<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New SAUSD corruption open thread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/06/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/06/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-sausd-corruption-open-thread</link>
	<description>Orange County&#039;s top political blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:09:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: confused anon</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/06/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/comment-page-20/#comment-78037</link>
		<dc:creator>confused anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/#comment-78037</guid>
		<description>BTW, if the school year is shortened by a week, you have taken an approximate 3% pay cut.  Tack on to that any money that the District goes for either in give back or in increased benefits- looks pretty bad, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, if the school year is shortened by a week, you have taken an approximate 3% pay cut.  Tack on to that any money that the District goes for either in give back or in increased benefits- looks pretty bad, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/06/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/comment-page-20/#comment-78026</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/#comment-78026</guid>
		<description>Anon teacher,

In fact what percentage of kids really show up for school the last 2 weeks of school anyway? The last week is what? Half days plus 1 minute for ADA and even then a majority of the high school students don&#039;t show up. Try policing the schools and city the last 2 weeks of school. Their are more kids running around town than in classrooms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon teacher,</p>
<p>In fact what percentage of kids really show up for school the last 2 weeks of school anyway? The last week is what? Half days plus 1 minute for ADA and even then a majority of the high school students don&#8217;t show up. Try policing the schools and city the last 2 weeks of school. Their are more kids running around town than in classrooms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon teacher</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/06/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/comment-page-20/#comment-78022</link>
		<dc:creator>anon teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/#comment-78022</guid>
		<description>I sure hope they subtract that week from the END of the school year. It seems that Santa Ana keeps adding days to the end of the year and all of the state testing is completed by the first week of May. This amounts to about 6 weeks less to teach the content the kids are supposed to know. Granted, we still teach after the test, but what a waste when our kids need that time so much (and how much do they really remember by May of the following year?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure hope they subtract that week from the END of the school year. It seems that Santa Ana keeps adding days to the end of the year and all of the state testing is completed by the first week of May. This amounts to about 6 weeks less to teach the content the kids are supposed to know. Granted, we still teach after the test, but what a waste when our kids need that time so much (and how much do they really remember by May of the following year?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Vixen</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/06/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/comment-page-20/#comment-78018</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Vixen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/#comment-78018</guid>
		<description>http://www.ocregister.com/articles/school-year-million-2274175-cuts-schools

&lt;i&gt; Monday, January 5, 2009
O.C. schools can survive $490 million in mid-year cuts, educators say
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger offers up a plan to close California&#039;s budget deficit, including a shorter school year next fall.
By SCOTT MARTINDALE
The Orange County Register
Comments 0&#124; Recommend 0

Orange County schools would survive $490 million in mid-year cuts proposed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, but would be forced to continue slashing employees and programs as they brace for several more years of gloomy budgets, officials said Monday.

The governor&#039;s office last week unveiled its latest plan to close a projected $41.6 billion, 18-month budget deficit, which included cutting $2.1 billion in immediate cuts from public schools and withholding $2.8 billion until July, when the next fiscal year begins. 

In Orange County, the plan would require about $210 million in immediate cuts from K-12 schools, plus tapping into about $280 million of rainy-day reserve funds to weather the temporary drop in funding levels.

&quot;We&#039;re fighting for every dollar for kids this year, but we&#039;re also realistic and know we can&#039;t just not take cuts,&quot; said county schools Superintendent Bill Habermehl. &quot;In Orange County, we&#039;re in a much better position than the rest of California because our school districts are well managed. It will hurt, but not as much.&quot;

The governor&#039;s office has released multiple budget proposals in the past few months, all calling for multi-billion cuts to public education. But the state Legislature thus far has failed to act on the widening budget gap, leaving school districts in limbo as they work to stay afloat financially.

&quot;It&#039;s really early to anticipate what or how we&#039;re going to cut,&quot; said Julie Hatchel, spokeswoman for the 52,000-student Capistrano Unified School District, which is preparing for $16 million to $17 million in mid-year cuts. &quot;Our reserves are already extremely low. Depending on what they&#039;re expecting us to cut or use from our reserves, it could be problematic. We&#039;ve already made so many cuts to our programs.&quot;

Last year, K-12 education funding was cut by about $3 billion from what schools had expected to receive under state funding formulas. 

In response, school districts across Orange County slashed a combined $150 million, laying off scores of custodians, groundskeepers, office workers and administrators, plus forcing more than 100 teachers to find employment elsewhere.

