advanced                  * 16 %  16 %  
     %  Proficient                  * 26 %  26 %  
     %  Basic                  * 37 %  37 %  
     %  Below Basic                  * 13 %  13 %  
     %  Far Below Basic                  * 7 %  7 %  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
  


California Department of Education 

©2009 California Department of Education 
Page generated 12/2/2009 8:08:38 PM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since SAUSD teachers and admins love numbers so much, i just wanted to share with you what facts i have been digging up.<br />
The bottom line is Santa Ana ADA per student is over 10,000+ per student. Teachers in Santa Ana make more than the teachers in Irvine- encluding priciples at over 120,000 + year. This does not enclude QEIA grants ect&#8230;. and below is the results. Its not the kids that are failing, its the teachers and the district that is failing the kids. Parents are also a big problem, but your never going to solve anything unless the teachers take pride and expect only the best from their students and themselves.</p>
<p>I was shocked at OUSD results, disgusted at SAUSD. </p>
<p>California Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)<br />
Santa Ana Unified District<br />
All Students<br />
Total Enrollment on First Day of Testing:    41,632      County Name:    Orange County<br />
Total Number Tested:    41,437      District Name:    Santa Ana Unified District<br />
Total Number Tested in Selected Subgroup:    41,437      School Name:    &#8212;-<br />
      CDS Code:    30-66670-0000000       </p>
<p>California Standards Test Scores &#8211; 2008     </p>
<p>  Grades </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9    10    11    EOC    </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Reported Enrollment 4,610 4,324 4,255 4,267 4,160 4,169 4,141 4,260 3,922 3,524<br />
CST English-Language Arts<br />
    Students Tested 4,554 4,258 4,185 4,180 4,114 4,121 4,098 4,160 3,795 3,369<br />
     %  of Enrollment 98.8 %  98.5 %  98.4 %  98.0 %  98.9 %  98.8 %  99.0 %  97.7 %  96.8 %  95.6 %<br />
    Students with Scores 4,546 4,256 4,183 4,178 4,114 4,121 4,092 4,145 3,767 3,346<br />
    Mean Scale Score 330.0 314.4 339.9 328.4 326.1 326.3 322.6 324.8 313.8 305.3<br />
     %  Advanced 8 %  3 %  15 %  8 %  8 %  9 %  8 %  10 %  10 %  7 %<br />
     %  Proficient 26 %  19 %  27 %  25 %  21 %  25 %  23 %  22 %  16 %  16 %<br />
     %  Basic 36 %  42 %  37 %  40 %  40 %  31 %  35 %  32 %  30 %  28 %<br />
     %  Below Basic 19 %  22 %  14 %  18 %  19 %  21 %  19 %  23 %  25 %  25 %<br />
     %  Far Below Basic 10 %  13 %  7 %  10 %  11 %  14 %  14 %  12 %  19 %  25 %<br />
CST Mathematics<br />
    Students Tested 4,551 4,262 4,188 4,181 4,114 3,936<br />
     %  of Enrollment 98.7 %  98.6 %  98.4 %  98.0 %  98.9 %  94.4 %<br />
    Students with Scores 4,545 4,254 4,187 4,179 4,114 3,935<br />
    Mean Scale Score 339.1 358.8 355.8 336.7 326.3 334.3<br />
     %  Advanced 14 %  22 %  21 %  12 %  7 %  12 %<br />
     %  Proficient 28 %  31 %  31 %  26 %  22 %  26 %<br />
     %  Basic 28 %  26 %  29 %  27 %  34 %  30 %<br />
     %  Below Basic 24 %  16 %  16 %  26 %  29 %  23 %<br />
     %  Far Below Basic 7 %  5 %  3 %  9 %  7 %  9 %<br />
CST General Mathematics (Grades 6 &amp; 7 Standards)<br />
    Students Tested             2,265 406     2,671<br />
     %  of Enrollment             54.7 %  9.5 %<br />
    Students with Scores             2,263 405     2,668<br />
    Mean Scale Score             312.1 277.4     306.8<br />
     %  Advanced             3 %  0 %      3 %<br />
     %  Proficient             20 %  4 %      18 %<br />
     %  Basic             34 %  19 %      32 %<br />
     %  Below Basic             29 %  45 %      32 %<br />
     %  Far Below Basic             13 %  31 %      16 %<br />
CST Algebra I<br />
    Students Tested           108 1,813 2,754 931 357 5,963<br />
     %  of Enrollment           2.6 %  43.8 %  64.6 %  23.7 %  10.1 %<br />
    Students with Scores           108 1,812 2,742 924 353 5,939<br />
