<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why didn&#8217;t Andrew Do mention his sandwich shop during his council campaign?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/12/why-didnt-andrew-do-mention-his-sandwich-shop-during-his-council-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/12/why-didnt-andrew-do-mention-his-sandwich-shop-during-his-council-campaign/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-didnt-andrew-do-mention-his-sandwich-shop-during-his-council-campaign</link>
	<description>Orange County&#039;s top political blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:09:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesus</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/12/why-didnt-andrew-do-mention-his-sandwich-shop-during-his-council-campaign/comment-page-2/#comment-85832</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=15677#comment-85832</guid>
		<description>This whole &quot;political discussion&quot; is actually insecure people with extreme biases mudslinging each other when much more lucrative uses of this valuable time can be utilized to help the community improve for everyone. Do you all feel BIG because you can type slanderous remarks about people while spending countless hours researching every comment/action someone has made. Immature nobody&#039;s like to pretend they grasp a grain of significance in their lives by down talking others through the medium of the internet to avoid consequence. Twisting words and causing conflicts aren&#039;t going to solve differences/problems, only solidify aggressive factions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole &#8220;political discussion&#8221; is actually insecure people with extreme biases mudslinging each other when much more lucrative uses of this valuable time can be utilized to help the community improve for everyone. Do you all feel BIG because you can type slanderous remarks about people while spending countless hours researching every comment/action someone has made. Immature nobody&#8217;s like to pretend they grasp a grain of significance in their lives by down talking others through the medium of the internet to avoid consequence. Twisting words and causing conflicts aren&#8217;t going to solve differences/problems, only solidify aggressive factions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonyms</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/12/why-didnt-andrew-do-mention-his-sandwich-shop-during-his-council-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-77297</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonyms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 07:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=15677#comment-77297</guid>
		<description>Gee, maybe I am being thin-skinned, what if TCT is right and I misread the original comment?

&quot;See what I mean? Look at the statement, “in the OC most of them do seem to be rather nefarious, don’t they?” If that is not racist to an average reader?

You are no better than all of these VN politicans strong-arming people you don’t like by probing into their personal life.

The VN Contingent are preparing to do the same to your personal information. Wait and see how we plan to discredit who you are and what you represent.

Art, the enemy of the masses.&quot;

Oh I see it now, TCT is only acting like a Viet threatening Art. That&#039;s very different and disgusting on a whole new level. Please accept my appologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, maybe I am being thin-skinned, what if TCT is right and I misread the original comment?</p>
<p>&#8220;See what I mean? Look at the statement, “in the OC most of them do seem to be rather nefarious, don’t they?” If that is not racist to an average reader?</p>
<p>You are no better than all of these VN politicans strong-arming people you don’t like by probing into their personal life.</p>
<p>The VN Contingent are preparing to do the same to your personal information. Wait and see how we plan to discredit who you are and what you represent.</p>
<p>Art, the enemy of the masses.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh I see it now, TCT is only acting like a Viet threatening Art. That&#8217;s very different and disgusting on a whole new level. Please accept my appologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Choo Trane</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/12/why-didnt-andrew-do-mention-his-sandwich-shop-during-his-council-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-77295</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Choo Trane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 05:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=15677#comment-77295</guid>
		<description>As for you, Junior, I shall not dignify your question with a response because your child(ren) already know(s) that answer. Go ask them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for you, Junior, I shall not dignify your question with a response because your child(ren) already know(s) that answer. Go ask them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Choo Trane</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/12/why-didnt-andrew-do-mention-his-sandwich-shop-during-his-council-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-77294</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Choo Trane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 05:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=15677#comment-77294</guid>
		<description>@Anonyms:

Trying to be the hero?  If you read the initial blog more thoroughly, you would know where it is going.  Obviously not, reacting like a teenager.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anonyms:</p>
<p>Trying to be the hero?  If you read the initial blog more thoroughly, you would know where it is going.  Obviously not, reacting like a teenager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Choo Trane</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/12/why-didnt-andrew-do-mention-his-sandwich-shop-during-his-council-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-77293</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Choo Trane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 05:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=15677#comment-77293</guid>
		<description>Now I know how Jubal feels with enemies circling about.  Give me time to reply to you all, starting with Red Vixen.

Jubal usually does good research on any subject, covering most of the material.  His peer usually uses his blog as one reference.  He states the facts accurately as far as I know most of the time.  

From the facts comes analysis based on many variables from educational background, general knowledge, beliefs, moral values, and so forth.  