&lt;b&gt;&quot;For the state to tell you that you have to maintain class sizes, buy new text books, and comply with everything else they demand and not give you the funding for it is just crazy,&quot; said Audrey Yamagata-Noji, a trustee for the 54,500-student Santa Ana Unified School District, which is looking to cut upward of $46 million over the next two years.&lt;/b&gt;

Under the governor&#039;s latest plan, the future isn&#039;t bright for the next school year, either. K-12 schools in 2009-10 would receive $3.1 billion less than what they expected to get under state funding formulas. Part of the cost-savings would come from a proposal to cut the school year short by a week, shaving off $1.1 billion.

California schools Superintendent Jack O&#039;Connell has blasted the governor&#039;s plan for funding education, saying it would create &quot;a cash flow crisis&quot; for school districts and shortchange California&#039;s future.

&quot;This budget proposal would be devastating for not only public education, but to the state,&quot; O&#039;Connell said Friday. &quot;This is less learning opportunities for students, longer bus rides, fewer materials. Many of us would like to see a longer school day now and this takes us in the opposite direction.&quot;

Cutting the 2009-10 school year by five days would create a substantial and potentially difficult adjustment period, educators said, but they said that Orange County&#039;s teachers would be able to rise to the challenge.

&quot;Given enough time, our teachers are flexible enough to handle a change in schedule,&quot; said Tom Turner, spokesman for the 34,000-student Saddleback Valley Unified School District, which is bracing for about $10 million in mid-year cuts. &quot;Our teachers are professionals and they have their year set out – 180 days to get through textbooks, standardized testing, reviewing how to be a better teacher. Taking away the five days can change the way a teacher runs a program.&quot;

Staff writer Fermin Leal contributed to this report.

Contact the writer: 949-454-7394 or smartindale@ocregister.com

  &lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ocregister.com/articles/school-year-million-2274175-cuts-schools" rel="nofollow">http://www.ocregister.com/articles/school-year-million-2274175-cuts-schools</a></p>
<p><i> Monday, January 5, 2009<br />
O.C. schools can survive $490 million in mid-year cuts, educators say<br />
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger offers up a plan to close California&#8217;s budget deficit, including a shorter school year next fall.<br />
By SCOTT MARTINDALE<br />
The Orange County Register<br />
Comments 0| Recommend 0</p>
<p>Orange County schools would survive $490 million in mid-year cuts proposed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, but would be forced to continue slashing employees and programs as they brace for several more years of gloomy budgets, officials said Monday.</p>
<p>The governor&#8217;s office last week unveiled its latest plan to close a projected $41.6 billion, 18-month budget deficit, which included cutting $2.1 billion in immediate cuts from public schools and withholding $2.8 billion until July, when the next fiscal year begins. </p>
<p>In Orange County, the plan would require about $210 million in immediate cuts from K-12 schools, plus tapping into about $280 million of rainy-day reserve funds to weather the temporary drop in funding levels.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re fighting for every dollar for kids this year, but we&#8217;re also realistic and know we can&#8217;t just not take cuts,&#8221; said county schools Superintendent Bill Habermehl. &#8220;In Orange County, we&#8217;re in a much better position than the rest of California because our school districts are well managed. It will hurt, but not as much.&#8221;</p>
<p>The governor&#8217;s office has released multiple budget proposals in the past few months, all calling for multi-billion cuts to public education. But the state Legislature thus far has failed to act on the widening budget gap, leaving school districts in limbo as they work to stay afloat financially.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s really early to anticipate what or how we&#8217;re going to cut,&#8221; said Julie Hatchel, spokeswoman for the 52,000-student Capistrano Unified School District, which is preparing for $16 million to $17 million in mid-year cuts. &#8220;Our reserves are already extremely low. Depending on what they&#8217;re expecting us to cut or use from our reserves, it could be problematic. We&#8217;ve already made so many cuts to our programs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Last year, K-12 education funding was cut by about $3 billion from what schools had expected to receive under state funding formulas. </p>
<p>In response, school districts across Orange County slashed a combined $150 million, laying off scores of custodians, groundskeepers, office workers and administrators, plus forcing more than 100 teachers to find employment elsewhere.</p>
<p><b>&#8220;For the state to tell you that you have to maintain class sizes, buy new text books, and comply with everything else they demand and not give you the funding for it is just crazy,&#8221; said Audrey Yamagata-Noji, a trustee for the 54,500-student Santa Ana Unified School District, which is looking to cut upward of $46 million over the next two years.</b></p>
<p>Under the governor&#8217;s latest plan, the future isn&#8217;t bright for the next school year, either. K-12 schools in 2009-10 would receive $3.1 billion less than what they expected to get under state funding formulas. Part of the cost-savings would come from a proposal to cut the school year short by a week, shaving off $1.1 billion.</p>
<p>California schools Superintendent Jack O&#8217;Connell has blasted the governor&#8217;s plan for funding education, saying it would create &#8220;a cash flow crisis&#8221; for school districts and shortchange California&#8217;s future.</p>
<p>&#8220;This budget proposal would be devastating for not only public education, but to the state,&#8221; O&#8217;Connell said Friday. &#8220;This is less learning opportunities for students, longer bus rides, fewer materials. Many of us would like to see a longer school day now and this takes us in the opposite direction.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cutting the 2009-10 school year by five days would create a substantial and potentially difficult adjustment period, educators said, but they said that Orange County&#8217;s teachers would be able to rise to the challenge.</p>
<p>&#8220;Given enough time, our teachers are flexible enough to handle a change in schedule,&#8221; said Tom Turner, spokesman for the 34,000-student Saddleback Valley Unified School District, which is bracing for about $10 million in mid-year cuts. &#8220;Our teachers are professionals and they have their year set out – 180 days to get through textbooks, standardized testing, reviewing how to be a better teacher. Taking away the five days can change the way a teacher runs a program.&#8221;</p>
<p>Staff writer Fermin Leal contributed to this report.</p>
<p>Contact the writer: 949-454-7394 or <a href="mailto:smartindale@ocregister.com">smartindale@ocregister.com</a></p>
<p>  </i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonplus</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/06/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/comment-page-20/#comment-77971</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonplus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/#comment-77971</guid>
		<description>Confused Anon,