    Mean Scale Score           377.4 357.7 290.1 269.6 266.5 307.7<br />
     %  Advanced           25 %  15 %  1 %  0 %  0 %  5 %<br />
     %  Proficient           36 %  38 %  10 %  3 %  4 %  18 %<br />
     %  Basic           31 %  26 %  26 %  14 %  10 %  24 %<br />
     %  Below Basic           6 %  17 %  43 %  50 %  50 %  36 %<br />
     %  Far Below Basic           2 %  4 %  20 %  33 %  36 %  18 %<br />
CST Integrated Math 1<br />
    Students Tested             1 1 1   3<br />
     %  of Enrollment<br />
    Students with Scores             1 1 1   3<br />
    Mean Scale Score              *  *  *    *<br />
     %  Advanced              *  *  *    *<br />
     %  Proficient              *  *  *    *<br />
     %  Basic              *  *  *    *<br />
     %  Below Basic              *  *  *    *<br />
     %  Far Below Basic              *  *  *    *<br />
CST Geometry<br />
    Students Tested               967 1,991 968 3,926<br />
     %  of Enrollment               22.7 %  50.8 %  27.5 %<br />
    Students with Scores               966 1,988 961 3,915<br />
    Mean Scale Score               323.7 262.4 250.1 274.5<br />
     %  Advanced               7 %  0 %  0 %  2 %<br />
     %  Proficient               22 %  2 %  1 %  7 %<br />
     %  Basic               31 %  12 %  5 %  15 %<br />
     %  Below Basic               36 %  53 %  48 %  47 %<br />
     %  Far Below Basic               4 %  33 %  47 %  29 %<br />
CST Integrated Math 2<br />
    Students Tested                   1 1<br />
     %  of Enrollment<br />
    Students with Scores                   1 1<br />
    Mean Scale Score                    *  *<br />
     %  Advanced                    *  *<br />
     %  Proficient                    *  *<br />
     %  Basic                    *  *<br />
     %  Below Basic                    *  *<br />
     %  Far Below Basic                    *  *<br />
CST Algebra II<br />
    Students Tested               17 819 1,255 2,091<br />
     %  of Enrollment               0.4 %  20.9 %  35.6 %<br />
    Students with Scores               17 817 1,255 2,089<br />
    Mean Scale Score               337.6 312.2 263.6 283.2<br />
     %  Advanced               0 %  3 %  0 %  1 %<br />
     %  Proficient               47 %  18 %  3 %  9 %<br />
     %  Basic               41 %  38 %  14 %  24 %<br />
     %  Below Basic               12 %  28 %  34 %  32 %<br />
     %  Far Below Basic               0 %  13 %  48 %  34 %<br />
CST Summative High School Mathematics (Grades 9-11)<br />
    Students Tested                 26 721 747<br />
     %  of Enrollment                 0.7 %  20.5 %<br />
    Students with Scores                 26 718 744<br />
    Mean Scale Score                 360.6 303.6 305.6<br />
     %  Advanced                 19 %  3 %  4 %<br />
     %  Proficient                 31 %  16 %  17 %<br />
     %  Basic                 23 %  30 %  30 %<br />
     %  Below Basic                 23 %  40 %  39 %<br />
     %  Far Below Basic                 4 %  10 %  10 %<br />
CST History-Social Science (Grade 8 Cumulative)<br />
    Students Tested             4,084<br />
     %  of Enrollment             98.6 %<br />
    Students with Scores             4,080<br />
    Mean Scale Score             318.9<br />
     %  Advanced             8 %<br />
     %  Proficient             17 %<br />
     %  Basic             35 %<br />
     %  Below Basic             23 %<br />
     %  Far Below Basic             17 %<br />
CST World History<br />
    Students Tested               54 3,639 251 3,944<br />
     %  of Enrollment               1.3 %  92.8 %  7.1 %<br />
    Students with Scores               14 3,632 218 3,864<br />
    Mean Scale Score               219.9 304.3 270.2 302.1<br />
     %  Advanced               0 %  6 %  2 %  5 %<br />
     %  Proficient               0 %  14 %  4 %  14 %<br />
     %  Basic               0 %  25 %  12 %  25 %<br />
     %  Below Basic               7 %  19 %  22 %  19 %<br />
     %  Far Below Basic               93 %  36 %  61 %  38 %<br />
CST U.S. History<br />
    Students Tested                   3,320<br />