Jubal sees topics one dimensionally, which I stated earlier, which is not incorrect.  However, at times, the reader would like to know if he knows the other side of the argument.  He could state what opposite view is, then either refute his earlier view or affirm his existing view, and this leaves the reader with fewer doubts about his grasp on the topic.

As for consistency in reporting, Jubal is human like all of us with many influences, from the making a living, upholding personal values, supporting a family, paying a mortgage, and so forth.  We all cannot be perfect all the time, so read his postings with balance and try not be too judgemental because the reader is supposed to read different types of news sources before making a determination, right?  Jubal never says that his posting is the ONLY PERSPECTIVE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I know how Jubal feels with enemies circling about.  Give me time to reply to you all, starting with Red Vixen.</p>
<p>Jubal usually does good research on any subject, covering most of the material.  His peer usually uses his blog as one reference.  He states the facts accurately as far as I know most of the time.  </p>
<p>From the facts comes analysis based on many variables from educational background, general knowledge, beliefs, moral values, and so forth.  </p>
<p>Jubal sees topics one dimensionally, which I stated earlier, which is not incorrect.  However, at times, the reader would like to know if he knows the other side of the argument.  He could state what opposite view is, then either refute his earlier view or affirm his existing view, and this leaves the reader with fewer doubts about his grasp on the topic.</p>
<p>As for consistency in reporting, Jubal is human like all of us with many influences, from the making a living, upholding personal values, supporting a family, paying a mortgage, and so forth.  We all cannot be perfect all the time, so read his postings with balance and try not be too judgemental because the reader is supposed to read different types of news sources before making a determination, right?  Jubal never says that his posting is the ONLY PERSPECTIVE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: junior</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/12/why-didnt-andrew-do-mention-his-sandwich-shop-during-his-council-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-77284</link>
		<dc:creator>junior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 03:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=15677#comment-77284</guid>
		<description>I still wanna know if Thomas Choo Trane is related to Thomas the Choo-Choo Train.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still wanna know if Thomas Choo Trane is related to Thomas the Choo-Choo Train.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonyms</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/12/why-didnt-andrew-do-mention-his-sandwich-shop-during-his-council-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-77273</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonyms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 01:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=15677#comment-77273</guid>
		<description>Not familiar with that speech class Thomas, and I don&#039;t think I want to be. I prefer to say what I mean first and second and if someone threatens anyone when I&#039;m around ... well they might have to talk to me first as I will be in their face. 

Those who seek to intimidate will never be my friend but I&#039;d love to be their associate for as long as they want to play. You are right, I&#039;m not a nice person - I&#039;m too situational to be called that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not familiar with that speech class Thomas, and I don&#8217;t think I want to be. I prefer to say what I mean first and second and if someone threatens anyone when I&#8217;m around &#8230; well they might have to talk to me first as I will be in their face. </p>
<p>Those who seek to intimidate will never be my friend but I&#8217;d love to be their associate for as long as they want to play. You are right, I&#8217;m not a nice person &#8211; I&#8217;m too situational to be called that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Vixen</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/12/why-didnt-andrew-do-mention-his-sandwich-shop-during-his-council-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-77271</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Vixen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 01:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=15677#comment-77271</guid>
		<description>Thomas,

Seems you are making conflicting arguments:

&lt;b&gt; Jubal is a dead horse when it comes to objectivity.... his analysis lacks objectivity.&lt;/b&gt;

Then....  &lt;b&gt;He sees what he sees, which is not wrong,&lt;/b&gt;

Not being objective is going to hurt him going forward.  Not being objective when you are reporting FACTS is sneaky and undermines credibility.  In the past, this may have taken a back seat to just being a GOP mouthpiece and promoting the GOP agenda.  But that&#039;s pretty much coming to a halt.  It was unsustainable.  Matt made a living out of doing just that - defending the sometimes indefensible because it paid him well, as long as it was GOP sponsored.  He got what I would consider excessive perks at the public&#039;s and tax payer&#039;s expense out at the fair as political favors. Isn&#039;t that the kind of parasite that the GOP rails against? Talk about a Welfare Queen!

I don&#039;t know how he counts his readership.  He constantly nags and whines at Art and the sitemeter results, but just poking around there at the RC... he has no active, zealous readership posting comments and challenging the lines of discussion.  Where is the action? Why is Matt drawn to a site like OJ?  