Could you please direct me to the Ed Code section to which you refer? All I find is the amount each board member can be paid monthly for attending board meetings. The amounts are based on the size of that district. I see nothing about any entitlement of health benefits.

Since these people are elected officials I find it difficult to believe that the Ed Code would provide for health benefits to anyone simply because they are re-elected a certain number of times. Please correct me if I am wrong. The Ed Code is about the most screwed up code in California thus anything is possible but I really find it difficult to buy your statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confused Anon,</p>
<p>Could you please direct me to the Ed Code section to which you refer? All I find is the amount each board member can be paid monthly for attending board meetings. The amounts are based on the size of that district. I see nothing about any entitlement of health benefits.</p>
<p>Since these people are elected officials I find it difficult to believe that the Ed Code would provide for health benefits to anyone simply because they are re-elected a certain number of times. Please correct me if I am wrong. The Ed Code is about the most screwed up code in California thus anything is possible but I really find it difficult to buy your statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: confused anon</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/06/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/comment-page-20/#comment-77935</link>
		<dc:creator>confused anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/#comment-77935</guid>
		<description>#964-seems that BOE members get benefits after a certain number of years according to the CA Ed code
#970- I don&#039;tunderstand your last statement</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#964-seems that BOE members get benefits after a certain number of years according to the CA Ed code<br />
#970- I don&#8217;tunderstand your last statement</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SAUSD teacher</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/06/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/comment-page-20/#comment-77909</link>
		<dc:creator>SAUSD teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/#comment-77909</guid>
		<description>#968
MISS(Russo)management:
1) Joe (Taj Majal) Dixon (major loser from CUSD) at $164,000 salary +++ support positions +++ new offices.
2) Juan &quot;hack&quot; Lopez, $20,000 salary increase ++ new job title.

Sorry, she&#039;s too busy creating more administrative positions to bother with studying to achieve a doctorate in education. 