     %  of Enrollment                   94.2 %<br />
    Students with Scores                   3,313<br />
    Mean Scale Score                   313.6<br />
     %  Advanced                   9 %<br />
     %  Proficient                   17 %<br />
     %  Basic                   27 %<br />
     %  Below Basic                   22 %<br />
     %  Far Below Basic                   25 %<br />
CST Science (Grade 5, Grade 8, and Grade 10 Life Science)<br />
    Students Tested       4,176     4,084   3,752<br />
     %  of Enrollment       97.9 %      98.6 %    95.7 %<br />
    Students with Scores       4,173     4,081   3,738<br />
    Mean Scale Score       319.3     338.4   315.9<br />
     %  Advanced       4 %      19 %    7 %<br />
     %  Proficient       23 %      26 %    19 %<br />
     %  Basic       39 %      24 %    30 %<br />
     %  Below Basic       21 %      16 %    24 %<br />
     %  Far Below Basic       13 %      15 %    20 %<br />
CST Biology/Life Sciences<br />
    Students Tested               945 2,977 1,768 5,690<br />
     %  of Enrollment               22.2 %  75.9 %  50.2 %<br />
    Students with Scores               945 2,975 1,767 5,687<br />
    Mean Scale Score               353.0 305.1 305.7 313.3<br />
     %  Advanced               13 %  2 %  4 %  4 %<br />
     %  Proficient               40 %  12 %  12 %  17 %<br />
     %  Basic               39 %  38 %  35 %  38 %<br />
     %  Below Basic               5 %  23 %  24 %  20 %<br />
     %  Far Below Basic               3 %  25 %  26 %  21 %<br />
CST Chemistry<br />
    Students Tested                 711 1,136 1,847<br />
     %  of Enrollment                 18.1 %  32.2 %<br />
    Students with Scores                 711 1,135 1,846<br />
    Mean Scale Score                 331.5 301.0 312.8<br />
     %  Advanced                 9 %  4 %  5 %<br />
     %  Proficient                 22 %  9 %  14 %<br />
     %  Basic                 48 %  32 %  38 %<br />
     %  Below Basic                 11 %  23 %  18 %<br />
     %  Far Below Basic                 11 %  33 %  24 %<br />
CST Earth Science<br />
    Students Tested               3,142 36 102 3,280<br />
     %  of Enrollment               73.8 %  0.9 %  2.9 %<br />
    Students with Scores               3,139 36 102 3,277<br />
    Mean Scale Score               305.8 295.1 291.6 305.2<br />
     %  Advanced               2 %  3 %  1 %  2 %<br />
     %  Proficient               9 %  6 %  10 %  9 %<br />
     %  Basic               43 %  25 %  25 %  42 %<br />
     %  Below Basic               23 %  33 %  22 %  23 %<br />
     %  Far Below Basic               22 %  33 %  42 %  23 %<br />
CST Physics<br />
    Students Tested                 3 221 224<br />
     %  of Enrollment                 0.1 %  6.3 %<br />
    Students with Scores                 3 220 223<br />
    Mean Scale Score                  * 343.4 343.0<br />
     %  Advanced                  * 16 %  16 %<br />
     %  Proficient                  * 26 %  26 %<br />
     %  Basic                  * 37 %  37 %<br />
     %  Below Basic                  * 13 %  13 %<br />
     %  Far Below Basic                  * 7 %  7 %  </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>California Department of Education </p>
<p>©2009 California Department of Education<br />
Page generated 12/2/2009 8:08:38 PM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lost Interest</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/2009-2010-sausd-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-110685</link>
		<dc:creator>Lost Interest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=31146#comment-110685</guid>
		<description>I have lost interest in reading the blog because people keep on posting long posts.  Please place a link to the post to not take up the space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have lost interest in reading the blog because people keep on posting long posts.  Please place a link to the post to not take up the space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