You may not be any better or worse than Matt Cunningham, but I don&#039;t see you spouting off that you have a serious blog and that other blogs are weak and petty.  And then post to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas,</p>
<p>Seems you are making conflicting arguments:</p>
<p><b> Jubal is a dead horse when it comes to objectivity&#8230;. his analysis lacks objectivity.</b></p>
<p>Then&#8230;.  <b>He sees what he sees, which is not wrong,</b></p>
<p>Not being objective is going to hurt him going forward.  Not being objective when you are reporting FACTS is sneaky and undermines credibility.  In the past, this may have taken a back seat to just being a GOP mouthpiece and promoting the GOP agenda.  But that&#8217;s pretty much coming to a halt.  It was unsustainable.  Matt made a living out of doing just that &#8211; defending the sometimes indefensible because it paid him well, as long as it was GOP sponsored.  He got what I would consider excessive perks at the public&#8217;s and tax payer&#8217;s expense out at the fair as political favors. Isn&#8217;t that the kind of parasite that the GOP rails against? Talk about a Welfare Queen!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how he counts his readership.  He constantly nags and whines at Art and the sitemeter results, but just poking around there at the RC&#8230; he has no active, zealous readership posting comments and challenging the lines of discussion.  Where is the action? Why is Matt drawn to a site like OJ?  </p>
<p>You may not be any better or worse than Matt Cunningham, but I don&#8217;t see you spouting off that you have a serious blog and that other blogs are weak and petty.  And then post to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Choo Trane</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/12/why-didnt-andrew-do-mention-his-sandwich-shop-during-his-council-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-77269</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Choo Trane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=15677#comment-77269</guid>
		<description>Red Vixen, Jubal is a dead horse when it comes to objectivity. He is as conservative as radioactivity to uranium-235.  His posts do provide punctual and timely information and usually accurate, but his analysis lacks objectivity.

He sees what he sees, which is not wrong, but it is better to see both sides and determine that one view supersedes another for reason(s).  

Not that I am saying I am close or any better than Jubal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red Vixen, Jubal is a dead horse when it comes to objectivity. He is as conservative as radioactivity to uranium-235.  His posts do provide punctual and timely information and usually accurate, but his analysis lacks objectivity.</p>
<p>He sees what he sees, which is not wrong, but it is better to see both sides and determine that one view supersedes another for reason(s).  </p>
<p>Not that I am saying I am close or any better than Jubal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean H. Mill</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/12/why-didnt-andrew-do-mention-his-sandwich-shop-during-his-council-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-77267</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean H. Mill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=15677#comment-77267</guid>
		<description>Jubal,

So then &quot;yes&quot; you defrauded your readers when you heaped praise on Matt and vice/versa?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jubal,</p>
<p>So then &#8220;yes&#8221; you defrauded your readers when you heaped praise on Matt and vice/versa?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Vixen</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/12/why-didnt-andrew-do-mention-his-sandwich-shop-during-his-council-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-77266</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Vixen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=15677#comment-77266</guid>
		<description>Now I understand Art&#039;s insistence on referring to Mr. Jubal as Matt Cunningham.  

The weight alone of being such a dork to try and trick people into lies and duplicity should be worn around the neck of Matt Cunningham.  Matt has a political &quot;consulting&quot; business, yet he plays on blogs he considers meaningless and unworthy.  

I smell a dead skunk and it looks like its decaying over at Red County.

First they took away his free tickets and meals at the fair..... what will fall away next?  Party&#039;s over, Dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I understand Art&#8217;s insistence on referring to Mr. Jubal as Matt Cunningham.  </p>
<p>The weight alone of being such a dork to try and trick people into lies and duplicity should be worn around the neck of Matt Cunningham.  Matt has a political &#8220;consulting&#8221; business, yet he plays on blogs he considers meaningless and unworthy.  </p>
<p>I smell a dead skunk and it looks like its decaying over at Red County.</p>
<p>First they took away his free tickets and meals at the fair&#8230;.. what will fall away next?  Party&#8217;s over, Dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Choo Trane</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/12/why-didnt-andrew-do-mention-his-sandwich-shop-during-his-council-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-77265</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Choo Trane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=15677#comment-77265</guid>
		<description>@Anonyms: Skip the &quot;Happy New Year&quot; bit; first impression is everything, and you are not a nice person, calling me names.

I said what I said in the spirit of things to prove a point, not to be taken verbatim.  Did you not take a speech class on delivery?  You skip the first part and pay attention to the main content.

BTW, happy holidays to you and yours!  This is not an act of friendship or anything.  Got it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anonyms: Skip the &#8220;Happy New Year&#8221; bit; first impression is everything, and you are not a nice person, calling me names.</p>
<p>I said what I said in the spirit of things to prove a point, not to be taken verbatim.  Did you not take a speech class on delivery?  You skip the first part and pay attention to the main content.</p>
<p>BTW, happy holidays to you and yours!  This is not an act of friendship or anything.  Got it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