Failure is unacceptable, it&#039;s up to us all TO KEEP DISTRICT ADMINISTRATORS IN JOBS THEY AREN&#039;T QUALIFIED TO FULFILL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#968<br />
MISS(Russo)management:<br />
1) Joe (Taj Majal) Dixon (major loser from CUSD) at $164,000 salary +++ support positions +++ new offices.<br />
2) Juan &#8220;hack&#8221; Lopez, $20,000 salary increase ++ new job title.</p>
<p>Sorry, she&#8217;s too busy creating more administrative positions to bother with studying to achieve a doctorate in education. </p>
<p>Failure is unacceptable, it&#8217;s up to us all TO KEEP DISTRICT ADMINISTRATORS IN JOBS THEY AREN&#8217;T QUALIFIED TO FULFILL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon teacher</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/06/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/comment-page-20/#comment-77859</link>
		<dc:creator>anon teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/#comment-77859</guid>
		<description>I too, have been with this district for a long time (over 20 years), and yes, insurance was fully paid for SAEA members for about just about 10 years of my employment. It is not just CSEA paying for benefits now though. While our costs were low a few years ago, recent negotiations have us paying 9% of the costs. Agreeing to pay a percentage rather than a flat amount has resulted in a guaranteed increase in our out of pocket costs every year. I have seen co pays go from $5 to the current cost of $20 and I have seen prescriptions go from $4 to the current anything they want to charge (I&#039;ve paid anywhere from $10-$30 and a few prescriptions that were just not covered at all by our plan). Anyone can say that corruption is the problem in SAUSD and I really won&#039;t disagree with them, however, insurance costs ARE one of the biggest problems facing the district. Blue Cross is claiming that last year they lost money and will try to recoup it by charging more this year. No one ever questions their accounting though. I find it incredibly difficult to believe that even with some major illnesses that this company could be losing money on SAUSD. Just take a look at what Blue Cross actually pays compared to the bill the average person receives, there is just no way there are losing money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too, have been with this district for a long time (over 20 years), and yes, insurance was fully paid for SAEA members for about just about 10 years of my employment. It is not just CSEA paying for benefits now though. While our costs were low a few years ago, recent negotiations have us paying 9% of the costs. Agreeing to pay a percentage rather than a flat amount has resulted in a guaranteed increase in our out of pocket costs every year. I have seen co pays go from $5 to the current cost of $20 and I have seen prescriptions go from $4 to the current anything they want to charge (I&#8217;ve paid anywhere from $10-$30 and a few prescriptions that were just not covered at all by our plan). Anyone can say that corruption is the problem in SAUSD and I really won&#8217;t disagree with them, however, insurance costs ARE one of the biggest problems facing the district. Blue Cross is claiming that last year they lost money and will try to recoup it by charging more this year. No one ever questions their accounting though. I find it incredibly difficult to believe that even with some major illnesses that this company could be losing money on SAUSD. Just take a look at what Blue Cross actually pays compared to the bill the average person receives, there is just no way there are losing money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/06/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/comment-page-20/#comment-77857</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/#comment-77857</guid>
		<description>SAUSD continues to be mismanaged.  We all see the waste and yet the board of education and Jane Russo target cuts closest to the students.  Poorly run organizations typically have an excessive number of bullies that are in control. Incompetence breeds incompetence.

 Here is an excellent video describing the types of bully behavior, what you can do about it and some upcoming legislation that would help to curb this particular brand of incompetence.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lfv3PB202H0&amp;eurl=http://therightnottobebullied.blogspot.com/2009/01/actively-aware-monday4-missing-roxanne.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAUSD continues to be mismanaged.  We all see the waste and yet the board of education and Jane Russo target cuts closest to the students.  Poorly run organizations typically have an excessive number of bullies that are in control. Incompetence breeds incompetence.</p>
<p> Here is an excellent video describing the types of bully behavior, what you can do about it and some upcoming legislation that would help to curb this particular brand of incompetence.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lfv3PB202H0&#038;eurl=http://therightnottobebullied.blogspot.com/2009/01/actively-aware-monday4-missing-roxanne.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lfv3PB202H0&#038;eurl=http://therightnottobebullied.blogspot.com/2009/01/actively-aware-monday4-missing-roxanne.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fed Up</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/06/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/comment-page-20/#comment-77854</link>
		<dc:creator>Fed Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/#comment-77854</guid>
		<description>Finding solutions to the budget problems of SAUSD would be easy to do..... but every time a dollar or two is found because of these drastic cuts....it is either wasted because of management&#039;s incompetance or it finds its way into the pockets of people like Juan Lopez, Russo, Olsky, Dixon, and Boden.

Health Insurance is not the problem.
California Governor Arnold S. is not the problem.
The problem is corruption in high places at Santa Ana City Hall and SAUSD.

The residents of Santa Ana seem to be unwilling or unable to stand up for themselves and their children. I&#039;m positive that standing up for oneself wouldn&#039;t work anyway. Only when they stand together will it work.

Why is Franklin Elementary School still standing?
Why hasn&#039;t anyone sued the school district for allowing students to be taught in that toxic waste dump? I&#039;m amazed that no one demands answers. Why do parents send their students to that polluted school?  There has been a coverup.

The Hot Potato goes from Mayor Pulido to Hildy Myers (UCI) to Camille Boden to the Santa Ana Courts.

Are the kids getting any better over there at Franklin? There wasn&#039;t any environmental cleanup.....just sweeping it under the rug as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finding solutions to the budget problems of SAUSD would be easy to do&#8230;.. but every time a dollar or two is found because of these drastic cuts&#8230;.it is either wasted because of management&#8217;s incompetance or it finds its way into the pockets of people like Juan Lopez, Russo, Olsky, Dixon, and Boden.</p>
<p>Health Insurance is not the problem.<br />
California Governor Arnold S. is not the problem.<br />
The problem is corruption in high places at Santa Ana City Hall and SAUSD.</p>
<p>The residents of Santa Ana seem to be unwilling or unable to stand up for themselves and their children. I&#8217;m positive that standing up for oneself wouldn&#8217;t work anyway. Only when they stand together will it work.</p>
<p>Why is Franklin Elementary School still standing?<br />
Why hasn&#8217;t anyone sued the school district for allowing students to be taught in that toxic waste dump? I&#8217;m amazed that no one demands answers. Why do parents send their students to that polluted school?  There has been a coverup.</p>
<p>The Hot Potato goes from Mayor Pulido to Hildy Myers (UCI) to Camille Boden to the Santa Ana Courts.</p>
<p>Are the kids getting any better over there at Franklin? There wasn&#8217;t any environmental cleanup&#8230;..just sweeping it under the rug as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonplus</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/06/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/comment-page-20/#comment-77839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonplus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 05:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/#comment-77839</guid>
		<description>Anon Teacher,

My past few comments have been in the heat of temper and hopefully I have regained my composure if not my spelling.

To my knowledge part time classified employees only get benefits if they exceed a certain amount of hours per day/month. CSEA agreed to the districts reductions for some but not for all only so some employees would continue to have some sort of benefits. My question has been why CSEA not defend all rather than a few? Thus I sort of lost my grip on gentlemanship. But it does anger me.

I agree it is a sad state of affairs when the district uses insurance as a keystone for cutting jobs. When I came to SAUSD they not only paid all of the insurance but also PERS. That was a long time ago and CSEA bargained all of that away.

Insurance is a monster. You can watch TV ads for insurance and see the price Blue Cross and others offer. Health costs have gone over the wall but for that I don&#039;t blame the district so much. Over my time the district went to at least 4 different insurance carriers to keep the price down, but only after CSEA agreed to force employees to pay part of the costs.

I&#039;m not defending the district on this matter only stating previous boards and superintendents tried to keep the price as low as possible. I don&#039;t know about this current batch of scallywags since they seem to be most self serving including insurance packages for themselves. Since all are employed elsewhere, I would ask why for starters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon Teacher,</p>
<p>My past few comments have been in the heat of temper and hopefully I have regained my composure if not my spelling.</p>
<p>To my knowledge part time classified employees only get benefits if they exceed a certain amount of hours per day/month. CSEA agreed to the districts reductions for some but not for all only so some employees would continue to have some sort of benefits. My question has been why CSEA not defend all rather than a few? Thus I sort of lost my grip on gentlemanship. But it does anger me.</p>
<p>I agree it is a sad state of affairs when the district uses insurance as a keystone for cutting jobs. When I came to SAUSD they not only paid all of the insurance but also PERS. That was a long time ago and CSEA bargained all of that away.</p>
<p>Insurance is a monster. You can watch TV ads for insurance and see the price Blue Cross and others offer. Health costs have gone over the wall but for that I don&#8217;t blame the district so much. Over my time the district went to at least 4 different insurance carriers to keep the price down, but only after CSEA agreed to force employees to pay part of the costs.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not defending the district on this matter only stating previous boards and superintendents tried to keep the price as low as possible. I don&#8217;t know about this current batch of scallywags since they seem to be most self serving including insurance packages for themselves. Since all are employed elsewhere, I would ask why for starters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon teacher</title>
		<link>http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2008/06/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/comment-page-20/#comment-77799</link>
		<dc:creator>anon teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 05:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/new-sausd-corruption-open-thread/#comment-77799</guid>
		<description>All of this talk about part timers not deserving benefits really brings home a few points. 
#1 That&#039;s exactly the reason that so many people who were doing full time jobs at the district no longer have full time jobs, it&#039;s pretty sad when health insurance becomes so costly that the district&#039;s response is to take these people away from serving the students. 
#2 Something has to be done about the costs of health insurance.
#3 When others don&#039;t have something (like insurance in a part time job), they assume that this is the way it SHOULD be, and no one else deserves what they don&#039;t have. Just because it is that way, doesn&#039;t mean it is right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of this talk about part timers not deserving benefits really brings home a few points.<br />
#1 That&#8217;s exactly the reason that so many people who were doing full time jobs at the district no longer have full time jobs, it&#8217;s pretty sad when health insurance becomes so costly that the district&#8217;s response is to take these people away from serving the students.<br />
#2 Something has to be done about the costs of health insurance.<br />
#3 When others don&#8217;t have something (like insurance in a part time job), they assume that this is the way it SHOULD be, and no one else deserves what they don&#8217;t have. Just because it is that way, doesn&#8217;t mean it is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

